RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Economic Effectiveness of Public R&D Investment in Environmental Technologies: The Case of Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60305259

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      public environmental R&D investment; total factor productivity (TFP); economies of scale; factor substitutability Korean government has invested huge amounts of public money (approximately 871 billion wons from 2001 to 2010) in environment R&D projects. However, research has not been systematically conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of public environmental R&D investment. Thus this paper tries to evaluate the effectiveness and productivity of public environmental R&D investment, using a hybrid translog cost function approach. In doing that, it employs total factor productivity (TFP), supply elasticity of cost and economies of scale, price elasticity of input demand, and Morishima elasticity of substitution. It also analyzes differences in TFP, economies of scale, and factor substitutability across environmental project research areas and across R&D research launching agents. Empirical findings indicate that (1) environmental projects failed to achieve efficiency and productivity gains, and (2) when accounting for both measures of outputs (i.e., number of peer-reviewed articles, and number of patents obtained), the size and magnitude of an environmental project need to be expanded to save average costs and improve efficiency. In addition, this paper found large variations in productivity gains, supply elasticity of cost and economies of scale, own- or cross-price elasticity of input demand, and Morishima elasticity of substitution across environmental project research areas and across R&D research launching agents.
      번역하기

      public environmental R&D investment; total factor productivity (TFP); economies of scale; factor substitutability Korean government has invested huge amounts of public money (approximately 871 billion wons from 2001 to 2010) in environment R&D project...

      public environmental R&D investment; total factor productivity (TFP); economies of scale; factor substitutability Korean government has invested huge amounts of public money (approximately 871 billion wons from 2001 to 2010) in environment R&D projects. However, research has not been systematically conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of public environmental R&D investment. Thus this paper tries to evaluate the effectiveness and productivity of public environmental R&D investment, using a hybrid translog cost function approach. In doing that, it employs total factor productivity (TFP), supply elasticity of cost and economies of scale, price elasticity of input demand, and Morishima elasticity of substitution. It also analyzes differences in TFP, economies of scale, and factor substitutability across environmental project research areas and across R&D research launching agents. Empirical findings indicate that (1) environmental projects failed to achieve efficiency and productivity gains, and (2) when accounting for both measures of outputs (i.e., number of peer-reviewed articles, and number of patents obtained), the size and magnitude of an environmental project need to be expanded to save average costs and improve efficiency. In addition, this paper found large variations in productivity gains, supply elasticity of cost and economies of scale, own- or cross-price elasticity of input demand, and Morishima elasticity of substitution across environmental project research areas and across R&D research launching agents.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼