The purpose of this thesis is to expiscate that junzi(君子) and xiaoren(小人) in the Analects of Confucius are progressive human who have orienting for the growth and the retrogression. So far, the research for junzi in academic world was so simpl...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100246005
2014
-
100
KCI등재
학술저널
37-68(32쪽)
5
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The purpose of this thesis is to expiscate that junzi(君子) and xiaoren(小人) in the Analects of Confucius are progressive human who have orienting for the growth and the retrogression. So far, the research for junzi in academic world was so simpl...
The purpose of this thesis is to expiscate that junzi(君子) and xiaoren(小人) in the Analects of Confucius are progressive human who have orienting for the growth and the retrogression. So far, the research for junzi in academic world was so simple structure which listed items of virtue as moral obligation and gave an advice for the discipline one`s mind to obtain them. That kind of research has been contributed by succeeding to give an image of junzi, but It is hard to acknowledge only for the image itself to present overall understanding of junzi. Because junzi is not a final model who became a perfect human being but a human being who is in the progress toward orienting completion of himself. And xiaoren in opposite side is also progressive human being. We can see good diagram of The progressive human being in ``The heart of man`` by Erich Fromm. He presents diagram that human`s mind changes to growth syndrome or deterioration syndrome depends on three kinds of orienting. This thesis has been completed the diagram of relationship between junzi, xiaoren, and a middle person(zhongren;中人) by refering Erich Fromm`s diagram. I`ve placed the middle person who could be considered an average person in the center, from there the human who has orienting the growth toward upside are considered junzi, the human who has orienting the deterioration toward downward are considered xiaoren. And the human who reached to the highest level is called saint, the human who reached to the limit of lowest level is called tyrannizer. And I enhance the validity of the diagram of relationship by putting forward three orientations which determine the direction for growth or deterioration. The three orienting for the growth are renyi[仁義;humanity and righteousness], liyue[禮樂; propriety and music], xuexi[學習;learning], for the retrogression are buren[不仁; inhumanity], feili[非禮; uncourteous], abandon oneself were presented. we can get new point of view for junzi and xiaoren through this diagram of the relationship. The first, we can get a point of view that junzi is not a final model who became a perfect human being but a human being who is in the progress toward orienting completion of himself. The second, we can emphasis not only for the importance of junzi but also the dangerousness of xiaoren. The third, we can the point of view to focuss on the middle person who moves up and down between orienting the growth and the retrogression.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이택후, "중국미학사" 대한교과서주식회사 1992
2 신정근, "전통청바지, 옛것은 과연 낡은 것일까?" 웅진지식하우스 2007
3 에리히 프롬, "인간의 마음" 문예출판사 2004
4 김태오, "순자의 군자관과 그 교육방안" 1994
5 신용석, "사서를 통해 본 군자상" 10 : 1992
6 맹자, "맹자"
7 주희, "논어집주"
8 공자, "논어"
9 정순묵, "교육의 역사적 기초" 대은출판사 1982
10 최대우, "공자의 군자사상에 대한 일고찰" 전남대학교 인문과학연구소 12 : 1982
1 이택후, "중국미학사" 대한교과서주식회사 1992
2 신정근, "전통청바지, 옛것은 과연 낡은 것일까?" 웅진지식하우스 2007
3 에리히 프롬, "인간의 마음" 문예출판사 2004
4 김태오, "순자의 군자관과 그 교육방안" 1994
5 신용석, "사서를 통해 본 군자상" 10 : 1992
6 맹자, "맹자"
7 주희, "논어집주"
8 공자, "논어"
9 정순묵, "교육의 역사적 기초" 대은출판사 1982
10 최대우, "공자의 군자사상에 대한 일고찰" 전남대학교 인문과학연구소 12 : 1982
11 정종복, "孔子之君子思想硏究" 청주대학교 13 (13): 1980
12 이경남, "『論語』에 나타난 小人에 관한 硏究" 동양철학연구회 32 : 153-182, 2003
장재(張載)의 “대심(大心)” 공부론과 주자(朱子)의 비판 - 격물치지(格物致知)와 연관하여 -
주자(朱子), 적생조래(荻生조徠), 정약용(丁若鏞)의『논어(論語)』해석(解釋)의 차이(差異)(1) - 공야장(公冶長)을 중심(中心)으로 -
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-05-31 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 동양철학연구(Journal of Eastern Philosophy) -> 동양철학연구외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Eastern Philosophy | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.59 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.55 | 0.54 | 1.394 | 0.1 |