백스쿼트와 프런트스쿼트의 동작 차이 비교 = The difference of motion between Back and Front Squats

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the change in motion and the load distribution between the front and back squat. With these purposes in consideration, 7 experienced weight lifters peformed both front and back squat. In order to analyze the change in motion and the load distribution of the two types of squat the following variables, ankle joint angle, knee joint angle, body angle, foot pressure, muscle activity using the 3D motion system, foot pressure system and EMG wireless system were compared. Here are the following results. Firtst, for the front squat ankle joint angle at event 2 was smaller but knee joint angle was between the two types of squat there was no significant difference. Second, foot pressure for all phases was no significant difference. Third, all of the phases the Upper muscle EMG values were higher while preforming the front squat. All things considered, the change in motion and the load distribution are different depending on the squat type. It is concluded that the front squat is effective exercise for developing overall muscles and the back squat is go여 for developing the quadriceps strengthening and the stability of upper body.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 연구방법
• Ⅲ. 결과
• Ⅳ. 논의
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임완기, "체력육성을 위한 퍼펙트 웨이트트레이닝" 도서출판 홍경 2006

2 문영진, "역도 인상동작의 운동학적 분석" 한국운동역학회 14 (14): 41-55, 2004

3 문영진, "역도 인상 동작 수행시 인체 관절에서발생하는 모멘트의 산출" 5 (5): 3-18, 1995

4 O'Shea, P., "The paralled squat" 7 : 4-6, 1985

5 Zink, A. J., "The effects of a weight belt on trunk and leg muscle activity and joint kinematics during the squat exercise" 15 (15): 235-240, 2001

6 Launder, J. E., "The effectiveness of weight-belts during the squat exercise" 22 (22): 117-126, 1990

7 Donnelly, D. V., "The effect of the dorection of gaze on the kinematics of the squat exercise" 20 (20): 145-150, 2006

8 Caterisano, A., "The effect of back squat depth on the EMG activity of 4 superficial hip and thigh muscles" 16 (16): 428-432, 2002

9 McCaw, S. T., "Stance width and bar load effects on leg muscle activity during the parallel squat" 31 (31): 428-436, 1999

10 Bompa, T.O., "Periodization" 2009

11 Cappozzo, A., "Lumbar spine loading during half-squat exercises" 17 : 613-620, 1985

12 Escamilla, R. F., "Effects of technique on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press" 33 (33): 1552-1566, 2001

13 Fry, A. C., "Effect of knee position on hip and knee torques during the barbell squat" 17 (17): 629-633, 2003

14 Stuart, M. j., "Comparison of intersegmental tibiofemoral joint forces and muscle activity during various closed kinetic chain exercises" 24 : 792-799, 1996

15 Fry, A. C., "Coaching considerations for the barbell squat-Part1" 15 (15): 556-569, 1993

16 Launder, J. E., "Biomechanics of the squat exercise using a modified center of mass bar" 18 : 469-478, 1986

17 Escamilla, R. F., "Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercise" 30 (30): 556-569, 1998

18 Williams, J. G., "Biomechanical factors in spinal injuries" 14 : 14-17, 1980

19 N. Ganter, "Applicability of a Full Body Inertial Measurement System for Kinematic Analysis of the Discus Throw" 2010

20 McLaughlin, T. M., "Akinematic model of performance in the parallel squat by champion power-lifters" 9 (9): 128-133, 1977

21 Russell, P. J., "A preliminary comparison of front and back squat exercise" 60 (60): 201-208, 1989

22 Goldberg, L., "A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of running and weight training" 20 : 219-224, 1996

23 Jonathan, C. G., "A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained individuals" 23 (23): 284-292, 2009

24 통계청, "2006년도 국민생활체육활동 참여 실태조사" 2007