Disagreement for Politeness in Speech Act of Korean EFL Learners

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine the speech act by a group of Korean EFL students at university level. In order to determine why and to what extent the production of speech act of disagreement and the patterns of politeness strategies by Korean EFL learners, in university setting, across different proficiency levels (intermediate and lower) a Discourse Completion Test (DCT) was completed by 20 Korean EFL learners who were placed at two different levels based on their scores on a TOEIC test. The DCT consists of five situations in which the subjects are expected to disagree. The selection of disagreement situations in DCT was borrowed from studies by Takahashi and Beebe (1993). The taxonomy from Muntigl and Turnbull (1998) was employed for counting and analyzing the utterances of disagreement from the responses. Results show that the lower proficiency of Korean EFL learners employ more direct way of disagreement than their immediate level of Korean EFL learners. The findings of this study provide some evidences for the relation between the learners’ level of language proficiency and frequency of disagreement.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Muntigl, P., "The conversational structure and face implications of everyday arguing" Simon Fraser University 1995

2 Brown, P, "Some universals in language usage" Cambridge University Press 1987

3 Locher, M. A., "Power and politeness in action, In Disagreements in oral communication" Mouton de Gruyter 2004

4 Bell, N., "Politeness in the speech of Korean ESL learners" 14 (14): 25-47, 1998

5 Kreutel, K, "I’m not agree with you. ESL learners’ expression of disagreement" 11 (11): 2007

6 Brown, P., "How and why are women more polite: some evidence from a Mayan community, In Language and Gende: A Reader" Oxford 81-99, 1998

7 Hwang, J. R., "Deference versus politeness in Korean speech" 82 : 41-55, 1990

8 Takahashi, T., "Cross-linguistic influence in the speech act of correction, In Interlanguage Pragmatics" Oxford University Press 138-157, 1993

9 Muntigl, P., "Conversational structure and facework in arguing" 29 : 225-256, 1998

10 Behnam, B., "An investigation of Iranian EFL learners’ use of politeness strategies and power relations in disagreement across different proficiency" 4 (4): 204-220, 2011

11 Song, K. S, "An international sociolinguistic analysis of argument strategies in Korean conversational discourse: Negotiating disagreement and conflict" 54 : 4078-, 1994

12 Lee, E. S., "A study on the Korean-English honorific system in cultural differences" 13 : 127-154, 2008