RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일본에서의 음악 저작권 관리 단체의 현상 = The Current Situation of the Collective Management Organizations in Japan

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      1. In Japan, collective management organizations include JASRAC and some of the organizations. Historically, when Law on Intermediary Business Concerning Copyright was enacted, the collective management organization had to be approved by the government. Under the regime of this Law, only 1 organization, in principle, could be permitted depending on the type of copyrighted works. Following the enactment of the Law on Management Business of Copyright and Neighboring Rights, another collective management organization could be approved by the government and emerged. Prior to the enactment of the Law on Management Business of Copyright and Neighboring Rights, the only collective management organization for music had been JASRAC for 60 years. 2. When the JASRAC collected the music royalties on the use of broadcasts, JASRAC multiplied by a percentage of revenue in the broadcasting profits regardless of whether the music was used and how many times the music was used. It was the comprehensive collective management. However, it was considered “private monopoly” of Article 2 (5) of the Antimonopoly Act of Japan §2 ⑤. Also, it was the issue as to whether it was the violation of Article 3 of the Antimonopoly Act of Japan. The Japanese Fair Trade Commission gave the retraction order to JASRAC but the Commission ruled out the retraction order. Afterwards, Tokyo High Court cancelled the ruling of the Fair Trade Commission of Japan. The Japanese Supreme Court also supported the Tokyo High Court’s judgement. 3. Based on the Japanese Supreme Court``s holding, the broadcasting organizations and the collective management organizations including JASRAC have reviewed and discussed the royalty system depending upon the percentage of music use in broadcast. Also, Avex Group Holdings Ltd. Corp. purchased the stock of Japan Rights Clearance Inc and E-license(the main collective management organization in Japan) using by Avex Music Publishing Inc., its subsidiary company. Avex Group announced that it will discuss the integration of the two companies`` businesses and it was reported that it will use E-license instead of entrusting most of their property rights to JASRAC in terms of 100,000 musics of theirs. 4. Consequently, the collective management organizations will compete with each other. Also, new services about the digital contents will emerge, resulting in active changes of and competition among, collective management organizations.
      번역하기

      1. In Japan, collective management organizations include JASRAC and some of the organizations. Historically, when Law on Intermediary Business Concerning Copyright was enacted, the collective management organization had to be approved by the governmen...

      1. In Japan, collective management organizations include JASRAC and some of the organizations. Historically, when Law on Intermediary Business Concerning Copyright was enacted, the collective management organization had to be approved by the government. Under the regime of this Law, only 1 organization, in principle, could be permitted depending on the type of copyrighted works. Following the enactment of the Law on Management Business of Copyright and Neighboring Rights, another collective management organization could be approved by the government and emerged. Prior to the enactment of the Law on Management Business of Copyright and Neighboring Rights, the only collective management organization for music had been JASRAC for 60 years. 2. When the JASRAC collected the music royalties on the use of broadcasts, JASRAC multiplied by a percentage of revenue in the broadcasting profits regardless of whether the music was used and how many times the music was used. It was the comprehensive collective management. However, it was considered “private monopoly” of Article 2 (5) of the Antimonopoly Act of Japan §2 ⑤. Also, it was the issue as to whether it was the violation of Article 3 of the Antimonopoly Act of Japan. The Japanese Fair Trade Commission gave the retraction order to JASRAC but the Commission ruled out the retraction order. Afterwards, Tokyo High Court cancelled the ruling of the Fair Trade Commission of Japan. The Japanese Supreme Court also supported the Tokyo High Court’s judgement. 3. Based on the Japanese Supreme Court``s holding, the broadcasting organizations and the collective management organizations including JASRAC have reviewed and discussed the royalty system depending upon the percentage of music use in broadcast. Also, Avex Group Holdings Ltd. Corp. purchased the stock of Japan Rights Clearance Inc and E-license(the main collective management organization in Japan) using by Avex Music Publishing Inc., its subsidiary company. Avex Group announced that it will discuss the integration of the two companies`` businesses and it was reported that it will use E-license instead of entrusting most of their property rights to JASRAC in terms of 100,000 musics of theirs. 4. Consequently, the collective management organizations will compete with each other. Also, new services about the digital contents will emerge, resulting in active changes of and competition among, collective management organizations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼