RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      주민참여의 효과성 개선을 위한 도시재생 프로세스에 관한연구 = A Study on the Urban Regeneration Process for Improving the Effectiveness of Residents' Participation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108248790

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      (Background and Purpose) Urban regeneration in various countries in recent times has emphasized the importance of residents’ participation and collaborative governance. Instead of being a public utility unilaterally led by the government, urban regeneration is a business that is jointly promoted by the central and local government departments, residents, social organizations, enterprises, and many other stakeholders. Although the importance of residents' participation has been recognized by countries around the world, it is a permitted behavior within limits instead of being a right of residents in the past power-oriented government structures. Moreover, the relationship between managers and residents is antagonistic. As a result, it is still insufficient in terms of the effect of residents' participation in urban regeneration. In this context, this study aims at analyzing the process of urban regeneration cases and putting forward the improvement directions for the effectiveness of residents' participation. (Method) First, the nature of the participants in the regeneration business and the definition of collaborative governance are investigated through theoretical investigation. Further, previous research on collaborative governance and the effectiveness of residents' participation are taken as the basis, in which the effectiveness of residents' participation is divided into the degree of residents' participation and the environment of residents' participation. Second, the ladder theory of residents' participation and the factors that affect residents' participation are examined and analyzed using the previous research, and the framework of case analysis is completed. Third, the framework of case analysis is used to compare and analyze cases. (Results) Based on the results of the comparison and analysis of three cases, it can be understood that residents can participate in all stages of the procedure in terms of the degree of residents' participation, but only British residents can designate the project implementation site. Moreover, the collaborative governance of diverse subjects, local decentralization, and residents' autonomy play a significant role in residents' participation in the environment. (Conclusions) The highest effectiveness of British residents' participation is embodied among the three countries. However, the effectiveness of participation in Germany and China is not higher than that in the UK because of the low public awareness of residents. To perfect the effectiveness of residents' participation, an improvement in the degree of residents' participation and the environment for residents' participation is necessary. To perfect the degree of residents' participation, the design of procedures and various ways of participation that residents can take part in at all stages is necessary. In addition, the formation of a cooperative governance situation for diversified subjects is necessary to perfect this.
      번역하기

      (Background and Purpose) Urban regeneration in various countries in recent times has emphasized the importance of residents’ participation and collaborative governance. Instead of being a public utility unilaterally led by the government, urban rege...

      (Background and Purpose) Urban regeneration in various countries in recent times has emphasized the importance of residents’ participation and collaborative governance. Instead of being a public utility unilaterally led by the government, urban regeneration is a business that is jointly promoted by the central and local government departments, residents, social organizations, enterprises, and many other stakeholders. Although the importance of residents' participation has been recognized by countries around the world, it is a permitted behavior within limits instead of being a right of residents in the past power-oriented government structures. Moreover, the relationship between managers and residents is antagonistic. As a result, it is still insufficient in terms of the effect of residents' participation in urban regeneration. In this context, this study aims at analyzing the process of urban regeneration cases and putting forward the improvement directions for the effectiveness of residents' participation. (Method) First, the nature of the participants in the regeneration business and the definition of collaborative governance are investigated through theoretical investigation. Further, previous research on collaborative governance and the effectiveness of residents' participation are taken as the basis, in which the effectiveness of residents' participation is divided into the degree of residents' participation and the environment of residents' participation. Second, the ladder theory of residents' participation and the factors that affect residents' participation are examined and analyzed using the previous research, and the framework of case analysis is completed. Third, the framework of case analysis is used to compare and analyze cases. (Results) Based on the results of the comparison and analysis of three cases, it can be understood that residents can participate in all stages of the procedure in terms of the degree of residents' participation, but only British residents can designate the project implementation site. Moreover, the collaborative governance of diverse subjects, local decentralization, and residents' autonomy play a significant role in residents' participation in the environment. (Conclusions) The highest effectiveness of British residents' participation is embodied among the three countries. However, the effectiveness of participation in Germany and China is not higher than that in the UK because of the low public awareness of residents. To perfect the effectiveness of residents' participation, an improvement in the degree of residents' participation and the environment for residents' participation is necessary. To perfect the degree of residents' participation, the design of procedures and various ways of participation that residents can take part in at all stages is necessary. In addition, the formation of a cooperative governance situation for diversified subjects is necessary to perfect this.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이명석, "협력적 거버넌스와 공공성" 한국국정관리학회 20 (20): 23-53, 2010

      2 김이수, "정보화마을정책에서 주민참여의 효과성 연구 - 전라북도 정보화마을을 중심으로 -" 한국자치행정학회 28 (28): 85-107, 2014

      3 유수동 ; 전성훈, "재난관리정책에 대한 집행요인과 협력적 거버넌스에 관한 연구: 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국거버넌스학회 23 (23): 87-115, 2016

      4 정현 ; 정문기, "사회적 자본이 주민참여에 미치는 영향: 서울특별시 금천구 독산2・3동을 중심으로" 한국지방행정연구원 33 (33): 3-36, 2019

      5 박서연 ; 전희정, "사회자본과 정책인지도가 주민참여 의사에 미치는 영향 - 서울시 ‘찾아가는 동주민센터’ 사업을 중심으로 -" 한국정책학회 28 (28): 195-222, 2019

      6 이나경, "도시재생 사업의 주민참여 현황과 문제점 탐색: 창신・숭인 도시재생선도사업을 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 59 (59): 163-194, 2021

      7 Wang, Xiaozhang, "The willingness of urban residents to participate in the community—An analysis of a questionnaire survey in H city" 2004 (2004): 99-105, 2004

      8 Qi, Shuang, "The research on british urbanization" Jilin University Graduate School 2014

      9 He, Yuling, "Study on urban community participation and influencing factors—A case study of DY community in Chengdu" Southwest Minzu University 2018

      10 Yang, Mengyu, "Study on the influence factors of public participation in environmental policy making—Based on empirical analysis of Beijing" 27 (27): 1-13, 2015

      1 이명석, "협력적 거버넌스와 공공성" 한국국정관리학회 20 (20): 23-53, 2010

      2 김이수, "정보화마을정책에서 주민참여의 효과성 연구 - 전라북도 정보화마을을 중심으로 -" 한국자치행정학회 28 (28): 85-107, 2014

      3 유수동 ; 전성훈, "재난관리정책에 대한 집행요인과 협력적 거버넌스에 관한 연구: 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국거버넌스학회 23 (23): 87-115, 2016

      4 정현 ; 정문기, "사회적 자본이 주민참여에 미치는 영향: 서울특별시 금천구 독산2・3동을 중심으로" 한국지방행정연구원 33 (33): 3-36, 2019

      5 박서연 ; 전희정, "사회자본과 정책인지도가 주민참여 의사에 미치는 영향 - 서울시 ‘찾아가는 동주민센터’ 사업을 중심으로 -" 한국정책학회 28 (28): 195-222, 2019

      6 이나경, "도시재생 사업의 주민참여 현황과 문제점 탐색: 창신・숭인 도시재생선도사업을 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 59 (59): 163-194, 2021

      7 Wang, Xiaozhang, "The willingness of urban residents to participate in the community—An analysis of a questionnaire survey in H city" 2004 (2004): 99-105, 2004

      8 Qi, Shuang, "The research on british urbanization" Jilin University Graduate School 2014

      9 He, Yuling, "Study on urban community participation and influencing factors—A case study of DY community in Chengdu" Southwest Minzu University 2018

      10 Yang, Mengyu, "Study on the influence factors of public participation in environmental policy making—Based on empirical analysis of Beijing" 27 (27): 1-13, 2015

      11 Liu, Weizhong, "Study on local govermant's collaborative governance in china" Shandong University 2012

      12 Zhou, Xiankun, "Research on the planning institution of urban redevelopment district" Tsinghua University Graduate School 2017

      13 Pan, Le, "Research on the effectiveness of public participation in local government performance evaluation based on ahp method—taking the 'three people's activities' in qingdao as an example" Qingdao University 2019

      14 Gu, Tiantian, "Research on residents' engagement in governance of sponge-style old community renewal: taking sponge cities in yangtze river delta as an example" Southeast University 2019

      15 Li, Shirong, "Research on influencing factors of urban residents' individual intention to participate in community governance" Yunnan University 2018

      16 Qu, Lingyan, "Renewal, regeneration and renaissance : urban policies of britain since the 1960s" 26 (26): 59-65, 2011

      17 Innes, J. E., "Reframing public participation : strategies for the 21st century" 5 (5): 419-436, 2004

      18 Donahue, J. D., "Public-private collaboration" 18 (18): 496-525, 2006

      19 Rowe, G., "Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation" 25 (25): 3-29, 2000

      20 Tian, Wendi, "Public participation in urban planning: logic, experience and path optimization-from the perspective of social governance modernization" 2019 (2019): 112-117, 2019

      21 Mannarini, T., "Public involvement : How to encourage citizen participation" 20 (20): 262-274, 2010

      22 Wang, Yanli, "On the synergy governance dynamic mechanism of urban community" Jilin University 2012

      23 Chi, K. S., "Four strategies to transform state governance" IBM Center for The Business of Government 2008

      24 Ansell, C., "Collaborative governance in theory and practice" 18 (18): 543-571, 2008

      25 Tian, Peijie, "Collaborative governance : theoretical framework and model" Shanghai JiaoTong University 2014

      26 Schmidthuber, L., "Citizen participation in public administration : investigating open government for social innovation" 49 (49): 343-355, 2019

      27 Emerson, K., "An integrative framework for collaborative governance" 22 (22): 1-29, 2012

      28 Arnstein, S. R., "A ladder of citizen participation" 35 (35): 216-224, 1969

      29 Cho, Eunyoung, "A Study on Developing Collaborative Governance system through Intermediate Organization: Focused on YongChon Market in SeodaemunGu" 4 (4): 109-135, 2018

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-06-01 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Intitute of the spatial design -> Journal of Korea Intitute of Spatial Design KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.47 0.47 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.51 0.52 0.692 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼