RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      An Analysis of the Legitimacy of Unilateral Economic Sanctions in International Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109685228

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      After the Cold War, waging wars abroad has been explicitly prohibited by international law. Since international law does not explicitly prohibit states from resorting to unilateral sanctions against other states, economic sanctions have become the primary choice of the world’s economic powers to achieve their foreign policies. The current implementation of many unilateral economic sanctions violates the basic norms of international law and generates many legal conflicts and disputes, further exacerbating international tensions. In addition, the imposition of unilateral economic sanctions has also caused humanitarian crises in the sanctioned states, posing significant human rights risks. The ethical legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions has also become a hot topic of discussion. The question of legality is a fundamental international law issue of unilateral sanctions, which has always been highly controversial. Legal acts are inevitably based on legality, but they should also satisfy the requirement of justification. Therefore, the connotation of the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions should include both “legality” and “justification”. Legality focuses on what fits within the law, while justification involves following moral and ethical requirements.
      Different types of unilateral economic sanctions can lead to different legal consequences. This article, taking into account the manifestations of economic sanctions in different areas of law, examines the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions under public international law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law. This article argues that the implementation of unilateral economic sanctions can only be recognized by the international community if they comply with the norms of international law and are justified by the ethics required by international human rights and humanitarian law. The application of economic sanctions in international political interactions will not diminish in the coming decades, and the question of the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions should not be avoided. We should actively promote the development and improvement of international rules on unilateral economic sanctions. Although there are still controversies and challenges in determining the legal boundaries of unilateral economic sanctions, only through the establishment of an effective legal mechanism can the abuse of sanctions be restricted and sanctions be used in a lawful and legitimate manner, thus giving full play to the true value of economic sanctions in curbing internationally wrongful acts.
      번역하기

      After the Cold War, waging wars abroad has been explicitly prohibited by international law. Since international law does not explicitly prohibit states from resorting to unilateral sanctions against other states, economic sanctions have become the pri...

      After the Cold War, waging wars abroad has been explicitly prohibited by international law. Since international law does not explicitly prohibit states from resorting to unilateral sanctions against other states, economic sanctions have become the primary choice of the world’s economic powers to achieve their foreign policies. The current implementation of many unilateral economic sanctions violates the basic norms of international law and generates many legal conflicts and disputes, further exacerbating international tensions. In addition, the imposition of unilateral economic sanctions has also caused humanitarian crises in the sanctioned states, posing significant human rights risks. The ethical legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions has also become a hot topic of discussion. The question of legality is a fundamental international law issue of unilateral sanctions, which has always been highly controversial. Legal acts are inevitably based on legality, but they should also satisfy the requirement of justification. Therefore, the connotation of the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions should include both “legality” and “justification”. Legality focuses on what fits within the law, while justification involves following moral and ethical requirements.
      Different types of unilateral economic sanctions can lead to different legal consequences. This article, taking into account the manifestations of economic sanctions in different areas of law, examines the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions under public international law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law. This article argues that the implementation of unilateral economic sanctions can only be recognized by the international community if they comply with the norms of international law and are justified by the ethics required by international human rights and humanitarian law. The application of economic sanctions in international political interactions will not diminish in the coming decades, and the question of the legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions should not be avoided. We should actively promote the development and improvement of international rules on unilateral economic sanctions. Although there are still controversies and challenges in determining the legal boundaries of unilateral economic sanctions, only through the establishment of an effective legal mechanism can the abuse of sanctions be restricted and sanctions be used in a lawful and legitimate manner, thus giving full play to the true value of economic sanctions in curbing internationally wrongful acts.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼