RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      근대지식, 교육과 문학 = Modern Knowledge, Education, and Literature

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104457548

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article is on the formation of modern literature in the system of modern knowledge. Until now, One has studied around change of literature concept in the modern literature. so to speak, Modern literature has been viewed that it stemmed from premodern literature, and was a evolutionary process of itself.
      But, this article holds that it was a result of reorganization on knowledge system in the late 19th century-the early 20th century. Education made a important roll in this reorganization process. National education was presented as a part of nation building, as a result, woman and child was brought into relief. Modern literature had something to do with discovery of woman and child, that is, a new understanding of man.
      Chinese humanics in the early 20th century, was studied from three departments of modern knowledge. This was expressed as intellectual education, moral education, physical education and aesthetic education in the education. In the beginning, one paid close attention to literature as a part of intellectual education, of which the objects was generally woman and child. But, before long, one began to recognize that literature had a unique characteristics, and that it was very important in modern education and the building of modern subject. Meanwhile, this change of the topology of literature happened in connection with system of modern knowledge: sociology, educational psychology, anthropology etc.
      Liang Qichao and Yan Fu attached great importance to knowledge education from sociology. But Wang Guowei and Zhou Zuoren contrastively laid emphasis on aesthetic education and moral education, who approached them from each educational psychology and anthropology. In conclusion, we can confirm that modern literature is the result reconstructed in modern educational system.
      번역하기

      This article is on the formation of modern literature in the system of modern knowledge. Until now, One has studied around change of literature concept in the modern literature. so to speak, Modern literature has been viewed that it stemmed from premo...

      This article is on the formation of modern literature in the system of modern knowledge. Until now, One has studied around change of literature concept in the modern literature. so to speak, Modern literature has been viewed that it stemmed from premodern literature, and was a evolutionary process of itself.
      But, this article holds that it was a result of reorganization on knowledge system in the late 19th century-the early 20th century. Education made a important roll in this reorganization process. National education was presented as a part of nation building, as a result, woman and child was brought into relief. Modern literature had something to do with discovery of woman and child, that is, a new understanding of man.
      Chinese humanics in the early 20th century, was studied from three departments of modern knowledge. This was expressed as intellectual education, moral education, physical education and aesthetic education in the education. In the beginning, one paid close attention to literature as a part of intellectual education, of which the objects was generally woman and child. But, before long, one began to recognize that literature had a unique characteristics, and that it was very important in modern education and the building of modern subject. Meanwhile, this change of the topology of literature happened in connection with system of modern knowledge: sociology, educational psychology, anthropology etc.
      Liang Qichao and Yan Fu attached great importance to knowledge education from sociology. But Wang Guowei and Zhou Zuoren contrastively laid emphasis on aesthetic education and moral education, who approached them from each educational psychology and anthropology. In conclusion, we can confirm that modern literature is the result reconstructed in modern educational system.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 崔熔燮, "헤르바르트 敎育學硏究" 朝鮮大學校 出版局 1997

      2 필립 아리에스, "아동의 탄생" 새물결 2003

      3 우메네 사또루, "근대교육사상비판" 남녘 1988

      4 "辛亥革命前十年間時論選集" 三聯書店 3 :

      5 "變法通義ㆍ學校總論" 時務報 1896.9.17

      6 嚴複, "論育與國家之關系" 3 : 1906.4

      7 "論敎育當定宗旨" 新民總報 (2) : 1902.2.8

      8 王國維, "論敎育之宗旨" (56) : 1903.8

      9 "論小說與群治之關係" (1) : 1902.11.14

      10 "論學校六: 女學" 時務報 5 : 1897.5

      1 崔熔燮, "헤르바르트 敎育學硏究" 朝鮮大學校 出版局 1997

      2 필립 아리에스, "아동의 탄생" 새물결 2003

      3 우메네 사또루, "근대교육사상비판" 남녘 1988

      4 "辛亥革命前十年間時論選集" 三聯書店 3 :

      5 "變法通義ㆍ學校總論" 時務報 1896.9.17

      6 嚴複, "論育與國家之關系" 3 : 1906.4

      7 "論敎育當定宗旨" 新民總報 (2) : 1902.2.8

      8 王國維, "論敎育之宗旨" (56) : 1903.8

      9 "論小說與群治之關係" (1) : 1902.11.14

      10 "論學校六: 女學" 時務報 5 : 1897.5

      11 梁啓超, "論學校五: 幼學" 時務報 16-19 : 1897.1.3

      12 今野三, "明治20年代のヘルパルト主義育思想--ハウスクネヒトㆍ門下生の著作の討を中心に" 17 : 1983

      13 新民叢報, "敎育政策私議" 新民叢報 (8) : 1902.5.22

      14 梁啓超, "敎育政策私議" 新民叢報 (8) : 1902.5.22

      15 王國維, "敎育偶感四則" 中國文史出版社 3 :

      16 劉半農, "我之文學改良觀" 3 (3): 1917.5

      17 鍾叔河, "周作人文類編⑤: 上下身-性學, 兒童, 婦女" 湖南文藝出版社 1998

      18 鍾叔河, "周作人文類編③: 本色-文學, 文章, 文化" 湖南文藝出版社 1998

      19 王國維, "叔本華之哲學及其敎育學說" (77) : 1904.6

      20 周一平, "中西文化交與王國維學術成就" 學林出版社 1999

      21 湯志鈞, "中國近代敎育史資料彙編(戊戌時期敎育)" 上海敎育出版社 1993

      22 Herbrt Spencor, "世界敎育學選集 50: 知育, 德育, 體育論" -50, 1969

      23 Benjamin Isadore Schwartz, "In search of wealth and power: Yen Fu and the West" Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1964

      24 Spencer, Herbert, "Education: intellectual, moral, and physical" New York: D. Appleton 1860

      25 J.F. 헤르바르트, "(헤르바르트의)일반교육학" 학지사 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.44 0.44 0.36
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.34 0.589 0.43
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼