RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업집단 소속 공익법인 과세에 관한 고찰 ―상증세법상 의결권주식 과세를 중심으로― = A Study on the Taxation of Public Interest Corporations Belonging to a Business Conglomerate ― with Focus on the Taxation of Voting Stocks Under the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act ―

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108117882

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Voting stocks of a company donated to a public interest corporation tend to leave opportunities to control the company indirectly to the donor while they also serve as an important source of funding for the public interest activities of the public interest corporation. It has been one of the main issues of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act(‘the ITGTA’) since the year 1990 how much tax benefit has to be given to the holding of voting stocks by a public interest corporation in consideration of its two opposing aspects.
      With the history of the changes in the regulations, the experiences of foreign countries and the recent survey of the operation of public interest corporations taken into consideration, it would make more sense to adopt an approach to increase the business holding ratio as a means of increasing the public interest expenditure while monitoring the management of the public benefit corporation rather than to adopt an approach to set a strict limit to the business holding ratio under the presumption that the business holding will incur the adverse effect to the management of the public interest corporation.
      The ITGTA has regulated the business holding ratio of the public interest corporation belonging to a business conglomerate in a more strict way in comparison with that of other corporations since the year 1999.
      Because public interest corporations belonging to a business conglomerate tend to be positioned in a better financial circumstances, it would make sense to open the door wider for the donation of stocks of companies belonging to the same conglomerate and to encourage the public interest activities. Various studies and researches do not show that public interest corporations belonging to a business conglomerate tend to strengthen the concentration of economic power of the business conglomerate around the country as a whole.
      The Article 25 Paragraph 2 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(‘the MRFTA’) allows the voting rights up to 15 percent ― the holdings by its related parties have to be counted and added to its own holding ― of stocks issued by an affiliate company and held by a public interest corporation belonging to the same business conglomerate. Because the MRFTA which governs the control of the concentration of economic power to conglomerates sets the limit up to 15 percent, it is preferable for the ITGTA to accept such an regulation to avoid any inconsistency in the policies in this area. Pursuing private interest through self-dealing and reducing public interest expenditure may ensue in a heftier way if the business holding ratio is increased for public interest corporations belonging to a business conglomerate. These problems may be avoided by the new procedural solution to have public interest corporations to return an yearly file to report the fulfillment of the integrity requirements given in return for the increase of the business holding ratio.
      번역하기

      Voting stocks of a company donated to a public interest corporation tend to leave opportunities to control the company indirectly to the donor while they also serve as an important source of funding for the public interest activities of the public int...

      Voting stocks of a company donated to a public interest corporation tend to leave opportunities to control the company indirectly to the donor while they also serve as an important source of funding for the public interest activities of the public interest corporation. It has been one of the main issues of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act(‘the ITGTA’) since the year 1990 how much tax benefit has to be given to the holding of voting stocks by a public interest corporation in consideration of its two opposing aspects.
      With the history of the changes in the regulations, the experiences of foreign countries and the recent survey of the operation of public interest corporations taken into consideration, it would make more sense to adopt an approach to increase the business holding ratio as a means of increasing the public interest expenditure while monitoring the management of the public benefit corporation rather than to adopt an approach to set a strict limit to the business holding ratio under the presumption that the business holding will incur the adverse effect to the management of the public interest corporation.
      The ITGTA has regulated the business holding ratio of the public interest corporation belonging to a business conglomerate in a more strict way in comparison with that of other corporations since the year 1999.
      Because public interest corporations belonging to a business conglomerate tend to be positioned in a better financial circumstances, it would make sense to open the door wider for the donation of stocks of companies belonging to the same conglomerate and to encourage the public interest activities. Various studies and researches do not show that public interest corporations belonging to a business conglomerate tend to strengthen the concentration of economic power of the business conglomerate around the country as a whole.
      The Article 25 Paragraph 2 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(‘the MRFTA’) allows the voting rights up to 15 percent ― the holdings by its related parties have to be counted and added to its own holding ― of stocks issued by an affiliate company and held by a public interest corporation belonging to the same business conglomerate. Because the MRFTA which governs the control of the concentration of economic power to conglomerates sets the limit up to 15 percent, it is preferable for the ITGTA to accept such an regulation to avoid any inconsistency in the policies in this area. Pursuing private interest through self-dealing and reducing public interest expenditure may ensue in a heftier way if the business holding ratio is increased for public interest corporations belonging to a business conglomerate. These problems may be avoided by the new procedural solution to have public interest corporations to return an yearly file to report the fulfillment of the integrity requirements given in return for the increase of the business holding ratio.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신성임 ; 윤재원, "기업집단 주식을 보유한 공익법인의 재무성과에 관한 연구" 아시아.유럽미래학회 12 (12): 63-83, 2015

      2 국회입법조사처, "기부금품 모집 사용제도 현황과 개선방향" 2020

      3 박훈, "공익활동 활성화를 위한 공익법인 과세제도의 개선방안" 한국조세연구포럼 19 (19): 55-80, 2019

      4 손원익, "공익법인의 운영실태 분석 및 정책방향 - 성실공익법인으로 중심으로 -" 세법연구센터, 한국조세연구원 2012

      5 이상신, "공익법인에 대한 주식 출연의 제한 및그 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 21 (21): 193-225, 2015

      6 김지혜, "공익법인 주식보유가 재벌계열사의 소유지배괴리도와 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 부산대학교 대학원 2021

      7 "https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/Tax/us-private-foundations-brochure.pdf"

      8 "https://www.nonprofitexpert.com/nonprofit-irs-topic-index/private-foundation-excisetaxes/"

      9 "https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/private-foundations/charitable-trusts-thatsupport-public-charities"

      10 "https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/forms-publications/publications/t2082/excess-corporate-holdings-regime-private-foundations.html"

      1 신성임 ; 윤재원, "기업집단 주식을 보유한 공익법인의 재무성과에 관한 연구" 아시아.유럽미래학회 12 (12): 63-83, 2015

      2 국회입법조사처, "기부금품 모집 사용제도 현황과 개선방향" 2020

      3 박훈, "공익활동 활성화를 위한 공익법인 과세제도의 개선방안" 한국조세연구포럼 19 (19): 55-80, 2019

      4 손원익, "공익법인의 운영실태 분석 및 정책방향 - 성실공익법인으로 중심으로 -" 세법연구센터, 한국조세연구원 2012

      5 이상신, "공익법인에 대한 주식 출연의 제한 및그 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 21 (21): 193-225, 2015

      6 김지혜, "공익법인 주식보유가 재벌계열사의 소유지배괴리도와 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 부산대학교 대학원 2021

      7 "https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/Tax/us-private-foundations-brochure.pdf"

      8 "https://www.nonprofitexpert.com/nonprofit-irs-topic-index/private-foundation-excisetaxes/"

      9 "https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/private-foundations/charitable-trusts-thatsupport-public-charities"

      10 "https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/forms-publications/publications/t2082/excess-corporate-holdings-regime-private-foundations.html"

      11 "https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/cra-arc/formspubs/pub/t2082/t2082-10e.pdf"

      12 "https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/Swaminomics/charitable-trusts-must-notexert-corporate-control/"

      13 "https://pfc.ca/about/"

      14 Committee on Finance United States Senate, "Treasury Department Report on Private Foundations"

      15 Stuart G. Lazar, "The Definition of Voting Stock and the Computation of Voting Power Under Sections 368(c) and 1504(a):Recent Developments and Tax Lore"

      16 OECD, "Taxation and Philanthropy"

      17 Richard Schmalbeck, "Reconsidering Private Foundation Investment Limitations" 58 : 2004

      18 Deloitte, "Private foundations Establishing a vehicle for your charitable vision"

      19 Maria Elena Hoffstein, "PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS" 2007

      20 Charities Aid Foundation, "GROSS DOMESTIC PHILANTHROPY:An international analysis of GDP, tax and giving"

      21 Dana Brakman Reiser, "FOUNDATION REGULATION IN OUR AGE OF IMPACT" 17 : 2020

      22 Donors and Foundations Networks in Europe AISBL (Dafne) and European Foundation Centre, "Comparative Highlights of Foundation Laws The Operating Environment for Foundations in Europe"

      23 Canada Revenue Agency, "Capital Gains"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-17 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국세법연구회 -> 한국세법학회 KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 0.89
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.75 1.048 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼