RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      법관과 법철학 = The Judge and Legal Philosophy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60308623

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Seen from the practical point of view, every difficult theoretical problem of legal philosophy is concerned with the question, what judgments and decisions made by judges are correct ones? A good answer to this question can be given by legal philosoph...

      Seen from the practical point of view, every difficult theoretical problem of legal philosophy is concerned with the question, what judgments and decisions made by judges are correct ones? A good answer to this question can be given by legal philosophy as ``integrative jurisprudence``. By ``integrative jurisprudence``, I mean that (i) it analyzes the basic concepts of law; (ii) it explores how these basic concepts are associated with legal institutions as an authoritative coercive order; (iii) it legitimates legal ought or norms of the society in one way or another. Given this, the integration is possible only within judge``s ``activities``; in this sense, judicial activities are integrative activities. Under the rubric of integrative jurisprudence, judges`` process of reasoning for legitimating their judgments should be deemed to be more than merely meeting the requirements of necessary and sufficient conditions or principled consistency. It rather should be understood in terms of the extended human rationality and objectivity. In this regard, special attention needs to be paid to the cognitive models and ``embodied rationality`` that burgeon from human experiences including those of ordinary language. This attention enables us to explain legal conceptualization or categorization better than does the so-called Blackbox Theory or Rule-rationalism. This explanation requires specifying a model case and its relationship with the extended ones. This specification, central to legal reasoning, is basically made through the concept of ``radial category.`` In addition, the role of analogy-the functional similarity or internal correlations among complex phenomena-should be stressed in elucidating the dynamicity of legal reasoning. Next, judges need to be concerned with the role of metaphors in legal thinking and the narrative structure that consists in the combinations or sequences of words and propositions. Lastly, it should be noted that judges` ``correct reasoning`` lies in ``phronesis``-i.e., the realm of practical wisdom that recognizes the importance of ``contexts`` as well as that of the general rules or principles.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 사법연수원 교육발전연구센터, "재판이론과 실무: 법적 판단" 2011

      2 신동운, "재판관의 고민" 법문사 2008

      3 박은정, "왜 법의 지배인가" 돌베개 2010

      4 임마누엘 칸트, "순수이성비판1, A133/B172" 아카넷 2009

      5 로널드 드워킨, "법의 제국" 아카넷 2004

      6 론 L. 풀러, "법의 도덕성" 법문사 1971

      7 김상준, "법관의 의사결정 이론과 실무" 사법발전재단 2010

      8 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학, 제6권과 제7권"

      9 Albert R. Jonsen, "결의론의 남용" 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소 2011

      10 George Lakoff, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" University of Chicago Press 1987

      1 사법연수원 교육발전연구센터, "재판이론과 실무: 법적 판단" 2011

      2 신동운, "재판관의 고민" 법문사 2008

      3 박은정, "왜 법의 지배인가" 돌베개 2010

      4 임마누엘 칸트, "순수이성비판1, A133/B172" 아카넷 2009

      5 로널드 드워킨, "법의 제국" 아카넷 2004

      6 론 L. 풀러, "법의 도덕성" 법문사 1971

      7 김상준, "법관의 의사결정 이론과 실무" 사법발전재단 2010

      8 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학, 제6권과 제7권"

      9 Albert R. Jonsen, "결의론의 남용" 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소 2011

      10 George Lakoff, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" University of Chicago Press 1987

      11 Steven L. Winter, "When Self-Governance is a Game" 67 (67): 1171-1204, 2002

      12 Has-Georg Gadamer, "Wahrheit und Methode, 3. Aufl." J. C. B. MOHR 1972

      13 Herold Berman, "Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History" 76 : 779-801, 1988

      14 Robert Alexy, "The Nature of Legal Philosophy, In Jurisprudence or Legal Science? A Debate about the Nature of Legal Theory" Hart Publishing 51-62, 2005

      15 Aharon Barak, "The Judge in a Democracy" Princeton University Press 2006

      16 Mark Johnson, "The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason" University of Chicago Press 1987

      17 Michael J. Madison, "Rights of Access and the Shape of the Internet" 44 : 433-, 2003

      18 Ludwig Wittgenstein, "Philosophische Untersuchungen" 1953

      19 Brian Leiter, "Naturalizing Jurisprudence. Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy" Oxford University Press 2007

      20 Cass R. Sunstein, "Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict" Honda 1996

      21 Nigel Simmonds, "Law as a Moral Idea" Oxford University Press 2007

      22 Mark Johnson, "Law Incarnate" 67 (67): 949-962, 2002

      23 Jonathan Simon, "Governing through Crime Metaphors" 67 (67): 1035-1069, 2002

      24 Lorie M. Graham, "Cognition, Law, Stories" 10 : 255-290, 2009

      25 Lon L. Fuller, "Anatomy of the Law" Praeger 1968

      26 Gerald M. Edelman, "A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination" Basic Books 2000

      27 Steven L. Winter, "A Clearing in the Forest. Law, Life, and Mind" The University of Chicago Press 2001

      28 사법연수원, "2011년도 재판이론과 실무(1)" 2011

      29 사법연수원, "2010년도 재판이론과 실무: 판단과 의사결정론" 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.55 1.55 1.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.24 1.24 1.583 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼