地域開發을 위한 새마을 廣域圈 開發의 方向定立에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Regional development and Saemaul Movement are considered as two main development activities in our country. These two activities have same ideas and ends on the bases, but these have been regarded as separated movements in the practice. And the consequence of rapid urbanization and industrialization, the realm of life activities gradually widen. So the need for Area-Wide Development in Saemaul Movement has been increased.
On this context, the study on the consideration of relativism between regional development and Area-Wide Development in Saemaul Movement, and the suggestion of improvement alternatives by empirical analysis on the actual condition has great meanings. The purposes of this study could be founded on this context.
The findings of this study could be summarized as followings ;
l. The systemazation of micro view approach on regional development.
2. The establishment of unit index on Area-Wide Development in Saemaul Movement.
3. The improvement of administrative support system.
4. The establishment of civilian initiative system and the enlargement of cooperative thinking.
5. The orientation of comprehensive rural development view.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次
• 第一章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
• 第二章 地域開發과 새마을廣域圈開發의 理論的 背景 = 5
• 第1節 地域開發과 새마을運動의 相關性 = 5
• 1. 地域開發의 意義 = 5
• 2. 새마을運動의 槪念과 推進體系 = 10
• 3. 地域開發과 새마을運動의 關係 = 17
• 第2節 새마을 廣域圈開發의 槪念과 必要城 = 20
• 1. 새마을廣域圈의 槪念 = 20
• 2. 새마을廣域圈開發의 必要性 = 22
• 第3節 새마을廣域圈 設定의 接近方法 = 25
• 1. 새마을廣域圈 設定의 基本方向 = 25
• 2. 새마을廣域圈의 設定基準 = 26
• 第4節 새마을廣域開發의 推進節次 = 29
• 1. 推進節次의 區分 = 29
• 2. 計劃의 樹立 = 31
• 3. 事業의 實施 = 38
• 4. 事業의 評價 = 40
• 第三章 새마을廣域開發의 實態와 問題點 = 43
• 第1節 새마을廣域開發의 推進體系 = 43
• 1. 事業의 選定및 推進體系 = 44
• 2. 指導·技術支援體系 = 45
• 3. 推進狀況 指導·確認體系 = 47
• 第2節 새마을廣域開發의 推進實態 = 48
• 1. 總括的 推進狀況 = 48
• 2. 事業別 推進狀況 = 51
• 第3節 새마을廣域開發의 問題點 = 51
• 第四章 새마을廣域開發의 改善方向 = 54
• 第1節 微視的 地域開發의 體系化 = 54
• 第2節 새마을廣域開發 單位指標의 設定 = 57
• 第3節 行政支援體系의 改善 = 61
• 第4節 民間主導化와 協同意識의 廣域化 = 63
• 第5節 統合的 農村開發의 指向 = 64
• 第五章 結論 = 66
• <參考文獻> = 69
• ABSTRACT = 72