RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Performance evaluation of image fusion techniques for Indian remote sensing satellite data using Z-test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106051367

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Image fusion is being used since last two to three decades in remote sensing for improving visual appearance of coarse resolution imagery using fine spatial resolution data. The resultant outputs are being used successfully in various applications such as image classification, feature extraction, digital change detection, and many more including multi-temporal and multi-scale change detection.
      Acceptability of a fusion method for a particular application depends upon various factors; one of them is quality of fused image. In this research paper the four different image fusion techniques namely Ehlers, IHS fusion, Brovey and FuzeGo have been evaluated using IRS-P6 (Cartosat-1) and RESOURCESAT-2 (LISS-IV) images of Bhopal city, India. Quality of fusion results is assessed by performing visual analysis between fused image and multispectral (MS) image along with statistical analysis. Visual comparison is done based on better visibility of different land cover features such as roads, buildings, water body and sharpness of edges present in image. For statistical evaluation of fusion process, six statistical parameters i.e. standard deviation (SD), correlation coefficient (CC), entropy/ noise, RMSE and ERGAS have been used. In addition to these traditional statistical measures, Z-test is used for combined assessment of fusion techniques. Visual comparisons of fusion results obtained for test site have shown that FuzeGo algorithm has given comparatively better results than other algorithms. Statistical parameter CC, SD are found highest for IHS method, RMSE, and ERGAS are found highest for Brovey method and least noise is added by FuzeGo algorithm. Overall visual analysis and Z-test indicates that FuzeGo has given better results which are followed by Ehlers as compare to other methods.
      번역하기

      Image fusion is being used since last two to three decades in remote sensing for improving visual appearance of coarse resolution imagery using fine spatial resolution data. The resultant outputs are being used successfully in various applications suc...

      Image fusion is being used since last two to three decades in remote sensing for improving visual appearance of coarse resolution imagery using fine spatial resolution data. The resultant outputs are being used successfully in various applications such as image classification, feature extraction, digital change detection, and many more including multi-temporal and multi-scale change detection.
      Acceptability of a fusion method for a particular application depends upon various factors; one of them is quality of fused image. In this research paper the four different image fusion techniques namely Ehlers, IHS fusion, Brovey and FuzeGo have been evaluated using IRS-P6 (Cartosat-1) and RESOURCESAT-2 (LISS-IV) images of Bhopal city, India. Quality of fusion results is assessed by performing visual analysis between fused image and multispectral (MS) image along with statistical analysis. Visual comparison is done based on better visibility of different land cover features such as roads, buildings, water body and sharpness of edges present in image. For statistical evaluation of fusion process, six statistical parameters i.e. standard deviation (SD), correlation coefficient (CC), entropy/ noise, RMSE and ERGAS have been used. In addition to these traditional statistical measures, Z-test is used for combined assessment of fusion techniques. Visual comparisons of fusion results obtained for test site have shown that FuzeGo algorithm has given comparatively better results than other algorithms. Statistical parameter CC, SD are found highest for IHS method, RMSE, and ERGAS are found highest for Brovey method and least noise is added by FuzeGo algorithm. Overall visual analysis and Z-test indicates that FuzeGo has given better results which are followed by Ehlers as compare to other methods.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Zhang, Y., "System and method for image fusion"

      2 Ehlers, M., "Spectral characteristics preserving image fusion based on Fourier domain filtering" 5574 : 1-13, 2004

      3 Alparone, L., "Remote sensing image fusion., Signal and image processing of earth observations series" CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 2015

      4 Vijay Solanky, "Pixel-level image fusion techniques in remote sensing: a review" 대한공간정보학회 24 (24): 475-483, 2016

      5 Pohl, C., "Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing : Concepts, methods and applications" 19 (19): 823-854, 1998

      6 Pohl, C., "Multisensor image fusion guidelines in remote sensing" 2016

      7 Manfred Ehlers, "Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing" Informa UK Limited 1 (1): 25-45, 2010

      8 Hallada, W. A., "Image sharpening for mixed spatial and spectral resolution satellite systems" Environmental Research Institute Michigan 1023-1032, 1983

      9 Damera-Venkata, N., "Image quality assessment based on a degradation model" 9 (9): 636-650, 2000

      10 Wald, L., "Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions : Assessing the quality of resulting images" 63 (63): 691-699, 1997

      1 Zhang, Y., "System and method for image fusion"

      2 Ehlers, M., "Spectral characteristics preserving image fusion based on Fourier domain filtering" 5574 : 1-13, 2004

      3 Alparone, L., "Remote sensing image fusion., Signal and image processing of earth observations series" CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 2015

      4 Vijay Solanky, "Pixel-level image fusion techniques in remote sensing: a review" 대한공간정보학회 24 (24): 475-483, 2016

      5 Pohl, C., "Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing : Concepts, methods and applications" 19 (19): 823-854, 1998

      6 Pohl, C., "Multisensor image fusion guidelines in remote sensing" 2016

      7 Manfred Ehlers, "Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing" Informa UK Limited 1 (1): 25-45, 2010

      8 Hallada, W. A., "Image sharpening for mixed spatial and spectral resolution satellite systems" Environmental Research Institute Michigan 1023-1032, 1983

      9 Damera-Venkata, N., "Image quality assessment based on a degradation model" 9 (9): 636-650, 2000

      10 Wald, L., "Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions : Assessing the quality of resulting images" 63 (63): 691-699, 1997

      11 Wald, L., "Data fusion–Definitions and architectures—Fusion of images of different spatial resolutions" E ´ cole de Mines de Paris 2002

      12 Aiazzi, B., "Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on oversampled multi-resolution analysis" 40 (40): 2300-2312, 2002

      13 Alparone, L., "Comparison of pansharpening algorithms : Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion contest" 10 : 3012-3021, 2007

      14 Zhang, Y., "A review and comparison of commercially available pan- sharpening techniques for high resolution satellite image fusion" 182-185, 2012

      15 Alparone, L., "A new method for MS ? pan image fusion assessment without reference" 3802-3805, 2006

      16 Zhang, Y., "A new merging method and its spectral and spatial effects" 20 (20): 2003-2014, 1999

      17 Alparone, L., "A global quality measurement of pan-sharpened multispectral imagery" 1 (1): 313-317, 2004

      18 Karathanassi, V., "A comparison study on fusion methods using evaluation indicators" 28 (28): 2309-2341, 2007

      19 Sasikala, M., "A comparative analysis of feature based image fusion methods" 6 (6): 1224-1230, 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국공간정보학회 -> 대한공간정보학회 KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-08-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국공간정보학회지 -> Spatial Information Research KCI등재
      2016-01-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Spatial Information Research KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국공간정보학회 논문지 -> 한국공간정보학회지 KCI등재
      2010-05-07 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국GIS학회 -> 한국공간정보학회
      영문명 : Geographic Information Systems Association Of Korea -> Korea Spatial Information Society (KSIS)
      KCI등재
      2010-05-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국GIS학회지 -> 한국공간정보학회 논문지
      외국어명 : The Journal of Geographic Information System Association of Korea -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.68 0.61 0.992 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼