A Critical Look at the Multimodal Pragmatic Approach to Translation

국문 초록 (Abstract)

번역은 일종의 다중기호체계를 이용한 의사소통이다. 다중기호체계는 번역과정과 번역텍스트에서 점점 더 중요하게 고려되고 있다. 번역 영역에서 다중기호 텍스트의 등장과 더불어, Dicerto (2018)는 다중기호 원본텍스트 (source text) 분석을 위한 다중기호적 화용분석 모델을 제시했다. 다중기호체계 연구(multimodal studies)와 번역연구 분야에 화용 이론을 응용함으로써 언어적, 비언어적 다중기호(언어, 음향, 시각 기호)들의 해석을 보편적 원리로 설명하려 하였다. 이 다중기호적 화용분석 모델은 다학문적 연구가 가지는 장점을 통해 번역 분석을 이론적으로, 체계적으로 설명할 수 있는 모델이다. 본 연구에서는 Dicerto의 모델이 가지는 장단점을 실제 텍스트, 즉 정적 다중기호 텍스트 (static multimodal text) 뿐만 아니라, 동적 다중기호 텍스트 (dynamic multimodal text)에도 적용해 봄으로써 그 적용가능성을 살펴본 후, 그 번역모델의 한계점과 문제를 적시하고, 이를 해결하기 위한 모델의 확장 필요성과 가능성을 논의한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Translation is a kind of multimodal communication. Its multimodality is getting more significant in the translation process and translation texts. With the rise of multimodal texts in translation landscape, Dicerto (2018) proposes a multimodal pragmatic (MP) model for the analysis of multimodal source texts in translation. However, a critical look at her MP model shows that, for all of its multi-disciplinary advantages, it limits its theoretical applications to only target texts, and static multimodal texts; it does not pay attentions on various relations between source and target texts, and dynamic multimodal texts. In line with such limitations, we apply the model to a dynamic pragmatic example, and suggest some modifications to get over such limitations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문초록
• 1. Introduction
• 2. Multimodal Pragmatic Model for Text Analysis
• 3. Multidisciplinary Advantages
• 4. Limitations and Problems
• 5. Model Application to a Dynamic Multimodal Text
• 6. Conclusion
• References
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Forceville, Charles, "Visual Communication" Mouton de Gruyter 81-104, 2014

2 Gutt, E. A., "Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context" St. Jerome 2000

3 Mubenga, K. S., "Towards a Multimodal Pragmatic Analysis of Film Discourse in Audiovisual Translation" 54 (54): 466-484, 2009

4 Braun, S., "The Importance of Being Relevant? A Cognitive-Pragmatic Framework for Conceptualising Audiovisual Translation" 28 (28): 302-313, 2016

5 Taylor, C. J., "The Handbook of Translation Studies volume 4" John Benjamins Publishing Company 98-104, 2013

6 Van Leeuwen, "The Handbook of Discourse Analysis" John Wiley & Sons Inc. 447-466, 2015

7 Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Act" Academic Press 41-58, 1975

8 Grice, H. P., "Studies in the Way of Words" Harvard University Press 1989

9 Sperber, D., "Relevance : Communication and Cognition" Blackwell 1995

10 Reiss, K., "Readings in Translation Theory" Oy Finn Lectura Ab 105-115, 1989

11 Kress, G., "Reading Images : The Grammar of Visual Design" Routledge 1996

12 Taylor, C. J., "Perspectives on Multimodality" John Benjamins 153-172, 2004

13 Taylor, C. J., "Multimodal Transcription in the Analysis, Translation and Subtitling of Italian Films" 9 (9): 191-205, 2003

14 Baldry, A. P., "Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis" Equinox 2005

15 O'Halloran, K. L., "Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains" Routledge 2011

16 Dicerto, Sara, "Multimodal Pragmatics and Translation: A New Model for Source Text Analysis" Palgrave Macmillan 2018

17 Kress, G., "Multimodal Discourse : The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication" Hodder Arnold 2001

18 Machin, D., "Introduction to Multimodal Analysis" Oxford University Press 2007

19 Barthes, R., "Image–Music–Text" Fontana 32-51, 1977

20 Huang, Lihe, "Establishing Multimodal Rhetoric : Also on the Link between Rhetoric and Pagmatics" 20 (20): 117-132, 2018

21 Pastra, K., "COSMOROE : A Cross-Media Relations Framework for Modelling Multimedia Dialectics" 14 : 299-323, 2008

22 Díaz-Cintas, J., "Audiovisual translation : subtitling" St. Jerome 2007

23 Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" Edward Arnold 1994

24 Martinec, R., "A System for Image-text Relations in New(and Old)Media" 4 (4): 337-371, 2005