RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Effect of Educational Background On Designers' Viewpoints

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13239436

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the product design area, much attention has been given to new product development which creates superior products through integrating and coordinating tasks. Solving product problems in new product development are influenced by industrial design and engineering design. The activities of these two areas are closely linked. Thus, the cooperation between industrial design majors and engineering design majors is important. However, it is known that such cooperation is quite difficult. There could be many reasons for this. I thought educational background could play an important role in this problem. In this research, I tried to find out how the difference in education, between industrial design and engineering design students, influences their viewpoint. First, suitable products, to be used in the experiments, were selected. After that, problems with the products were identified. Then, identified problems were prioritized and solved. Finally, the focus group interview evaluation was performed based on the previous problem solving results. The results of this study showed that there was a difference in viewpoint between these two groups. I found the convergent research design method, which allows for investigators to understand phenomena by qualitative analysis that were not disclosed by quantitative analysis was very effective. Through this process, I found out that viewpoints of the industrial major students were user-oriented while those of the engineering major students were product-oriented. Furthermore, I found out that the industrial design group’s main viewpoints expand to users and environment-centered whereas the engineering design group’s viewpoints were focused on product and realization-centered. These different viewpoints were maintained continuously in each group during the problem solving process. The same tendency was noticed when they identified, solved and evaluated problems. This proves clearly that educational background influences designers’ viewpoints. From the focus group interview, I found that if similar approaches were made to solve the problems, mutual understanding and cooperation would be easier. Based on this evidence, a way to minimize mutual conflict could be found through the analysis of the positive aspects of each other.
      번역하기

      In the product design area, much attention has been given to new product development which creates superior products through integrating and coordinating tasks. Solving product problems in new product development are influenced by industrial design an...

      In the product design area, much attention has been given to new product development which creates superior products through integrating and coordinating tasks. Solving product problems in new product development are influenced by industrial design and engineering design. The activities of these two areas are closely linked. Thus, the cooperation between industrial design majors and engineering design majors is important. However, it is known that such cooperation is quite difficult. There could be many reasons for this. I thought educational background could play an important role in this problem. In this research, I tried to find out how the difference in education, between industrial design and engineering design students, influences their viewpoint. First, suitable products, to be used in the experiments, were selected. After that, problems with the products were identified. Then, identified problems were prioritized and solved. Finally, the focus group interview evaluation was performed based on the previous problem solving results. The results of this study showed that there was a difference in viewpoint between these two groups. I found the convergent research design method, which allows for investigators to understand phenomena by qualitative analysis that were not disclosed by quantitative analysis was very effective. Through this process, I found out that viewpoints of the industrial major students were user-oriented while those of the engineering major students were product-oriented. Furthermore, I found out that the industrial design group’s main viewpoints expand to users and environment-centered whereas the engineering design group’s viewpoints were focused on product and realization-centered. These different viewpoints were maintained continuously in each group during the problem solving process. The same tendency was noticed when they identified, solved and evaluated problems. This proves clearly that educational background influences designers’ viewpoints. From the focus group interview, I found that if similar approaches were made to solve the problems, mutual understanding and cooperation would be easier. Based on this evidence, a way to minimize mutual conflict could be found through the analysis of the positive aspects of each other.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research background 1
      • 1.2 Research aim 2
      • 1.3 Research problems and hypothesis 3
      • 1.4 Research method 4
      • 1. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Research background 1
      • 1.2 Research aim 2
      • 1.3 Research problems and hypothesis 3
      • 1.4 Research method 4
      • 1.5 Thesis structure 5
      • 2. Literature review 6
      • 2.1 Industrial designer and engineering designer 6
      • 2.2 Previous experimental researches on design 7
      • 2.3 Necessity of research on designer’s viewpoint 13
      • 3. Experiment 1: Identification of design problems 16
      • 3.1 Product selection for the experiment 16
      • 3.1.1 The objective of selection 16
      • 3.1.2 Selection method 16
      • 3.1.3 Selection results 19
      • 3.2 Identification of design problems 21
      • 3.2.1 Purpose of experiment 21
      • 3.2.2 Experimental method 21
      • 3.2.3 Experimental results and analysis 24
      • 3.3 Findings at experiment 1 and discussion 38
      • 4. Experiment 2: Difference in problem solving procedure 39
      • 4.1 Purpose of experiment 39
      • 4. 2 Experimental procedure 39
      • 4.3 Experimental results and analysis 41
      • 4.4 Findings of experiment 2 and discussion 48
      • 5. Focus group interview: evaluation of problem solving results 49
      • 5.1 Objective of focus group interview 49
      • 5.2 Experimental method 49
      • 5.3 Experimental results and discussion 52
      • 5.4 Findings of FGI 57
      • 6. Conclusion 58
      • 6.1 Discussion and major findings 58
      • REFERENCES 62
      • APPENDICES 66
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼