Performance comparison between bypass cycle and injection cycle for sub-cooling methods in multi-split variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system in hot seasons = Comparaison des performances en saisons chaudes d’un cycle à bipasse et d’un cycle à injection pour les procédés de sous-refroidissement dans les systèmes multi-split à débit de frigorigène variab

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>In this study, the performance of a multi-split VRF system using the bypass cycle and injection cycle is evaluated using the numerical simulation as a possible sub-cooling method to prevent flash gas generation in liquid pipelines. The simulation for the multi-split VRF system is developed by considering the applications of the bypass cycle and injection cycle, and is validated with experimental data. The bypass cycle and injection cycle in the multi-split VRF system yield improvements in their cooling capacities of the order of 3.22% and 13.43%, respectively, and energy efficient ratio (EER) of the order of 1.98% and 1.72%, respectively. The input power of the injection cycle is reduced by up to 4.45% when the performance of the multi-split VRF systems with bypass cycle and injection cycle is compared under the same cooling capacity conditions.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> The bypass cycle and injection cycle in a multi-split VRF system help increase the sub-cooling degree at inlet of EEV. </LI> <LI> Energy efficiency ratio (EER) of the multi-split VRF system increases with application of the bypass cycle and injection cycle. </LI> <LI> Performance of the VRF system with the injection cycle is more efficient under the same cooling capacity. </LI> </UL> </P>