RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      20세기 초 天津審判廳과 中ㆍ外 교섭재판 = Tianjin court and Sino-foreign mixed trials in the early 20th century

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109140399

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Tianjin Court was the first new-style court established during the New Policy at the end of the Qing Dynasty, and one of its main purposes being the restoration the ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ exercised by foreigners. Among the ‘extraterritorial jurisdictions’ that existed in modern China, this article focused on the mixed trials between Chinses(defendants) and foreigners(plaintiff), and examined the changes brought by the construction of Tianjin Court and its characteristics.
      The mixed cases in Tianjin were primarily commecial disputes. Before the establishment of the Tianjin court, such cases were handled by the Tianjin magistrate. However, due to foreigners' negative perception of the traiditional Chinse judicial system and its inherent limitations, mixed tirals were not efficiently conducted. Consequently, the consulates in Tianjin demanded to establish a mixed court exclusively for handling such cases. In response to this demand, the Zhili Governor-Genral and the director of Tianjin maritime customs sought various solutions, and eventually deciding to construct a western-sytle court, Tianjin court.
      The most significant change that occured was the institutionalization of the mixed trials. The mixed trials conducted by Tianjin court combined the western systems with traditional Chinese methods, thereby improving foreigners' satisfaction with mixed trial and increasing their confidence in the Chinese judiciary.
      The institutionalization of the mixed trial led to an increase in the number of foreign merchants suing directly in Tianjin court, bypassing their consulates. Tianjin court followed established rules and procedures for conducting the mixed trials, and dealt with Chinese defendants in accordance with ‘Chinese law’. Furthermore, as seen in the case of the Firm of Betram(志誠洋行), Tianjin court resisted the German diplomats' attempt to intervene the trial on the basis of treaties and general legal principles. In short, Tianjin court conducted the mixed trials as a new style court, which was in line with the ultimate purpose, the protection of judicial sovereignty.
      번역하기

      Tianjin Court was the first new-style court established during the New Policy at the end of the Qing Dynasty, and one of its main purposes being the restoration the ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ exercised by foreigners. Among the ‘extraterrito...

      Tianjin Court was the first new-style court established during the New Policy at the end of the Qing Dynasty, and one of its main purposes being the restoration the ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ exercised by foreigners. Among the ‘extraterritorial jurisdictions’ that existed in modern China, this article focused on the mixed trials between Chinses(defendants) and foreigners(plaintiff), and examined the changes brought by the construction of Tianjin Court and its characteristics.
      The mixed cases in Tianjin were primarily commecial disputes. Before the establishment of the Tianjin court, such cases were handled by the Tianjin magistrate. However, due to foreigners' negative perception of the traiditional Chinse judicial system and its inherent limitations, mixed tirals were not efficiently conducted. Consequently, the consulates in Tianjin demanded to establish a mixed court exclusively for handling such cases. In response to this demand, the Zhili Governor-Genral and the director of Tianjin maritime customs sought various solutions, and eventually deciding to construct a western-sytle court, Tianjin court.
      The most significant change that occured was the institutionalization of the mixed trials. The mixed trials conducted by Tianjin court combined the western systems with traditional Chinese methods, thereby improving foreigners' satisfaction with mixed trial and increasing their confidence in the Chinese judiciary.
      The institutionalization of the mixed trial led to an increase in the number of foreign merchants suing directly in Tianjin court, bypassing their consulates. Tianjin court followed established rules and procedures for conducting the mixed trials, and dealt with Chinese defendants in accordance with ‘Chinese law’. Furthermore, as seen in the case of the Firm of Betram(志誠洋行), Tianjin court resisted the German diplomats' attempt to intervene the trial on the basis of treaties and general legal principles. In short, Tianjin court conducted the mixed trials as a new style court, which was in line with the ultimate purpose, the protection of judicial sovereignty.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 문준영, "법원과 검찰의 탄생-사법의 역사로 읽는 대한민국" 역사비평사 2010

      2 신우철, "근대 사법제도 성립사 비교연구-중국에 있어서 ‘법원조직’법제의 초기 형성" 34 : 2006

      3 周鯁生, "領事裁判權" 商務印書館 1923

      4 "順天時報"

      5 公丕祥, "近代中國的司法發展" 法律出版社 2011

      6 王立民, "論淸末審判方式的改革" (4) : 1999

      7 胡光明, "論早期天津商會的性質與作用" (4) : 1986

      8 天津市檔案館, "袁世凱天津檔案史料選編" 天津古籍出版社 1990

      9 駱寶善, "袁世凱全集" 河南大學出版社 2013

      10 直隷高等審判廳書記室, "華洋訴訟判決錄" 中國政法大學出版社 2003

      1 문준영, "법원과 검찰의 탄생-사법의 역사로 읽는 대한민국" 역사비평사 2010

      2 신우철, "근대 사법제도 성립사 비교연구-중국에 있어서 ‘법원조직’법제의 초기 형성" 34 : 2006

      3 周鯁生, "領事裁判權" 商務印書館 1923

      4 "順天時報"

      5 公丕祥, "近代中國的司法發展" 法律出版社 2011

      6 王立民, "論淸末審判方式的改革" (4) : 1999

      7 胡光明, "論早期天津商會的性質與作用" (4) : 1986

      8 天津市檔案館, "袁世凱天津檔案史料選編" 天津古籍出版社 1990

      9 駱寶善, "袁世凱全集" 河南大學出版社 2013

      10 直隷高等審判廳書記室, "華洋訴訟判決錄" 中國政法大學出版社 2003

      11 "約章成案匯覽" 北洋洋務局 1995

      12 "盛京時報"

      13 "申報"

      14 "爲送本局試行裁判辦法的函"

      15 王浩, "淸末訴訟模式的演進" 中國政法大學 2005

      16 西川真子, "淸末裁判制度の改革" 53 (53): 1994

      17 古宮博物院明淸檔案部, "淸末籌備立憲檔案史料" 中華書局 1979

      18 李超, "淸末民初的審判獨立硏究-以法源設置與法官先任爲中心" 中國政法大學 2004

      19 林明德, "淸末民初的司法改革" 26 : 1999

      20 章惠萍, "淸末司法改革述論" (03) : 2004

      21 島田正郞, "淸末における近代的法典の編纂" 創文社 1980

      22 조병식, "淸末 新政期 경찰의 사법 기능 — 天津 경찰의 사례를 중심으로" 90 : 2021

      23 臨時臺灣舊慣調査會, "淸國行政法" 汲古書院 1972

      24 滋賀秀三, "淸代中國の法と裁判" 創文社 2002

      25 黃源盛, "民初大理院與裁判" 元照 2012

      26 遲雲飛, "晩淸預備立憲與司法獨立" (3) : 2007

      27 蔡曉榮, "晩淸華洋商事糾紛硏究" 中華書局 2013

      28 焦褘琳, "晩淸河南審判廳考論" 2022

      29 李啓成, "晩淸各級審判廳硏究" 北京大學出版社 2004

      30 濱島敦俊, "明淸時代,中國の地方監獄-初步的考察" 33 : 1983

      31 范金民, "明淸商事糾紛與商業訴訟" 南京大學出版社 2007

      32 今井嘉幸, "支那國際法論" 丸善 1916

      33 "德志誠洋行失貨索賠案"

      34 "德商志誠洋行索欠案"

      35 趙德馨, "張之洞全集" 武漢出版社 2008

      36 天津市檔案館, "天津商會檔案匯編(1903-1911)" 天津人民出版社 1998

      37 天津地域史硏究會, "天津史-再生する都市のトボロジー" 東方書店 1999

      38 陳爭平, "天津口岸貿易與華北市場(1861-1913)" (11) : 1988

      39 李競能, "天津人口史" 南開大學出版社 1990

      40 "大淸法規大全" 考正出版社 1972

      41 "大淸新法令" 商務印書館 2010

      42 "大公報"

      43 孫學雷, "國家圖書館藏淸代孤本外交檔案" 全國圖書館文獻縮微復製中心 2003

      44 韓秀桃, "司法獨立與近代中國" 淸華大學出版社 2003

      45 "北洋法政學報"

      46 "北洋官報"

      47 甘厚慈, "北洋公牘類纂正續編" 天津古籍出版社 2013

      48 海關總署中外舊約章大全編纂委員會, "中外舊約章大全" 中國海關出版社 2004

      49 李春雷, "中國近代刑事訴訟制度變革硏究(1895-1928)" 北京大學出版社 2004

      50 XiaoQun Xu, "Trial of Modernity : Judicial Reform in Early Twentieth-Centry China, 1901-1937" Stanford University Press 2008

      51 "North China Herald"

      52 Turan Kayaolu, "Legal Imperialism Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China" Cambridge University Press 2010

      53 Zhang Chang, "Harbin to Hanoi: The colonial built environment in Asia, 1840 to 1940" Hongkong university press 2013

      54 조병식, "20세기 초 天津의 ‘治外法權’-混合裁判所 설립을 둘러싼 중외의 논쟁을 중심으로-" 165 : 2023

      55 조국, "19세기말~20세기 초 한중일 간 영사재판권 행사 문제-내외국인 혼합 사건에서의 觀審・聽審 시행을 중심으로" 55 : 2021

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼