RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선후기 평민 동성촌락의 성장 = Development of a Commoner Single-Lineage Village in the Late Joseon Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99554378

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Today traces of a single-lineage village remains in places in Korea, and an investigation in 1930s also revealed that villages corresponding to almost half the total were single-lineage villages. It is difficult to explain such a phenomenon from the viewpoint in the late Joseaon Dynasty that a single-lineage village is regarded as a nobility one and a non-single-lineage village is a commoners` village. A single-lineage village does not occur only among the nobility(Yangban), so that after the 19th century, there began to appear many cases even among non-nobility classes where they took the leadership of a village by accepting agnate order and through collective living of the single-lineage people. The common people, during their collective living, controlled a marriage of the same surname & family origin to which the nobility already adhered and formed their own circle to offer marriage. However, their circle to offer marriage or living is narrower than the nobility, mostly concentrated on a single-lineage village and its surrounding. They positively made efforts for increasing their social position in line with formation of their single-lineage villages. The earliest generation of the people who formed single-lineage villages consisted of commoners and servants, but after the middle 18th century, the village members increased in their position to the middle class, and almost to the upper class by the late 19th century, all of which resulted from formation of a strong paternal group. Some of the common people in the late Joseon Dynasty positively accepted family culture established by the nobility, while they attempted to advance their social position by collectively living in a certain village. All of such efforts did not give all the groups success. But, it is difficult to deny the fact that it resulted from the common people`s continuous efforts for a long time that the tendency of the single-lineage people collectively living appeared in lots of villages in modern times.
      번역하기

      Today traces of a single-lineage village remains in places in Korea, and an investigation in 1930s also revealed that villages corresponding to almost half the total were single-lineage villages. It is difficult to explain such a phenomenon from the v...

      Today traces of a single-lineage village remains in places in Korea, and an investigation in 1930s also revealed that villages corresponding to almost half the total were single-lineage villages. It is difficult to explain such a phenomenon from the viewpoint in the late Joseaon Dynasty that a single-lineage village is regarded as a nobility one and a non-single-lineage village is a commoners` village. A single-lineage village does not occur only among the nobility(Yangban), so that after the 19th century, there began to appear many cases even among non-nobility classes where they took the leadership of a village by accepting agnate order and through collective living of the single-lineage people. The common people, during their collective living, controlled a marriage of the same surname & family origin to which the nobility already adhered and formed their own circle to offer marriage. However, their circle to offer marriage or living is narrower than the nobility, mostly concentrated on a single-lineage village and its surrounding. They positively made efforts for increasing their social position in line with formation of their single-lineage villages. The earliest generation of the people who formed single-lineage villages consisted of commoners and servants, but after the middle 18th century, the village members increased in their position to the middle class, and almost to the upper class by the late 19th century, all of which resulted from formation of a strong paternal group. Some of the common people in the late Joseon Dynasty positively accepted family culture established by the nobility, while they attempted to advance their social position by collectively living in a certain village. All of such efforts did not give all the groups success. But, it is difficult to deny the fact that it resulted from the common people`s continuous efforts for a long time that the tendency of the single-lineage people collectively living appeared in lots of villages in modern times.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권내현, "조선후기 호적과 족보를 통한 동성촌락의 복원" 대동문화연구원 (47) : 1-33, 2004

      2 권내현, "조선후기 입양의 확산 추이와 수용 양상" 한국역사연구회 (73) : 201-232, 2009

      3 심재우, "조선후기 단성현 법물야면 유학호의 분포와 성격" 한국역사연구회 41 : 2001

      4 이해준, "조선시기 촌락사회사" 민족문화사 1996

      5 金俊亨, "조선 후기 丹城縣法物面지역 村落의 변화" 국사편찬위원회 32 : 2001

      6 오영교, "강원의 동족마을" 집문당 2004

      7 "許廳案"

      8 "洞內穀物息利有司姓名冊"

      9 朴容淑, "朝鮮後期鄕村社會構造에 관한 硏究-18,19세기 同姓婚을 중심으로" 부산대사학회 8 : 1984

      10 金俊亨, "朝鮮後期丹城士族層硏究-사회변화와 사족층의 대응양상을 중심으로" 아세아문화사 2000

      1 권내현, "조선후기 호적과 족보를 통한 동성촌락의 복원" 대동문화연구원 (47) : 1-33, 2004

      2 권내현, "조선후기 입양의 확산 추이와 수용 양상" 한국역사연구회 (73) : 201-232, 2009

      3 심재우, "조선후기 단성현 법물야면 유학호의 분포와 성격" 한국역사연구회 41 : 2001

      4 이해준, "조선시기 촌락사회사" 민족문화사 1996

      5 金俊亨, "조선 후기 丹城縣法物面지역 村落의 변화" 국사편찬위원회 32 : 2001

      6 오영교, "강원의 동족마을" 집문당 2004

      7 "許廳案"

      8 "洞內穀物息利有司姓名冊"

      9 朴容淑, "朝鮮後期鄕村社會構造에 관한 硏究-18,19세기 同姓婚을 중심으로" 부산대사학회 8 : 1984

      10 金俊亨, "朝鮮後期丹城士族層硏究-사회변화와 사족층의 대응양상을 중심으로" 아세아문화사 2000

      11 善生永助, "朝鮮の聚落 後篇" 조선총독부 1933

      12 善生永助, "朝鮮の姓" 조선총독부 1934

      13 "慶尙道丹城縣戶籍大帳"

      14 崔允榛, "1930년대 朝鮮의 同族部落과 同族集團-丹城地域同族部落의 形成過程을 통해서 본 朝鮮後期鄕村社會의 단면" 전북대전라문화연구소 5 : 1992

      15 崔在錫, "17世紀初의 同姓婚-山蔭帳籍의 分析" 진단학회 46 : 1979

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Cultural Studies KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-06-18 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute of Korean Culture -> Research Institute of Korean Studies KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-18 학술지명변경 한글명 : 민족문화연구 29호 -> 민족문화연구 KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.7
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.71 0.7 1.385 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼