RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      “O madness of discourse, / That cause sets up with and against itself!”: The classical notion of discordia concors in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103635624

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Much has been written about Homer’s description of the shield of Achilles. The spread of the humanism and the development of a print culture in the final decades of the fifteen-century England made people widely read Homer’s text in translations as seen from the case of George Chapman’s Achilles Shield. Our understanding of the description of Achilles’ shield is largely confined to its interpretation as the primary exemplum of ekphrasis, and our attention to Achilles’s shield, in this regard, is drawn to how classical texts provided the English renaissance poets with a rhetorical model to imitate.
      In this paper, however, I explore the extent to which Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida and Chapman’s Achilles Shield talked to each other in order to advance the notions of discordia concors (unity in diversity) and multum in parvo (greatness in little) both as a cultural phenomenon and as an experimental form of dramatic genre. Looking at Troilus’s speech “O madness of discourse, / That causes sets up with and against itself!” (5.2.140-141) in Act 5 that best captures the paradoxical situation, I argue that Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, like Chapman’s Achilles Shield that represents the whole (good and bad) of human life, can be seen conceived as a manifestation of the notion of discordia concors not only as a thematic framing of love, but also as a generic reconciliation between comedy and tragedy.
      The striving for realization of discordia concors in Shakespeare’s imaginative space is so important, but it has much difficulties in its own meaning-making. Nevertheless, the notion of discordia concors deserves our special attention to understanding of Shakespeare’s philosophy of life and his generic development.
      번역하기

      Much has been written about Homer’s description of the shield of Achilles. The spread of the humanism and the development of a print culture in the final decades of the fifteen-century England made people widely read Homer’s text in translations a...

      Much has been written about Homer’s description of the shield of Achilles. The spread of the humanism and the development of a print culture in the final decades of the fifteen-century England made people widely read Homer’s text in translations as seen from the case of George Chapman’s Achilles Shield. Our understanding of the description of Achilles’ shield is largely confined to its interpretation as the primary exemplum of ekphrasis, and our attention to Achilles’s shield, in this regard, is drawn to how classical texts provided the English renaissance poets with a rhetorical model to imitate.
      In this paper, however, I explore the extent to which Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida and Chapman’s Achilles Shield talked to each other in order to advance the notions of discordia concors (unity in diversity) and multum in parvo (greatness in little) both as a cultural phenomenon and as an experimental form of dramatic genre. Looking at Troilus’s speech “O madness of discourse, / That causes sets up with and against itself!” (5.2.140-141) in Act 5 that best captures the paradoxical situation, I argue that Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, like Chapman’s Achilles Shield that represents the whole (good and bad) of human life, can be seen conceived as a manifestation of the notion of discordia concors not only as a thematic framing of love, but also as a generic reconciliation between comedy and tragedy.
      The striving for realization of discordia concors in Shakespeare’s imaginative space is so important, but it has much difficulties in its own meaning-making. Nevertheless, the notion of discordia concors deserves our special attention to understanding of Shakespeare’s philosophy of life and his generic development.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한광석, "“Airy nothing” and Comprehensive Harmony in A Midsummer Night's Dream" 한국셰익스피어학회 40 (40): 1047-1066, 2004

      2 Wilson, Richard, "World Shakespeare: The Theater of Our Good Will" Edinburgh UP 2016

      3 Berry, Philippa, "Women, Language, and History in The Rape of Lucrece" 44 : 33-39, 1992

      4 Barker, Simon, "War and Nation in the Theatre of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries" Edinburgh UP 2007

      5 Girard, René, "Violence and Sacred" John Hopkins UP 1977

      6 Shakespeare, William, "Troilus and Cressida" Oxford UP 2008

      7 Shakespeare, William, "Troilus and Cressida" Bloomsbury 1998

      8 Newell, Alex, "The Soliloquies in Hamlet: The Structural Design" Fairleigh Dickinson UP 1991

      9 Bourdieu, Pierre, "The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field" Stanford UP 1996

      10 Green, Thomas M., "The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry" Yale UP 1982

      1 한광석, "“Airy nothing” and Comprehensive Harmony in A Midsummer Night's Dream" 한국셰익스피어학회 40 (40): 1047-1066, 2004

      2 Wilson, Richard, "World Shakespeare: The Theater of Our Good Will" Edinburgh UP 2016

      3 Berry, Philippa, "Women, Language, and History in The Rape of Lucrece" 44 : 33-39, 1992

      4 Barker, Simon, "War and Nation in the Theatre of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries" Edinburgh UP 2007

      5 Girard, René, "Violence and Sacred" John Hopkins UP 1977

      6 Shakespeare, William, "Troilus and Cressida" Oxford UP 2008

      7 Shakespeare, William, "Troilus and Cressida" Bloomsbury 1998

      8 Newell, Alex, "The Soliloquies in Hamlet: The Structural Design" Fairleigh Dickinson UP 1991

      9 Bourdieu, Pierre, "The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field" Stanford UP 1996

      10 Green, Thomas M., "The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry" Yale UP 1982

      11 Eliot, T. S., "The Complete Prose of T. S. Eliot: The Critical Edition Vol. 2" John Hopkins UP 375-385, 2014

      12 Gillespie, Stuart, "The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius" Cambridge UP 2007

      13 Fabre-Serris, J., "Statius’s Thebaid,: Women and War in Antiquity" Johns Hopkins UP 119-137, 2015

      14 James, Heather, "Shakespeare’s Troy: Drama, politics, and the translation of empire" Cambridge UP 1997

      15 Habib, Imitaz H., "Shakespeare’s Pluralistic Concepts of Character: A Study in Dramatic Anamorphism" SUP 1993

      16 O’Farrell, Brian, "Shakespeare’s Patron: William Herbert, Third Earl of Pembroke 1580-1630, Politics, Patronage and Power" Continuum 2011

      17 Bate, Jonathan, "Shakespeare’s Ovid" Clarendon 1993

      18 Spurgeon, Caroline, "Shakespeare’s Imagery and What It Tells Us" Cambridge UP 1971

      19 Gil Harris, Jonathan, "Shakespeare’s Hair: Staging the Object of Material Culture" 52 : 479-491, 2001

      20 Maquerlot, Jean-Pierre, "Shakespeare and the Mannerist Tradition: A Reading of Five Problem Plays" Cambridge UP 1995

      21 Platt, Peter G., "Shakespeare and the Culture of Paradox" Ashgate 2009

      22 Sillars Stuart, "Shakespeare and Visual Imagination" Cambridge UP 2015

      23 Foakes, R. A., "Shakespeare and Violence" Cambridge UP 2003

      24 Boas F. S., "Shakespeare and His Predecessors" John Murray 1901

      25 McNeely, Trevor, "Proteus Unmasked: Sixteenth-century Rhetoric and Art of Shakespeare" Lehigh UP 2004

      26 Colie, Rosalie L., "Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tradition of Paradox" Princeton UP 1966

      27 Wind, Edgar, "Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance" Penguin 1967

      28 Bullough, Geffrey, "Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare" Columbia UP 1966

      29 Meek, Richard, "Narrating the Visual in Shakespeare" Ashgate 2009

      30 Shakespeare, William, "Midsummer Night’s Dream" Cambridge UP 2003

      31 Pinksen, Daryl, "Marlowe’s Ghost: The Blacklisting of the Man Who Was Shakespeare" iUnivers 2008

      32 Sorensen, Jesper, "Magic among the Trobrianders: Conceptual Mapping in Magical Rituals" 3 : 36-64, 2008

      33 Northbrook, David, "Lucretius and the Early Modern" Oxford UP 2016

      34 Shoaf, R. Allen, "Lucretius and Shakespeare on the Nature of Things" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2014

      35 Adams, Simon, "Leicester and the Court: Essays on Elizabethan Politics" Manchester UP 2002

      36 Chapman, George, "Homer’s Achilles Shield" 1598

      37 Wolfe, Jessica, "Homer and the Question of Strife from Erasmus to Hobbes" U of Toronto P 2015

      38 Brower, Reuben A., "Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Greco-Roman Heroic Tradition" Oxford UP 1971

      39 Shakespeare, William, "Hamlet" Oxford UP 1994

      40 Bessone, Federica, "Federica. Love and War: Feminine Models, Epics Roles, and Gender Identity in Bevington, David. Tudor Drama and Politics" Jarvard UP 1968

      41 Schmidt, Gabriela, "Elizabethan Translation and Literary Culture" Walter de Gruyter 2013

      42 Huntley, Frank L., "Dr. Johnson and Metaphysical Wit: Or, ‘Discordia Concors’ Yoked and Balanced" 103-112, 1969

      43 Brown, Jane K., "Discordia Concors: On the Order of A Midsummer Night’s Dream" 48 : 2041-, 1987

      44 Goodblatt, Chantia, "Discordia Concors and Bidirectionality: Embodied Cognition in John Donne’s Songs and Sonnets" 38 (38): 163-188, 2017

      45 Jones-Davies, M. T, "Discord in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida; or the Conflict Between ‘Angry Mars and Venus Queen of Love’" 25 : 31-41, 1974

      46 Carus, Titus Lucretius, "De Rerum Nature (On the Nature of Things)" Cambridge UP 1977

      47 Shakespeare, William, "Complete Sonnets and Poems" Oxford UP 2002

      48 Briggis, John Channing, "Chapman’s Seaven Bookes of the Ilades: Mirror for Essex" 21 : 59-73, 1981

      49 Soelner, Rolf, "Chapman’s Caesar and Pompey and the Fortunes of Prince Henry" 2 : 135-151, 1985

      50 Muir, Kenneth, "Aspect of Shakespeare’s ‘Problem Plays’: Articles Reprinted from Shakespeare Survey" Cambridge UP 1982

      51 Ebel, Julia G., "A Numerical Survey of Elizabethan Translations" 22 : 104-127, 1979

      52 Langis, Unhae, "'Desire is Death’ in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida" 1-31, 2015

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2018 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스 영문학회 -> 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-07-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스영문학회 -> 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 1.112 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼