RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      황석영 소설에 나타난 디아스포라 = Diaspora appeared in Seokyoung Hwang's Novels

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60055647

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this thesis is to find the aspect of diaspora which is appeared in Seokyoung Hwang's novels, expecially, <Visitor> and <Baridegi>. This thesis points out that the two novels are different from other novels written by Hwang, in order to investigate the difference, it considers the aspect of diasrora appeared in <Visitor> and <Baridegi>. Then, What is diaspore?
      This thesis shows that diaspora is not only in a specific country or ethnic group, but also over the world in 21th century. They are forced to move to other countries without their will. Moreover, diaspora is a negative result of the nco-Iibcralism and the globalism. However, this thesis does not make diaspora identity simply 'the victim of a super suppression', and analyzes what they agonize about concretely, how they think the world and themselves differently, how they react actively.
      Bari, who is the main character in <Baridegi> is a diaspora, a North Korean refugee moving unstabled. On the other hand, Y oseop, who is the main character in <Visitor> apparently looks stable in USA, but at the same time he is a different kind of diaspora being restrained by his memory of Korea war. Bari and Yoseop, both of them try to drag a memory to the present. They critically think that the society easily trow away important memories.
      The one of the main themes of two novels is a dichotomy between good and evil. They criticize not a 'evil', but the belief in 'absolute good'. <Visitor> shows revenges between a christian group and a communist group. This novel points out that the belief in 'absolute good' and revenges ruin the each of human beings. Meanwhile, <Baridegi> shows aspect of a dichotomy between a western world and non western world. but Barry, who is the main character of this novel does not join the way of thinking, and asking for herself. For her, dichotomy just make'> oppressions stronger. She criticizes the dichotomy that globalism is evil and diaspora is good.
      Seokyoung Hwang experiments a way of writing in borrowing Korean Shamanism in <Baridegi>,<Visitor>. The main characters Bari and Yoseop work as a shaman. They are minorities not only in Korea but also the outside of korea, and never accepted in a main world like a shaman in a Korean history. As a minority, they become a subject of healing and communicating as if the shamans unacceptable in a Korea history. In these two novels, Korean shamanism is a opposite to Mass media which has a strong power. While Mass media delete important memories, Shamans try to make it be.
      These two novel are different from other novels written by Seokyoung Hwang that diaspora becomes a subject of healing. In his previous work, the characters shows a contradiction of the world, but not a subject of healing others. but these two novels do not make characters victims in history, do make them a very strong human being to oppose that history.
      번역하기

      The aim of this thesis is to find the aspect of diaspora which is appeared in Seokyoung Hwang's novels, expecially, <Visitor> and <Baridegi>. This thesis points out that the two novels are different from other novels written by Hwang, in o...

      The aim of this thesis is to find the aspect of diaspora which is appeared in Seokyoung Hwang's novels, expecially, <Visitor> and <Baridegi>. This thesis points out that the two novels are different from other novels written by Hwang, in order to investigate the difference, it considers the aspect of diasrora appeared in <Visitor> and <Baridegi>. Then, What is diaspore?
      This thesis shows that diaspora is not only in a specific country or ethnic group, but also over the world in 21th century. They are forced to move to other countries without their will. Moreover, diaspora is a negative result of the nco-Iibcralism and the globalism. However, this thesis does not make diaspora identity simply 'the victim of a super suppression', and analyzes what they agonize about concretely, how they think the world and themselves differently, how they react actively.
      Bari, who is the main character in <Baridegi> is a diaspora, a North Korean refugee moving unstabled. On the other hand, Y oseop, who is the main character in <Visitor> apparently looks stable in USA, but at the same time he is a different kind of diaspora being restrained by his memory of Korea war. Bari and Yoseop, both of them try to drag a memory to the present. They critically think that the society easily trow away important memories.
      The one of the main themes of two novels is a dichotomy between good and evil. They criticize not a 'evil', but the belief in 'absolute good'. <Visitor> shows revenges between a christian group and a communist group. This novel points out that the belief in 'absolute good' and revenges ruin the each of human beings. Meanwhile, <Baridegi> shows aspect of a dichotomy between a western world and non western world. but Barry, who is the main character of this novel does not join the way of thinking, and asking for herself. For her, dichotomy just make'> oppressions stronger. She criticizes the dichotomy that globalism is evil and diaspora is good.
      Seokyoung Hwang experiments a way of writing in borrowing Korean Shamanism in <Baridegi>,<Visitor>. The main characters Bari and Yoseop work as a shaman. They are minorities not only in Korea but also the outside of korea, and never accepted in a main world like a shaman in a Korean history. As a minority, they become a subject of healing and communicating as if the shamans unacceptable in a Korea history. In these two novels, Korean shamanism is a opposite to Mass media which has a strong power. While Mass media delete important memories, Shamans try to make it be.
      These two novel are different from other novels written by Seokyoung Hwang that diaspora becomes a subject of healing. In his previous work, the characters shows a contradiction of the world, but not a subject of healing others. but these two novels do not make characters victims in history, do make them a very strong human being to oppose that history.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 불안정한 이동과 내적 분열
      • 3. 망각에 대한 저항과 능동적 기억
      • 4. 이방인의 시선과 이분법 해체
      • 5. 소통과 치유로서의 말하기
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 불안정한 이동과 내적 분열
      • 3. 망각에 대한 저항과 능동적 기억
      • 4. 이방인의 시선과 이분법 해체
      • 5. 소통과 치유로서의 말하기
      • 6. 결론
      • <참고문헌>
      • [Abstract]
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강용훈, "황석영 소설의 낭만적 성격 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2006

      2 김지운, "황석영 소설의 공간적 배경 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2003

      3 구재진, "한국문학의 탈식민과 디아스포라" 푸른사상사 2011

      4 백지은, "한국 현대소설의 문체 연구 : 김승옥, 이청준, 서정인, 황석영의 글쓰기를 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2006

      5 양진오, "특집1최근 우리 소설의 성과들-한반도의 민족문제에 관한 장기지속적인 성찰-황석영 <손님>" 실천문학사 (67) : 150-162, 2002

      6 오윤호, "탈북 디아스포라의 타자정체성과 자본주의적 생태의 비극성 - 2000년대 탈북 소재 소설 연구" 문학과환경학회 10 (10): 235-258, 2011

      7 정은경, "코리안 디아스포라 문학" 197-198, 2007

      8 강정구, "종교문화적인 갈등으로 바라본 신천학살사건 - 황석영의 장편소설 『손님』론" 외국문학연구소 (42) : 9-32, 2011

      9 정홍섭, "이야기로 풀어낸 역사와 신화화된 이야기-황석영의 <손님>과 이청준의 <신화를 삼킨 섬>" 실천문학사 (71) : 321-332, 2003

      10 이정희, "유령을 재울 것인가 기억에 몸을 입힐 것인가-<손님>의 민중신학적 읽기" 생각의 나무(당대) (17) : 382-392, 2001

      1 강용훈, "황석영 소설의 낭만적 성격 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2006

      2 김지운, "황석영 소설의 공간적 배경 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2003

      3 구재진, "한국문학의 탈식민과 디아스포라" 푸른사상사 2011

      4 백지은, "한국 현대소설의 문체 연구 : 김승옥, 이청준, 서정인, 황석영의 글쓰기를 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2006

      5 양진오, "특집1최근 우리 소설의 성과들-한반도의 민족문제에 관한 장기지속적인 성찰-황석영 <손님>" 실천문학사 (67) : 150-162, 2002

      6 오윤호, "탈북 디아스포라의 타자정체성과 자본주의적 생태의 비극성 - 2000년대 탈북 소재 소설 연구" 문학과환경학회 10 (10): 235-258, 2011

      7 정은경, "코리안 디아스포라 문학" 197-198, 2007

      8 강정구, "종교문화적인 갈등으로 바라본 신천학살사건 - 황석영의 장편소설 『손님』론" 외국문학연구소 (42) : 9-32, 2011

      9 정홍섭, "이야기로 풀어낸 역사와 신화화된 이야기-황석영의 <손님>과 이청준의 <신화를 삼킨 섬>" 실천문학사 (71) : 321-332, 2003

      10 이정희, "유령을 재울 것인가 기억에 몸을 입힐 것인가-<손님>의 민중신학적 읽기" 생각의 나무(당대) (17) : 382-392, 2001

      11 이명원, "약속 없는 시대의 최저낙원-황석영의 바리데기 에 대하여" 문화과학사 (52) : 303-318, 2007

      12 황석영, "손님" 창비 2001

      13 양진오, "세계문학으로서의 한국문학, 그 위상과 전망" 한민족어문학회 (51) : 71-96, 2007

      14 손종업, "바리의 귀환" 실천문학사 (88) : 333-338, 2007

      15 황석영, "바리데기" 창비 2007

      16 윤인진, "디아스포라를 어떻게 볼 것인가" 열림원 (18) : 160-, 2006

      17 서경식, "디아스포라 기행" 돌베개 2006

      18 김재용, "냉전적 분단구조 해체의 소설적 탐구-황석영의 <손님>" (63) : 322-332, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.28
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.3 0.32 0.556 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼