RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Empirical Analysis on Rao-Scott First Order Adjustment for Two Population Homogeneity test Based on Stratified Three-Stage Cluster Sampling with PPS

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104955432

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      National-wide and/or large scale sample surveys generally use complex sample design. Traditional Pearson chi-square test isnot appropriate for the categorical complex sample data. Rao-Scott suggested an adjustment method for Pearson chi-square test,which uses the average of eigenvalues of design matrix of cell probabilities. This study is to compare the efficiency of Rao-Scottfirst order adjusted test to Wald test for homogeneity between two populations using 2009 Gyeongnam regional educationoffices's customer satisfaction survey (2009 GREOCSS) data. The 2009 GREOCSS data were collected based on stratifiedthree-stage cluster sampling with probability proportional to size. The empirical results show that the Rao-Scott adjusted teststatistic using only the variances of cell probabilities is very close to the Wald test statistic, which uses the covariance matrix ofcell probabilities, under the 2009 GREOCSS data based. However it is necessary to be cautious to use the Rao-Scott first orderadjusted test statistic in the place of Wald test because its efficiency is decreasing as the relative variance of eigenvalues of thedesign matrix of cell probabilities is increasing, specially more when the number of degrees of freedom is small.
      번역하기

      National-wide and/or large scale sample surveys generally use complex sample design. Traditional Pearson chi-square test isnot appropriate for the categorical complex sample data. Rao-Scott suggested an adjustment method for Pearson chi-square test,wh...

      National-wide and/or large scale sample surveys generally use complex sample design. Traditional Pearson chi-square test isnot appropriate for the categorical complex sample data. Rao-Scott suggested an adjustment method for Pearson chi-square test,which uses the average of eigenvalues of design matrix of cell probabilities. This study is to compare the efficiency of Rao-Scottfirst order adjusted test to Wald test for homogeneity between two populations using 2009 Gyeongnam regional educationoffices's customer satisfaction survey (2009 GREOCSS) data. The 2009 GREOCSS data were collected based on stratifiedthree-stage cluster sampling with probability proportional to size. The empirical results show that the Rao-Scott adjusted teststatistic using only the variances of cell probabilities is very close to the Wald test statistic, which uses the covariance matrix ofcell probabilities, under the 2009 GREOCSS data based. However it is necessary to be cautious to use the Rao-Scott first orderadjusted test statistic in the place of Wald test because its efficiency is decreasing as the relative variance of eigenvalues of thedesign matrix of cell probabilities is increasing, specially more when the number of degrees of freedom is small.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 허순영, "지역교육청 수요자 만족도조사를 위한 표본설계에 관한 연구" 한국데이터정보과학회 21 (21): 669-679, 2010

      2 허순영, "복합표본자료에서 동질성검정을 위한 피어슨 검정통계량의 효과" 한국데이터정보과학회 23 (23): 757-764, 2012

      3 J. N. K. Rao, "The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys : Chi-squared tests for goodness of fit the independence in two-way tables" 76 : 221-230, 1981

      4 D. R. Thomas, "Small-sample comparisons of level and power for simple goodness-of-fit statistics under cluster sampling" 82 : 630-636, 1987

      5 J. N. K. Rao, "On simple adjustments to chi-square tests with sample survey data" 15 : 385-397, 1987

      6 J. N. K. Rao, "On chi-squared test for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data" 12 : 46-60, 1984

      7 D. Holt, "Chi-squared tests with survey data" 143 : 302-320, 1980

      8 Y. Chung, "2009 Customer satisfaction evaluation survey to the service from Gyeongsangnam-do regional offices of education" Changwon National University 2009

      1 허순영, "지역교육청 수요자 만족도조사를 위한 표본설계에 관한 연구" 한국데이터정보과학회 21 (21): 669-679, 2010

      2 허순영, "복합표본자료에서 동질성검정을 위한 피어슨 검정통계량의 효과" 한국데이터정보과학회 23 (23): 757-764, 2012

      3 J. N. K. Rao, "The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys : Chi-squared tests for goodness of fit the independence in two-way tables" 76 : 221-230, 1981

      4 D. R. Thomas, "Small-sample comparisons of level and power for simple goodness-of-fit statistics under cluster sampling" 82 : 630-636, 1987

      5 J. N. K. Rao, "On simple adjustments to chi-square tests with sample survey data" 15 : 385-397, 1987

      6 J. N. K. Rao, "On chi-squared test for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data" 12 : 46-60, 1984

      7 D. Holt, "Chi-squared tests with survey data" 143 : 302-320, 1980

      8 Y. Chung, "2009 Customer satisfaction evaluation survey to the service from Gyeongsangnam-do regional offices of education" Changwon National University 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.25 0.24 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼