RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Outcomes of Kidney Allograft and Recipient Survival After Liver Transplantation by Induction Type in the United States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O108049270

      • 저자
      • 발행기관
      • 학술지명
      • 권호사항
      • 발행연도

        2021년

      • 작성언어

        -

      • Print ISSN

        1527-6465

      • Online ISSN

        1527-6473

      • 등재정보

        SCOPUS;SCIE

      • 자료형태

        학술저널

      • 수록면

        1553-1562   [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]

      • 구독기관
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 성균관대학교 중앙학술정보관  
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 제주대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 중앙대학교 서울캠퍼스 중앙도서관  
        • 인천대학교 학산도서관  
        • 숙명여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 서강대학교 로욜라중앙도서관  
        • 계명대학교 동산도서관  
        • 충남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 한양대학교 백남학술정보관  
        • 이화여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 고려대학교 도서관  
      • ⓒ COPYRIGHT THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD: ALL RIGHT RESERVED
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There are several choices for induction immunosuppression in kidney‐after‐liver transplantation. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We assessed all kidney‐after‐liver transplant recipients in the United States between 1/1/2000 and 7/31/2017 to study kidney graft and patient outcomes by induction type. We only included patients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids and had a negative crossmatch before kidney engraftment. We grouped recipients by kidney induction type into the following 3 groups: depletional (n = 550), nondepletional (n = 434), and no antibody induction (n = 144). We studied patient and kidney allograft survival using Cox proportional hazard regression, with transplant center included as a random effect. Models were adjusted for liver induction regimen, recipient and donor age, sex, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, payor type, living donor kidney transplantation, dialysis status, time from liver engraftment, hepatitis C virus status, and the presence of diabetes mellitus at time of kidney transplantation and transplantation year. The 6‐month and 1‐year rejection rates did not differ between groups. Compared with no induction, neither depletional nor nondepletional induction was associated with an improved recipient or graft survival in the multivariable models. Depletional induction at the time of liver transplantation was associated with worse patient survival after kidney transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐2.67; P = 0.02). Living donor kidney transplantation was associated with a 48.1% improved graft survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33‐0.82; P = 0.00). In conclusion, in the settings of a negative cross‐match and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate, induction use was not associated with a patient or graft survival benefit in kidney‐after‐liver transplantations.
      번역하기

      There are several choices for induction immunosuppression in kidney‐after‐liver transplantation. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We assessed all kidney‐after‐liver transplant recipients in the United States b...

      There are several choices for induction immunosuppression in kidney‐after‐liver transplantation. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We assessed all kidney‐after‐liver transplant recipients in the United States between 1/1/2000 and 7/31/2017 to study kidney graft and patient outcomes by induction type. We only included patients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids and had a negative crossmatch before kidney engraftment. We grouped recipients by kidney induction type into the following 3 groups: depletional (n = 550), nondepletional (n = 434), and no antibody induction (n = 144). We studied patient and kidney allograft survival using Cox proportional hazard regression, with transplant center included as a random effect. Models were adjusted for liver induction regimen, recipient and donor age, sex, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, payor type, living donor kidney transplantation, dialysis status, time from liver engraftment, hepatitis C virus status, and the presence of diabetes mellitus at time of kidney transplantation and transplantation year. The 6‐month and 1‐year rejection rates did not differ between groups. Compared with no induction, neither depletional nor nondepletional induction was associated with an improved recipient or graft survival in the multivariable models. Depletional induction at the time of liver transplantation was associated with worse patient survival after kidney transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐2.67; P = 0.02). Living donor kidney transplantation was associated with a 48.1% improved graft survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33‐0.82; P = 0.00). In conclusion, in the settings of a negative cross‐match and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate, induction use was not associated with a patient or graft survival benefit in kidney‐after‐liver transplantations.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼