RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      글읽기에서 나타난 성인과 청소년의 중심와주변 정보처리: 고정시간 분포에 대한 확산모형 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107199281

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      이 연구의 목적은 글읽기의 주요한 현상인 중심와주변 미리보기 효과(parafovea preview effect)의 중요성을 검증하고, 성인과 청소년을 대상으로 안구운동추적 실험을 통해 연령이 다른 두 집단의 중심와주변 미리보기 효과를 비교해 보고자 한다. 또한 안구운동 추적실험을 통해 얻은 결과자료를 단일경계 확산모형(diffusion model)의 시작점(starting point) 파라미터로 설명되는지 확인할 것이다. 실험은 경계선 기법(boundary technique)을 이용하여 중심와주변 정보처리를 관찰하였다. 실험 1에서는 중심와주변에 미리보기 정보로 고빈도 단어를 제시하는 것과 미리보기 정보를 차폐하는 것을 비교하였다. 실험 2에서는 중심와주변 미리보기 정보로 저빈도 단어를 제공하였고, 중심와주변 미리보기를 차폐한 것과 비교하였다. 두 실험 결과, 청소년 집단과 성인 집단에서 중심와주변에 정보가 주어졌을 때 중심와주변 미리보기 이득 효과를 확인하였다. 또한 중심와주변에 높인 정보 성질, 즉 단어의 빈도에 따라 두 집단의 첫고정시간, 단일고정시간, 주시시간에서 고정시간 차이를 살펴보았다. 두 실험에서 얻은 첫고정시간 데이터를 분위수로 나누고 단일경계 확산모형에 fitting한 결과, 중심와주변 정보처리가 시작점 파라미터로 설명되는 것을 확인하였다.
      번역하기

      이 연구의 목적은 글읽기의 주요한 현상인 중심와주변 미리보기 효과(parafovea preview effect)의 중요성을 검증하고, 성인과 청소년을 대상으로 안구운동추적 실험을 통해 연령이 다른 두 집단의...

      이 연구의 목적은 글읽기의 주요한 현상인 중심와주변 미리보기 효과(parafovea preview effect)의 중요성을 검증하고, 성인과 청소년을 대상으로 안구운동추적 실험을 통해 연령이 다른 두 집단의 중심와주변 미리보기 효과를 비교해 보고자 한다. 또한 안구운동 추적실험을 통해 얻은 결과자료를 단일경계 확산모형(diffusion model)의 시작점(starting point) 파라미터로 설명되는지 확인할 것이다. 실험은 경계선 기법(boundary technique)을 이용하여 중심와주변 정보처리를 관찰하였다. 실험 1에서는 중심와주변에 미리보기 정보로 고빈도 단어를 제시하는 것과 미리보기 정보를 차폐하는 것을 비교하였다. 실험 2에서는 중심와주변 미리보기 정보로 저빈도 단어를 제공하였고, 중심와주변 미리보기를 차폐한 것과 비교하였다. 두 실험 결과, 청소년 집단과 성인 집단에서 중심와주변에 정보가 주어졌을 때 중심와주변 미리보기 이득 효과를 확인하였다. 또한 중심와주변에 높인 정보 성질, 즉 단어의 빈도에 따라 두 집단의 첫고정시간, 단일고정시간, 주시시간에서 고정시간 차이를 살펴보았다. 두 실험에서 얻은 첫고정시간 데이터를 분위수로 나누고 단일경계 확산모형에 fitting한 결과, 중심와주변 정보처리가 시작점 파라미터로 설명되는 것을 확인하였다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study compares the parafovea preview effect of adolescent group and adult group with different ages using eye tracking experiment. Also, this study confirms that the starting point parameter of the one boundary diffusion model can explain the data obtained through eye tracking experiments. In two experiments, parafoveal information processing was examined using the boundary technique. In Experiment 1, reading times were compared between the conditions given high frequency words preview versus masking preview. In Experiment 2, the condition in which low frequency words were given to parafovea preview information and the condition in which parafovea preview was masked were compared. We found that both the adolescent group and the adult group showed a parafovea preview effect. Also, first fixation, single fixation, and gaze duration of the two groups were different based on the word property shown in the parafovea. The first fixation data obtained in the two experiments were divided into quantiles and fitted into one boundary diffusion model. From the results, we argue that the parafovea preview information processing in the reading was described as the starting point parameter of the one boundary diffusion model.
      번역하기

      This study compares the parafovea preview effect of adolescent group and adult group with different ages using eye tracking experiment. Also, this study confirms that the starting point parameter of the one boundary diffusion model can explain the dat...

      This study compares the parafovea preview effect of adolescent group and adult group with different ages using eye tracking experiment. Also, this study confirms that the starting point parameter of the one boundary diffusion model can explain the data obtained through eye tracking experiments. In two experiments, parafoveal information processing was examined using the boundary technique. In Experiment 1, reading times were compared between the conditions given high frequency words preview versus masking preview. In Experiment 2, the condition in which low frequency words were given to parafovea preview information and the condition in which parafovea preview was masked were compared. We found that both the adolescent group and the adult group showed a parafovea preview effect. Also, first fixation, single fixation, and gaze duration of the two groups were different based on the word property shown in the parafovea. The first fixation data obtained in the two experiments were divided into quantiles and fitted into one boundary diffusion model. From the results, we argue that the parafovea preview information processing in the reading was described as the starting point parameter of the one boundary diffusion model.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서론
      • 글읽기에서의 중심와주변 정보처리
      • 글읽기 연구의 분포 분석의 중요성과 인지모형
      • 연구 목적
      • 실험 1. 고빈도 차폐
      • 서론
      • 글읽기에서의 중심와주변 정보처리
      • 글읽기 연구의 분포 분석의 중요성과 인지모형
      • 연구 목적
      • 실험 1. 고빈도 차폐
      • 실험 2. 저빈도 차폐
      • 종합 논의
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고성룡, "확산모형 분석도구: SNUDM" 한국인지과학회 31 (31): 1-23, 2020

      2 이춘길, "한글을 읽는 시선의 움직임" 서울대학교 출판부 2004

      3 주혜리, "우리글 읽기에서 나타나는 고정시간 분포에 대한 확산모형 분석" 서울대학교 2015

      4 고성룡, "우리글 명사 어절에서의 단어 빈도 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구" 한국인지및생물심리학회 20 (20): 21-37, 2008

      5 민철홍, "우리 글을 읽을 때 음운 정보의 효과 탐색 : 음절 및 음절의 부분을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

      6 고성룡, "어린이 글 읽기에서 나타나는 안구 운동의 특징" 한국인지과학회 21 (21): 481-503, 2010

      7 최소영, "안구운동추적기법을 활용한 읽기장애 연구의 도입과 전망: 국내 연구 현황을 중심으로" 한국학습장애학회 9 (9): 121-136, 2012

      8 코마츠 요시타카, "시선 추적을 통한 일본어 읽기에서 보이는 중심와주변의 의미처리 연구" 서울대학교 2017

      9 Bates, D., "nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3"

      10 Long, D. L., "ndividual differences in the time course of inferential processing" 20 : 1456-1470, 1994

      1 고성룡, "확산모형 분석도구: SNUDM" 한국인지과학회 31 (31): 1-23, 2020

      2 이춘길, "한글을 읽는 시선의 움직임" 서울대학교 출판부 2004

      3 주혜리, "우리글 읽기에서 나타나는 고정시간 분포에 대한 확산모형 분석" 서울대학교 2015

      4 고성룡, "우리글 명사 어절에서의 단어 빈도 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구" 한국인지및생물심리학회 20 (20): 21-37, 2008

      5 민철홍, "우리 글을 읽을 때 음운 정보의 효과 탐색 : 음절 및 음절의 부분을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

      6 고성룡, "어린이 글 읽기에서 나타나는 안구 운동의 특징" 한국인지과학회 21 (21): 481-503, 2010

      7 최소영, "안구운동추적기법을 활용한 읽기장애 연구의 도입과 전망: 국내 연구 현황을 중심으로" 한국학습장애학회 9 (9): 121-136, 2012

      8 코마츠 요시타카, "시선 추적을 통한 일본어 읽기에서 보이는 중심와주변의 의미처리 연구" 서울대학교 2017

      9 Bates, D., "nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3"

      10 Long, D. L., "ndividual differences in the time course of inferential processing" 20 : 1456-1470, 1994

      11 Balota, D. A., "Word-frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency" 128 : 32-55, 1999

      12 Koh, S., "Word Frequency and Root-Morpheme Frequency Effects on Processing of Korean Particle-Suffixed Words" 25 (25): 64-67, 2012

      13 Rayner, K., "What guides a reader's eye movements?" 16 : 829-837, 1976

      14 Jones, M., "Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time" 121 (121): 1-32, 2014

      15 Lovett, Maureen W., "Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children: Treatment and transfer effects" 82 (82): 769-780, 1990

      16 Kliegl, R., "Tracking the mind during reading : The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations" 135 : 13-35, 2006

      17 Reichle, E. D., "Toward a model of eye movement control in reading" 105 : 125-157, 1998

      18 Till, R., "Time Course of Priming for Associate and Inference Words in a Discourse Context" 16 (16): 283-298, 1988

      19 McConkie, G. W., "The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading" 17 : 578-586, 1975

      20 Brown, S. D., "The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation" 57 (57): 153-178, 2008

      21 Juhasz, B. J., "The role of age-of-acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations" 13 : 846-863, 2006

      22 Huey, E. B., "The psychology and pedagogy of reading" Macmillan 1908

      23 Rayner, K., "The effects of word frequency and predictability on eye movements in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model" 30 : 720-732, 2004

      24 Rayner, K., "The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers" 21 : 448-465, 2006

      25 Palmer, J., "The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision" 5 : 376-404, 2005

      26 Staub, A, "The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations" 18 : 371-376, 2011

      27 Ratcliff, R., "The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks" 20 : 873-922, 2008

      28 Kang, B., "The analysis of Korean morphology and word frequency 2" Research Institute of Korea study 2004

      29 Blanchard, H. E., "The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading" 46 : 85-94, 1989

      30 Staub, A., "The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics" Oxford University Press 327-342, 2007

      31 Reichle, E. D., "The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading : Comparison to other models" 26 : 445-476, 2003

      32 Pollatsek, A., "Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control" 52 : 1-52, 2006

      33 Grice, G. R., "Stimulus intensity and response evocation" 75 : 359-373, 1968

      34 Osaka, N., "Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: Psychophysics of Japanese text processing" 9 : 5-13, 1992

      35 Yap, M. J., "Single versus dual process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from RT distributional analysis" 32 : 1324-1344, 2006

      36 Rayner, K., "Selective attentional dyslexia" 6 : 357-378, 1989

      37 Engbert, R., "SWIFT: A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation During Reading" 112 (112): 777-813, 2005

      38 Morrison, C. M., "Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision" 21 (21): 116-133, 1995

      39 Perfetti, C., "Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and interventions" Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc 137-165, 1996

      40 Ratcliff, R., "Putting noise into neurophysiological models of simple decision making" 4 : 336-, 2001

      41 Smith, P. L., "Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions" 27 : 161-168, 2004

      42 Matzke, D., "Psychological interpretation of ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis" 16 : 798-817, 2009

      43 McConkie, G. W., "Processing of visible language" Plenum 37-48, 1979

      44 Kliegl, R., "Preview Benefit and Parafoveal-on-Foveal Effects from Word N+2" 33 (33): 1250-1255, 2007

      45 Klin, C. M., "Prevalence and persistence of predictive inferences" 40 (40): 593-604, 1999

      46 Inhoff, A. W., "Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency" 40 : 431-439, 1986

      47 Usher, M., "On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model" 108 : 550-592, 2001

      48 Uhlenbeck, G. E., "On the theory of brownian motion" 36 : 823-841, 1930

      49 Plourde, C. E., "On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition" 51 : 181-194, 1997

      50 Yap, M. J., "On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses" 34 : 495-513, 2008

      51 Cuetos, F., "Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish" 31 : 650-658, 1999

      52 Snodgrass, J. G., "Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures" 28 : 516-536, 1996

      53 Ratcliff, R., "Modeling simple driving tasks with a one boundary diffusion model" 21 (21): 577-589, 2013

      54 Baayen, R. H., "Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items" 59 : 390-412, 2008

      55 Drieghe, D., "Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading" 61 : 1239-1249, 2008

      56 Stanovich, K. E., "Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of IndividualDifferences in the Acquisition of Literacy" 21 (21): 360-407, 1986

      57 Usher, M., "Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice" 111 : 759-769, 2004

      58 Rayner, K., "Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity" 14 (14): 191-201, 1986

      59 Duffy, S. A., "Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading" 27 (27): 429-446, 1988

      60 Forster, K., "Lexical access and naming time" 12 : 627-635, 1973

      61 Carpenter RHS, "LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading" 177 : 176-183, 2006

      62 Turner, M. L., "Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28" 28 : 127-154, 1989

      63 Juhasz, B. J., "Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading" 29 : 1312-1318, 2003

      64 Traxler, M. J., "Introduction to Psycholinguistics: Understanding Language Science" Wiley Blackwell 2012

      65 Underwood, G., "Information influences the pattern of eye fixations during sentence comprehension" 17 : 267-278, 1988

      66 Daneman, M., "Individual differences in working memory and reading" 19 : 450-466, 1980

      67 Engle, R. W., "Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses" 18 : 972-992, 1992

      68 Daneman, M., "Individual differences in integratinginformation between and within sentences" 9 : 561-584, 1983

      69 Staub, A., "Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading" 20 : 1304-1311, 2013

      70 Grice, G. R., "Human reaction time : Toward a general theory" 111 : 135-153, 1982

      71 Van Zandt, T., "How to fit a response time distribution" 7 : 424-465, 2000

      72 Raaijmakers, J. G. W., "How to deal with “the language-as fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions" 41 (41): 416-426, 1999

      73 Underwood, G., "How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations" 42A : 39-65, 1990

      74 Juel, C., "Handbook of reading research" Longman 759-788, 1991

      75 Balota, D., "Handbook of psycholinguistics" 2006

      76 Pollatsek, A., "Foundations of cognitive science" MIT Press 1989

      77 Brown, G. D. A., "First in, first out : Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency" 15 : 208-216, 1987

      78 Inhoff, A. W., "Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence" 5 : 101-106, 1998

      79 Denbuurman, R., "Eye-Movements and the Perceptual Span in Reading" 16 : 227-235, 1981

      80 O’Regan, J. K., "Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes" Elsevier 395-453, 1990

      81 Chace, K. H., "Eye movements and phonological preview benefit : Effects of reading skill" 59 : 209-217, 2005

      82 Rayner, K., "Eye movements and landing positions in reading: A retrospective" 38 : 895-899, 2009

      83 Reichle, E. D., "Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z reader model" 39 : 4403-4411, 1999

      84 Rayner, K., "Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models" 22 : 1188-1200, 1996

      85 Rayner, K., "Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control" 33A : 351-373, 1981

      86 O'Regan, J. K., "Eye guidance in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis" 25 : 501-509, 1979

      87 Rayner, K., "Eye Movements in reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of research" 124 (124): 372-422, 1998

      88 Gillespie D. T., "Exact numerical simulation of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and its integral" 54 : 2084-, 1996

      89 Brown, S., "Evaluating methods for approximating stochastic differential equations" 50 : 402-410, 2006

      90 McConkie, G. W., "Evaluating and reporting data quality in eye movement research" 13 : 97-106, 1981

      91 Ratcliff, R., "Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to the contaminant reaction times and parameter variability" 9 (9): 438-481, 2002

      92 Reichle, E. D., "E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading" 7 : 4-22, 2006

      93 Staub, A., "Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations" 36 : 1280-1293, 2010

      94 Andrews, S., "Distinguishing common and task specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment?" 27 : 514-544, 2001

      95 Ratcliff, R., "Diffusion and random walk processes. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 6" Elsevier 3668-3673, 2001

      96 Busemeyer, J. R., "Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment" 100 : 432-459, 1993

      97 Henderson, J. M., "Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification" 45 : 196-208, 1989

      98 Carpenter, R. H. S., "Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency : Evidence for independence of detection and decision" 14 : 1576-1580, 2004

      99 Ratcliff, R., "Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information" 95 : 238-255, 1988

      100 Revuz, D., "Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion" Springer-Verlag 1999

      101 Ehrlich, S. F., "Contextual effects on word recognition and eye movements during reading" 20 : 641-655, 1981

      102 Grice, G. R., "Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention" 35 : 451-463, 1984

      103 Balota, D. A., "Beyond response latency: An RT distributional analysis of semantic priming" 59 : 495-523, 2008

      104 Adams, M. J., "Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print" Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc 1990

      105 Monsell, S., "Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition" Erlbaum 148-197, 1991

      106 Balota, D., "Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage" 10 (10): 340-357, 1984

      107 Grice, G. R., "Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial" 12 : 103-107, 1972

      108 Heathcote, A., "Analysis of response time distributions : An example using the Stroop task" 109 : 340-347, 1991

      109 Wagenmakers, E. -J., "An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy" 4 : 3-22, 2007

      110 McKoon, G., "Adults with poor reading skills, older adults, and college students: The meanings they understand during reading using a diffusion model analysis" 102 : 115-129, 2018

      111 Yap, M. J., "Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition" 33 : 274-296, 2007

      112 Ratcliff, R., "A theory of memory retrieval" 85 : 59-108, 1978

      113 Link, S. W., "A sequential theory of psychological discrimination" 40 : 77-105, 1975

      114 Seidenberg, M. S., "A distributed, developmental Model of word recognition and naming" 96 : 523-568, 1989

      115 Ratcliff, R., "A diffusion model for one choice reaction time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation" 108 : 11285-11290, 2011

      116 Ratcliff, R., "A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task" 111 (111): 159-182, 2004

      117 Ratcliff, R., "A diffusion model account of reaction time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data" 9 : 278-291, 2002

      118 Tuerlinckx, F., "A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process" 33 : 443-456, 2001

      119 Vervaat, W., "A Relation between Brownian Bridge and Brownian Excursion" 7 (7): 143-149, 1979

      120 황지영, "(The)effects of word frequency and masking on the distributions of eye fixation durations" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-10-22 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society for Cognitive Science KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.67 1.178 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼