RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      연구논문 : 재생가능에너지 의무할당제의 이론과 실제: RPS 도입국가들에 대한 분석을 바탕으로 = Theory and Practice of Renewable Portfolio Standards: Based on an Analysis of Nations with RPS

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82690046

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Most countries have implemented renewable energy expansion policies in order to respond to climate change, strengthen energy security, and create job opportunities. This paper aims to identify conditions for successful renewable expansion by renewable portfolio standards (RPS) which is planned to be adopted by Korea in 2012, while carrying out a comparative case study for countries with RPS. For this purpose, five cases including the state of California, the state of Texas, Sweden, UK and Japan were selected and their historical achievement were analyzed in terms of expansion rates of RES-E, observance of mandatory quotas and cost-effectiveness. As a result, different from theoretical legitimacy, RPS was successful in only three cases such as the state of California, the State of Texas, and Sweden, other two cases such as the UK and Japan were not successful. This paper found the fact that sucess and failure of RPS depend on the scale and characteristics of renewables of individual country and institutional design of RPS. Consequently, RPS may achieve its policy goal only when these conditions are satisfied. This implies that Korea which does not have large-scale renewable sources needs to reconsider introduction of RPS or to complement RPS policy design for efficient renewable energy expansion.
      번역하기

      Most countries have implemented renewable energy expansion policies in order to respond to climate change, strengthen energy security, and create job opportunities. This paper aims to identify conditions for successful renewable expansion by renewable...

      Most countries have implemented renewable energy expansion policies in order to respond to climate change, strengthen energy security, and create job opportunities. This paper aims to identify conditions for successful renewable expansion by renewable portfolio standards (RPS) which is planned to be adopted by Korea in 2012, while carrying out a comparative case study for countries with RPS. For this purpose, five cases including the state of California, the state of Texas, Sweden, UK and Japan were selected and their historical achievement were analyzed in terms of expansion rates of RES-E, observance of mandatory quotas and cost-effectiveness. As a result, different from theoretical legitimacy, RPS was successful in only three cases such as the state of California, the State of Texas, and Sweden, other two cases such as the UK and Japan were not successful. This paper found the fact that sucess and failure of RPS depend on the scale and characteristics of renewables of individual country and institutional design of RPS. Consequently, RPS may achieve its policy goal only when these conditions are satisfied. This implies that Korea which does not have large-scale renewable sources needs to reconsider introduction of RPS or to complement RPS policy design for efficient renewable energy expansion.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 손성호, "해외 신재생에너지 의무할당제 시행사례 분석" 441-443, 2008

      2 윤순진, "지속가능한 에너지체제로의 전환을 위한 에너지정책 개선방향: 재생가능에너지관련법・제도에 대한 비판적 검토룰 바탕으로" 14 (14): 269-300, 2003

      3 이창호, "주요국의 신재생에너지 의무할당제(RPS) 운영사례" 59 (59): 22-27, 2010

      4 홍정희, "재생가능에너지 활성화 정책 수단의 변경 타당성에 관한 연구: 발전차액 지원제도와 발전의무할당제도를 중심으로" 서울대학교 환경대학원 2009

      5 윤순진, "재생가능에너지 산업을 통한 일자리 창출 에너지・환경・고용의 선순환" 131 : 20-27, 2008

      6 김규판, "일본정부의 태양광발전 지원체계 및 시사점" 3 (3): 2-13, 2009

      7 대한무역투자진흥공사, "일본 신재생에너지 산업 현황 및 전망" 2010

      8 외환은행, "외환은행,2011"

      9 최현경, "신・재생에너지 의무할당제도(RPS)와 발전차액지원제도(FIT)의 비교와 시사점" (1월) : 26-38, 2009

      10 이창호, "신・재생에너지 의무할당제 (RPS) 시행방안 및 효과분석" 13-37, 2010

      1 손성호, "해외 신재생에너지 의무할당제 시행사례 분석" 441-443, 2008

      2 윤순진, "지속가능한 에너지체제로의 전환을 위한 에너지정책 개선방향: 재생가능에너지관련법・제도에 대한 비판적 검토룰 바탕으로" 14 (14): 269-300, 2003

      3 이창호, "주요국의 신재생에너지 의무할당제(RPS) 운영사례" 59 (59): 22-27, 2010

      4 홍정희, "재생가능에너지 활성화 정책 수단의 변경 타당성에 관한 연구: 발전차액 지원제도와 발전의무할당제도를 중심으로" 서울대학교 환경대학원 2009

      5 윤순진, "재생가능에너지 산업을 통한 일자리 창출 에너지・환경・고용의 선순환" 131 : 20-27, 2008

      6 김규판, "일본정부의 태양광발전 지원체계 및 시사점" 3 (3): 2-13, 2009

      7 대한무역투자진흥공사, "일본 신재생에너지 산업 현황 및 전망" 2010

      8 외환은행, "외환은행,2011"

      9 최현경, "신・재생에너지 의무할당제도(RPS)와 발전차액지원제도(FIT)의 비교와 시사점" (1월) : 26-38, 2009

      10 이창호, "신・재생에너지 의무할당제 (RPS) 시행방안 및 효과분석" 13-37, 2010

      11 이창호, "신재생에너지 의무할당제(RPS) 국내운영방안수립" 2009

      12 성낙환, "신재생에너지 의무할당제 영향과 기업의 대응" LG Business Insight 36-42, 2008

      13 한국농촌경제연구원, "선진국 농업부문 바이오매스 이용활성화 정책과 시사" 2006

      14 산림청, "산림기본통계" 2010

      15 윤순진, "대규모 조력발전, 정말 친환경인가" (406) : 6-7, 2010

      16 The Leaf Exchange, "http://www.theleafexchange.com"

      17 SRECTrade, "http://www.srectrade.com/index.php"

      18 Spectron Group Limited, "http://www.spectrongroup.com/market-data/market_analysis_RES/2011.php"

      19 河野太郞, "http://korean.konotaro.org/2011/01/2011-01-07.php"

      20 Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, "UK Renewable Energy Strategy Consultation" Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 2008

      21 International Energy Agency, "Trends in photovoltaic applications survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2009" IEA 2010

      22 Verhaegen, K., "Towards an international tradable green certificate system: The challenging example of Belgium" 13 (13): 208-215, 2009

      23 Gross, R., "Time to stop experimenting with UK renewable energy policy, in ICEPT Working Paper" 2010

      24 Commission of the European Communities, "The support of electricity from renewable energy sources - Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewables sources" CEC 57-, 2008

      25 Swedish Energy Agency, "The electricity certificate system 2009, in ET2009: 40" Swedish Energy Agency 2009

      26 Buckman, G., "The effectiveness of Renewable Portfolio Standard banding and carve-outs in supporting high-cost types of renewable electricity" Energy Policy, in Press 2011

      27 European Commission, "The Support of renewable Energy Sources" 2005

      28 Department of Energy, USA, 2011, Renewable Energy, "Texas Renewable Profile"

      29 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, "State of the World's Forests" 2009

      30 Energy Information Agency, "State Electricity Profiles 2008" EIA 2010

      31 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation" 2011

      32 California Energy Commission, "Renewables Portfolio Standard 2006 Procurement Verification" 2010

      33 United Kingdom, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, "Renewables Obligation Annual Report 2009-2010" OFGEM 2011

      34 United Kingdom, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, "Renewables Obligation Annual Report 2007-2008" OFGEM 2009

      35 Mitchell, C., "Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990-2003" 32 (32): 1935-1947, 2004

      36 Iida, T., "Renewable energy policy and politics in Japan" ISEP 2007

      37 International Energy Agency, "Renewable Information 2010" IEA 2010

      38 Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, "Renewable Global Status Report" REN21 2010

      39 Sovacool, B., "Renewable Energy: Economically Sound, Politically Difficult" 21 (21): 18-29, 2008

      40 조인승, "RPS시스템에서의 목표량부여방식 및 적용사례" 264-266, 2007

      41 California Public Utilities Commision, "RPS Compliance Report"

      42 Lauber, V., "REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised Community framework" 32 (32): 1405-1414, 2004

      43 Menanteau, P., "Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy" 3 (3): 799-812, 2003

      44 Horiuchi, C., "One policy makes no difference" 29 : 432-449, 2007

      45 Schneider, M., "Nuclear Power in a Post-Fukushima World: 25 Years After Chernobyl Accident" Worldwatch Institute 2011

      46 Ito, Y., "Newbuyback program for photovoltaic generation : Issue in the view of electric utilities industry policy"

      47 Lipp, J., "Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and United Kingdom" 35 (35): 5481-5495, 2007

      48 UNEP, "Green Jobs: Towards decent work in a sustainable, low-carbon world, in Review of International Experience with Renewable Energy Obligation Support Mechanisms" Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands Petten 2008

      49 Global Wind Energy Council, "Global wind energy outlook 2010" GWEC 2010

      50 이민식, "FIT와 RPS 제도비교 시사점" 산은경제연구소 2009

      51 Wiser, R., "Evaluating experience with renewable portfolio standards in the United States" Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory 2004

      52 International Energy Agency, "Electricity Information" IEA 2006

      53 International Energy Agency, "Electricity Information" IEA 2010

      54 Jacobsson, S., "EU renewable energy support policy: Faith or facts" 37 (37): 2143-2146, 2009

      55 International Energy Agency, "Deploying Renewables-Principles for Effective Policies" IEA 2008

      56 North Carolina Solar Center, "Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency"

      57 IPCC, "Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat 2007

      58 Jacobs, D., "Best Practice Examples -Quota Obligations and Tender Schemes" OSCE 2009

      59 Bergek, A., "Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003-2008" 38 (38): 1255-1271, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2016-03-02 통합 KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.65 0.65 0.79
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.71 0.67 0.964 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼