私法原則在民初平政院行政訴訟實踐中的適用 - 以《平政院裁決錄存》為中心的考察 - = The Application of the Principle of Private Law in the Practice of Administrative Trial of Ping Zheng Yuan in the Early Period of the Republic of China - Focusing on the Ping Zheng Yuan's Judgments Collection -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The distinction between public and private laws is relatively clear, but there is also a certain possibility of mutual penetration. The principles of modern private law were shaped by The Civil Law Draft compiled from the late Qing Dynasty to the early Republic of China. Meanwhile, the principles were mainly embodied in the principles of holiness of private-right, the principle of honesty and credibility, fault liability principle, the principle of public order and good customs, the principle of autonomy of will, the principle of contractual freedom and the prohibition of abuse of rights. In terms of the practice of modern administrative trial, the principles of private law invoked by the rulings of the Ping Zheng Yuan are mainly reflected in the principle of honesty and credibility, the principle of public order and good customs, and the principle of autonomy of will. According to the practice of administrative litigation in modern Ping Zheng Yuan, the principle of private law can be effectively applied to the field of administrative trial.
This possibility depends on that the principle of private law has certain commonality with administrative trial in terms of institutional purpose and applicable content. In the specific application manners, the application logic of adjudication is mainly manifested in the common-sense deduction and principle deduction. Moreover, the application and limitation of these private law principles are affected by the philosophy of natural law and the social-based legislative view in the legal basis of its trial. The enlightenment is that the important function of private law principle to mediate specific disputes under the view of the principle of unity of legal order should be made full use of to provide important legal application resources for the purpose of realizing the right relief in the field of administrative law and stabilizing social order.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

公私法畛域较为分明，但彼此相互渗透亦存在一定的可能. 近代私法原 则受到清末以至民初编纂的民法草案的形塑，并集中体现为私权神圣、 诚实信用、过错责任、公序良俗、意思自治、契约自由与禁止权利滥用 等原则. 而就近代行政诉讼实践而言，平政院裁决所援引的私法原则主要 体现为诚实信用、公序良俗与意思自治原则. 揆诸近代平政院行政诉讼实 践，私法原则能够有效适用于行政诉讼领域. 这种可能性仰赖于私法原则 在制度目的、适用内容上与行政诉讼具有一定的共通性. 察其具体适用方 式，裁决适用逻辑主要表现为常识演绎方式与原理演绎方式；考其裁决 法理基础，这些私法原则的适用及其限制受到自然法哲学与社会本位立 法观的影响. 其启示在于，要在法秩序统一原理的观照下，充分利用私法 原则调解特定纠纷的重要功能，为实现行政法领域的权利救济、稳定社 会秩序之目的提供重要的法律适用资源.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 韓冰, "論近代中國民法變遷中的所有權絕對原則" (1) : 2011

2 王軼, "論民法諸項基本原則及其關係" (3) : 2013

3 張晉藩, "論中國古代民法——以清代民法為視角" (5) : 2020

4 張淑芳, "私法滲入公法的必然與邊界" (4) : 2019

5 戴永盛, "瑞士民法典" 中國政法大學出版社 2016

6 牟奕霖, "民法典中的公權力規範及與私權利的關係" (2) : 2022

7 張生, "民國初期民法的近代化——以固有法與繼受法的整合為中心" 中國政法大學出版社 2001

8 黃源盛, "民初大理院與裁判" 元照出版有限公司 2011

9 劉士國, "日本民法典 : 2017年大修改" 中國法制出版社 2018

10 拿破崙, "拿破崙法典：法國民法典" 商務印書館 2009

11 臺灣大學法律學院, "德國民法典" 北京大學出版社 2017

12 黃源盛, "平政院裁決錄存" 臺北五南圖書出版公司 2007

13 戴永盛, "奧地利普通民法典" 中國政法大學出版社 2016

14 楊立新, "大清民律草案·民國民律草案" 吉林人民出版社 2002

15 章劍生, "作為介入和擴展私法自治領域的行政法" (3) : 2021

16 蘇豔英, "中華傳統文化與現代民法文化的整合——民法典的法文化解讀" (6) : 2020

17 張生, "中國近代民法法典化研究 : 1901-1949" 中國政法大學出版社 2004

18 朱勇, "中國民法近代化研究" 中國政法大學出版社 2006

19 陳榮文, "《民法典》‘私法自治’的理念衍義與制度構建" (9) : 2020

20 孟祥沛, "《大清民律草案》法源辨析" (4) : 2010