RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기능 심화형 한국어 교재 개발의 실제 - 「경희 한국어 읽기」 교재를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Development of an Intensive Skills - based Korean Language Textbook - Based on the Kyung Hee Korean Reading Textbook

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103574978

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Jung-Hee Lee. 2016. A Study on the Development of an Intensive Skills-based Korean Language Textbook -Based on the Kyung Hee Korean Reading Textbook. Journal of Korean Language Education 27-2: 193-228. The purpose of this study is to introduce the approaches and contents of a reading skills-based textbook developed by the Institute of International Education at Kyung Hee University. Moreover, the aim of the study is to compare the differences in language achievement between using an integrated reading textbook and an intensive skills-based textbook, and to further discuss the effects of developing an intensive skills-based textbook.
      In the context of Korean language education, reading and writing skills have not been sufficiently dealt with in classes and rather recognized as a secondary feature due to the emphasis of the communicative approach stressing speaking and listening skills. However, the advantages of an intensive skills-based reading textbook is that it focuses solely on reading skills, and therefore, aims to immerse the learners in real-world language contexts to acquire the specific language feature. Another advantage of the intensive skills-based textbook is that since it solely focuses on one function of language skills, a variety of topics and reading text genres can be accessible. In addition, as in the case of integrated textbooks, it dispels the concern that the detailed steps for improvement in each skill may possibly be overlooked. Moreover, it dismisses the concern that reading may be used as a secondary feature to learn vocabulary and grammar rather than the function itself.
      This study examined the reading abilities of 61 learners who studied with integrated textbooks from Basic 1 level to Advanced 1 level for five semesters and compared it with 57 learners who studied with intensive skills-based textbooks. Eight questions regarding ‘understanding factual information” and six questions on “making inferences” from the Korean Proficiency test (TOPIK) were provided and the results were compared. As a result, there was a meaningful difference of the score between the two groups which demonstrates that learners who were exposed to intensive skills-based textbooks showed better performance.
      번역하기

      Jung-Hee Lee. 2016. A Study on the Development of an Intensive Skills-based Korean Language Textbook -Based on the Kyung Hee Korean Reading Textbook. Journal of Korean Language Education 27-2: 193-228. The purpose of this study is to introduce the app...

      Jung-Hee Lee. 2016. A Study on the Development of an Intensive Skills-based Korean Language Textbook -Based on the Kyung Hee Korean Reading Textbook. Journal of Korean Language Education 27-2: 193-228. The purpose of this study is to introduce the approaches and contents of a reading skills-based textbook developed by the Institute of International Education at Kyung Hee University. Moreover, the aim of the study is to compare the differences in language achievement between using an integrated reading textbook and an intensive skills-based textbook, and to further discuss the effects of developing an intensive skills-based textbook.
      In the context of Korean language education, reading and writing skills have not been sufficiently dealt with in classes and rather recognized as a secondary feature due to the emphasis of the communicative approach stressing speaking and listening skills. However, the advantages of an intensive skills-based reading textbook is that it focuses solely on reading skills, and therefore, aims to immerse the learners in real-world language contexts to acquire the specific language feature. Another advantage of the intensive skills-based textbook is that since it solely focuses on one function of language skills, a variety of topics and reading text genres can be accessible. In addition, as in the case of integrated textbooks, it dispels the concern that the detailed steps for improvement in each skill may possibly be overlooked. Moreover, it dismisses the concern that reading may be used as a secondary feature to learn vocabulary and grammar rather than the function itself.
      This study examined the reading abilities of 61 learners who studied with integrated textbooks from Basic 1 level to Advanced 1 level for five semesters and compared it with 57 learners who studied with intensive skills-based textbooks. Eight questions regarding ‘understanding factual information” and six questions on “making inferences” from the Korean Proficiency test (TOPIK) were provided and the results were compared. As a result, there was a meaningful difference of the score between the two groups which demonstrates that learners who were exposed to intensive skills-based textbooks showed better performance.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박선옥, "형태와 기능 통합 한국어 교재 개선 방안 연구" 한성대학교 한성어문학회 32 : 367-399, 2013

      2 장미라, "한국어 초급 교재에 나타난 읽기 교육의 내용과 방법의 변천 연구" 한국언어문학회 (78) : 543-565, 2011

      3 김정숙, "한국어 읽기· 쓰기 교재 개발 방안 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 15 (15): 1-21, 2004

      4 이정희, "한국어 읽기 교육과정 개발 연구 보고서" 국립국어원 2015

      5 김현정, "통합적 기능 향상을 위한 읽기, 듣기 수업모델-Intensive 과정의 1 급을 중심으로-" 국제한국어교육학회 89-91, 1999

      6 이정희, "내용중심 한국어교육과정 수립을 위한 기초 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 14 (14): 9-232, 2003

      7 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어교육 표준 모형 개발 연구 보고서" 국립국어원 2010

      8 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어교육 표준 모형 2단계 사업 보고서" 국립국어원 2011

      9 이정희, "경희한국어 읽기6" 도서출판 하우 2015

      10 이정희, "경희한국어 읽기5" 도서출판 하우 2015

      1 박선옥, "형태와 기능 통합 한국어 교재 개선 방안 연구" 한성대학교 한성어문학회 32 : 367-399, 2013

      2 장미라, "한국어 초급 교재에 나타난 읽기 교육의 내용과 방법의 변천 연구" 한국언어문학회 (78) : 543-565, 2011

      3 김정숙, "한국어 읽기· 쓰기 교재 개발 방안 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 15 (15): 1-21, 2004

      4 이정희, "한국어 읽기 교육과정 개발 연구 보고서" 국립국어원 2015

      5 김현정, "통합적 기능 향상을 위한 읽기, 듣기 수업모델-Intensive 과정의 1 급을 중심으로-" 국제한국어교육학회 89-91, 1999

      6 이정희, "내용중심 한국어교육과정 수립을 위한 기초 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 14 (14): 9-232, 2003

      7 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어교육 표준 모형 개발 연구 보고서" 국립국어원 2010

      8 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어교육 표준 모형 2단계 사업 보고서" 국립국어원 2011

      9 이정희, "경희한국어 읽기6" 도서출판 하우 2015

      10 이정희, "경희한국어 읽기5" 도서출판 하우 2015

      11 이정희, "경희한국어 읽기4" 도서출판 하우 2015

      12 김중섭, "경희한국어 읽기3" 도서출판 하우 2014

      13 김중섭, "경희한국어 읽기2" 도서출판 하우 2014

      14 김중섭, "경희한국어 읽기1" 도서출판 하우 2014

      15 Smith, Frank, "Understanding Reading" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1994

      16 Krashen, Stephen D., "The Input hypothesis: Issues and Implication" Longman 1985

      17 Hedge, Tricia, "Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom" Oxford University Press 2000

      18 Omaggio, Alice C., "Teaching Language in Context" Heinle&Heinle 2000

      19 Bloom, B. S., "Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I Cognitive Domain" David Kckay Company, Inc 1956

      20 Neil Anderson, "Reading. Practical English Language Teaching" McGraw Hill 2003

      21 Nunan, David, "Practical English language teaching" McGraw Hill 2003

      22 Tomlinson, Brian, "Materials Development in Language Teaching Second Edition" Cambridge University Press 1998

      23 Ausbel, David P., "Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View" Holt, Rinehart & Winston 1968

      24 Freeman, Yvenne S., "ESL/EFL Teaching: Principles for Success" Heinemann 1998

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-10-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국어 교육 -> 한국어교육 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.88 0.88 0.94
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.95 1.03 1.37 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼