RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      5세기 초·중반 동아시아 국제질서의 재편과 고구려의 외교정책 = Changes in the East Asian International Order in the early to mid-5th century, and Goguryeo’s Diplomatic policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108193992

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Goguryeo’s policy in negotiating with China displayed a number of shifts in the early and mid-5th century. Till the early 420s it negotiated mainly with the Chinese Song(宋), then in the late 430s it began to seek out a relationship with the Northe...

      Goguryeo’s policy in negotiating with China displayed a number of shifts in the early and mid-5th century. Till the early 420s it negotiated mainly with the Chinese Song(宋), then in the late 430s it began to seek out a relationship with the Northern Wei(Buk’wi, 北魏). And from the 440s, after severing its relationship with Buk’wi, Goguryeo again dealt with Song.
      Recent studies seem to be interpreting all this as a result of Goguryeo’s intention to more effectively respond to specific threats coming from certain states such as Baekje or the Japanese Wae or of course Buk’wi. This is a perspective that views a state’s diplomatic policy as a tactic meant for a particular country or dynasty. Such perspective, however, may mislead us, and prevent us from seeing the true direction the Goguryeo policy was taking. In this article not only the Goguryeo state policy in foreign affairs but the international situations of the time as well are examined, and the result shows that Goguryeo was trying to navigate through the East Asian international situation as a whole, instead of trying to respond to individual threats.
      Through the early half of the 420s, Goguryeo conducted active diplomatic negotiations with Song, in order to deal with the international order of East Asia led by Song at the time. Then it discontinued such efforts, as the dynasty had to transfer its capital to the Pyeong’yang region. Then in 435 when the Northern Yan(Buk’yeon)’s collapse became imminent, Goguryeo forged a tributary/appointment relationship with Buk’wi, in order to address the more clear and present danger represented by it. Buk’wi, on the other hand, used its newly established amicable relationships with nearby states as a strategic asset in its policy of ‘uniting the region above the Yellow river,’ and continued its campaigns even after succeeding to do so. Goguryeo had no other choice but to reopen negotiations with Song or Rouran(Yuyeon) to face Buk’wi’s threat. So it negotiated with Song the prospect of mediated trades brokered by itself, and conducted trades with Southeast Asian countries or even Tuyuhun (Toyokhon) in the West, using the international network established by Song.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼