한국형 실천관계 척도 정신장애인 용 개발 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 정신장애인과 사례관리자간의 ‘실천관계(Working Relationship)’를 측정하는 한국형 실천관계 척도 정신장애인 용의 개발 및 타당화를 위해 진행되었다. 척도개발을 위해 첫째, 문헌연구와 정신장애인을 대상으로 3회의 포커스면접을 통해 실천관계척도의 예비문항을 구성하였다. 둘째, 정신장애인과 정신보건사회복지전공 사회복지학과 교수 2인 및 1급 정신보건사회복지사인 실무자 2인의 검토를 통해 최종 예비문항을 선정하였다. 셋째, 최종 선정된 예비문항을 569명의 정신장애인 대상의 실증조사연구를 통해 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 수집된 자료를 무선 분할하여 먼저 탐색적 요인분석(exploratory factor analysis)을 실시한 결과, 3개의 요인구조를 확인하였다. 요인 1은 사례관리자의 전문적 실천과 관련된 ‘전문가 기여’, 요인 2는 ‘부정적인 실천관계’, 요인 3은 사례관리 자와 정신장애인간의 친밀감을 나타내는 ‘정서적 유대’로 나타났다. 나머지 표본을 가지고 확인적 요인 분석(confirmatory factor analysis)을 실시한 결과 모델의 적합도는 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 최종 33문항의 한국형 실천관계 척도 정신장애인 용을 개발 제시하였으며, 본 연구의 사회복지적 함의를 논하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research was carried out in order to develop and validate the Korean Version of Working Relationship Scale for Mentally Disabled Persons, which measures the working relationship between a mentally disabled person and his or her case manager. The first step taken to develop this scale was to construct sample items for the Working Relationship Scale using literature research and three focus group interviews of mentally disabled persons who use local mental health services. Secondly, mentally disabled people were surveyed with these sample items and two professors from the department of social work who specialize in mental health social work and two licensed mental health social workers working in the community mental health field reviewed these sample items to select and compile a final version of the scale. Lastly, the scale’s reliability and validity was verified through an empirical study of 569 mentally disabled persons who surveyed the final selection of items. An explanatory factor analysis showed that the sample items can be grouped into three factors. Factor 1 is ‘Professional Contribution Factor,’ which is related to the professional practice of the case manager; Factor 2 is ‘Negative Working Relationship Factor’; and Factor 3 is ‘Emotional Bond Factor,’ which measures the intimacy between the case manager and the mentally disabled person. A confirmatory analysis of the three-factor format that was discovered in the explanatory factor analysis was carried out with the rest of the randomly divided data, which showed that the model demonstrated a goodness-of-fit. The convergence validity between similar concepts appeared to be appropriate as well. Based on these results, the Korean Version of Working Relationship Scale for Mentally Disabled Persons consisting of a final 33 items is developed and proposed and its implications in social work are discussed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 황태연, "한국판 정신사회재활 성과 측정도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구" 6 (6): 73-88, 1999

2 최명민, "한국인의 정(情)을 고려한 정신보건사회복지 실천방법 모색" 한국정신보건사회복지학회 30 (30): 356-384, 2008

3 권자영, "한국어판 치료적관계척도(STAR-K)의 타당화 연구" 한국정신보건사회복지학회 35 (35): 81-110, 2010

4 김용석, "한국어판 사회복지서비스 이용자 만족도 척도(Client Satisfaction Inventory)의 신뢰도와 타당도 평가 -종합사회복지관을 중심으로-" 한국사회복지학회 59 (59): 83-109, 2007

5 이진향, "프로그램 참여도와 프로그램 환경이 정신장애인의 삶의 만족과 사회적응에 미치는 영향 - 지역사회정신보건센터를 중심으로 -" 한국사회복지연구회 35 (35): 67-92, 2007

6 김희정, "정신장애인의회복증진을위한회복-증진관계도구 (Recovery-Promotion Relationship Scale, RPRS)의타당화연구" 정신간호학회 19 (19): 288-298, 2010

7 권자영, "정신장애인과 사례관리자가 지각하는 실천관계 유형별 특성에 관한 연구" 사회복지연구소 29 (29): 81-111, 2011

8 최세나, "장애자녀 어머니의 임파워먼트(Empowerment)에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 사회복지사와의 관계를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2009

9 김은하, "작업동맹(working alliance)에 관한 국내 연구의 동향" 한국상담심리학회 23 (23): 1-25, 2011

10 탁진국, "심리검사 : 개발과 평가방법의 이해" 학지사 2007

11 반포종합사회복지관, "실천가와 연구자를 위한 사회복지척도집" 나눔의 집 2006

12 송기범, "사회복지실천에서의 문화적 역량과 측정도구에 관한 고찰" 인문사회과학연구소 29 (29): 39-69, 2010

13 양옥경, "사회복지실천에서의 권한부여 모델에 관한 고찰" 143 : 154-173, 1999

14 민소영, "사례관리자와의 치료적 관계가 정신장애 노숙인의 정신건강 외래서비스 이용에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구" 한국정신보건사회복지학회 19 (19): 64-91, 2005

15 임정현, "바우처도입에 따른 사회복지사와 클라이언트 관계변화에 관한 연구동향" 16 : 66-83, 2011

16 김주환, "구조방정식모형으로 논문쓰기" 커뮤니케이션북스 2009

17 Kokotovic, A. M., "Working alliance in the early phase of counseling" 37 : 16-21, 1990

18 Neal, M. S., "Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome in a VA Intensive Case Management Program" 46 : 719-721, 1995

19 McCabe, R., "The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness : A review of methods and findings" 50 (50): 115-128, 2004

20 Priebe, S., "The role of the helping alliance in psychiatric community care : A prospective study" 181 : 552-557, 1993

21 De Leeuw, M., "The quality of the working alliance between chronic psychiatric patients and their case managers : process and outcomes" 19 (19): 1-7, 2012

22 Klinkenberg, W. D., "The helping alliance in case management for homeless persons with severe mental illness" 34 : 569-578, 1998

23 Bordin, E. S., "The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance" 16 : 252-260, 1979

24 Horvath, A. Q., "The development of the working alliance inventory, In The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook" Guilford Press 529-556, 1986

25 Elvins, R., "The conceptualizaion and measurement of therapeutic alliance : An empirical review" 28 : 1167-1187, 2008

26 Chinman, M. J., "The case management relationship and outcomes fo homeless persons with serious mental illness" 51 : 1143-1147, 2000

27 Horvath, A. O., "The alliance, In sychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients" Oxford University Press 37-69, 2002

28 Gelso, C. J., "The Relationship in counseling and psychotherapy : Components, consequences, and theoretical antecedents" 13 : 155-243, 1985

29 Marmar, C. R., "The Development of the Therapeutic Alliance Rating System, In The Psycotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook" Guilford Press 367-390, 1986

30 Lambert, M. J., "Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome, In Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients" Oxford University Press 17-32, 2002

31 Martin, D. J., "Relation of the Therapeutic Alliance with Outcome and Other Variables: A Meta-Analytic Review" 68 (68): 438-450, 2000

32 Horvath, A. O., "Relation Between Working Alliance and Outcome in Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis" 38 (38): 139-149, 1991

33 Russinova, Z., "RPRS(Recovery -Promoting Relationship Scale) Manual" Center for Psychiatric Rehablitation, Boston University 2006

34 Walborn, F. S., "Process Variables : Four Common Elements of Counseling and Psychotherapy" Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co 1996

35 Kline, R. B., "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling" Guilford Press 1998

36 Shirk, S. R., "Prediction of treatment outcome from relationship variables in child and adolescent therapy : A meta-analytic review" 71 (71): 452-464, 2003

37 Finaret, A. E., "Perceptions of professionals about the nature of rehabilitation relationships with persons with mental illness and the dilemmas and conflicts that characterize these relationships" 5 (5): 151-166, 2006

38 Johansson, H., "Patient's opinions on what constitutes good psychiatric care" 17 : 339-346, 2003

39 Gaston, L., "Manual for the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales – CALPAS" Department of Psychiatry, McGill University 1991

40 Booth, M. E., "Effects of program factors on client outcomes: Evaluation of thress clubhouse program for person with severe mental illness" Virginia commonwealth university 1993

41 Barrett-Lennard, G. T., "Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in therapeutic change" 76 : 1-35, 1962

42 Crane-Ross, D., "Consumer and case manager perspectives of service empowerment : Relationship to mental health recovery" 33 (33): 142-155, 2006

43 배병렬, "Amos 17.0 구조방정식모델링-원리와 실제" 도서출판 청람 2009

44 Agnew-Davies, R., "Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure(ARM)" 37 : 155-172, 1998

45 McGuire-Snieckus, R., "A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care : STAR" 37 : 85-95, 2007

46 Tryon, G. S., "A meta-analytic examination of client-therapist perspectives of the working alliance" 17 (17): 629-642, 2007