The purpose of this study was to examine legality or illegality about private golf lesson except pro-golfer attached to outdoor golf range. First, private golf lesson without pay is legal. Because justification and foundation of legal sanctions and pr...
The purpose of this study was to examine legality or illegality about private golf lesson except pro-golfer attached to outdoor golf range. First, private golf lesson without pay is legal. Because justification and foundation of legal sanctions and prohibition about private golf lesson of purpose for nonprofit is nothing. Second, private golf lesson as criminal law aspect is not illegal. It is legal. Because private golf lesson is not applicable to crime of interference with a outdoor golf driving range`s duties. Third, the regulation of private golf lesson prohibition as civil law aspect is not legal. It is illegal. Because it is applicable to unfair agreement by the Agreement Regulation Law and it is applicable to action of monopolization and abuse outdoor golf driving range`s official authority about golf lesson by the Monopoly Regulations and Fair Trade Law. Finally, the regulation of private golf lesson prohibition as the constitutional law aspect is unconstitutional. Because it is illegality that it`s act violates and limit educational right and basic right of nation by Article 31 and 37 of the constitution. In conclusion, private golf lesson prohibition is illegal and unlawful act by law, private golf lesson is lawfulness, and it has to become legality in Korean outdoor golf driving range.