Theoretical Foundation of the Maker Movement for Education: Learning Theories and Pedagogy of the Maker Movement

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The author investigated the momentum of the maker movement and its educational implications with the following four research questions: 1. What is the maker movement? 2. What is the nature of our societal interest in the maker movement? 3. Which learning theories are associated with the maker movement? 4. What are the educational implications of the maker movement? The author reviewed the history of education in terms of the maker movement and concluded that Papert’s learning-by-making approach provided a theoretical foundation of the maker movement. The maker movement aims to engage participants in Do-It-Yourself(DIY) activities, the spirit of tinkering, and a hands-on approach. Also, the maker movement meets the educational demands of fostering students’ 21st-century abilities and technological literacy. Lastly, the author anticipated the issues that may arise following the introduction of the maker movement in K-12 schools. In conclusion, the author discussed the challenges of the school maker education movement and suggested the bottom-up approach to utilize the school resources of technology and engineering education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fleming, L., "Worlds of making: Best practices for establishing a makerspace for your school" Corwin Press 2015

2 Tudge, J., "Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development" 36 : 61-81, 1993

3 Bevan, B., "Tinkering is serious play" 72 (72): 28-33, 2014

4 Martin, L., "The promise of the maker movement for education" 5 (5): 30-39, 2015

5 Schon, S., "The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching" 39 : 14-25, 2014

6 Halverson, E. R., "The maker movement in education" 84 (84): 495-504, 2014

7 Dougherty, D., "The maker movement" 7 (7): 11-14, 2012

8 Clough, G. W., "The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century" National Academy of Engineering 2004

9 Dewey, J., "The Philosophy of John Dewey" University of Chicago Press 483-493, 1916

10 Hager, P., "The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education" Blackwell Publishing Limited 271-287, 2003

11 National Research Council, "Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology" National Academies Press 2002

12 International Technology Education Association(ITEA/ITEEA), "Standards for technological literacy:Content for the study of technology" International Technology Education Association(ITEA/ITEEA) 2007

13 Resnick, M., "Scratch : programming for all" 52 (52): 60-67, 2009

14 Sanders, M., "STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania" 68 (68): 20-26, 2009

15 Kuznetsov, S., "Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures" ACM 295-304, 2010

16 Watson, M., "Product, competence, project and practice : DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption" 8 (8): 69-89, 2008

17 National Education Association, "Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.”" National Education Association 2012

18 Nodding, N., "Philosophy of education" Westview Press 2011

19 Hakim, L., "Object Lessons: Making, knowing, and growing things" 78 (78): 127-136, 2015

20 Mark Sanders, "New Paradigm or Old Wine? The Status of Technology Education Practice in the United States" Virginia Tech Libraries 12 (12): 2001

21 Office of the Press Secretary of The White House, "New Commitments in Support of the President’s Nation of Makers Initiative to Kick Off 2016 National Week of Making"

22 Papert, S., "Mindstorms : Children, computers, and powerful ideas" Basic Books 1980

23 Burke, J., "Making sense: Can makerspaces work in academic libraries?" 2015

24 Peppler, K., "Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time" 95 (95): 22-27, 2013

25 Billett S., "Learning Through Practice" Springer 59-81, 2010

26 Vygotsky, L., "Interaction between learning and development" 23 (23): 34-41, 1978

27 Morgan M. Hynes, "If you build it, will they come? Student preferences for Makerspace environments in higher education" Springer Nature 28 (28): 867-883, 2018

28 "ISTE Standards for Students"

29 Ferrarin, A., "Homo faber, homo sapiens, or homo politicus? Protagoras and the myth of Prometheus" 54 (54): 289-319, 2000

30 Blikstein, P., "Handbook of Technology Education" Springer International Publishing 2017

31 Weber, K., "Gender-based preferences toward technology education content, activities, and instructional methods" 16 (16): 55-71, 2005

32 Dougherty, D., "Free to make: how the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds" North Atlantic Books 2016

33 Ryu, C., "Foundation of technology education" Chungnam National University Press 2000

34 "Fast fact: Maker faire global 2016" Maker Media, Inc.

35 Blikstein, P., "Fab Labs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors" Transcript Publishers 2013

36 Mikhak, B., "Fab Lab: an alternate model of ICT for development" 2002

37 Dewey, J., "Experience and education" Simon and Schuster 2007

38 Sheppard, S. D., "Educating engineers : Designing for the future of the field(Vol. 2" Jossey-Bass 2008

39 Kelley, T. R., "Design fixation" 77 (77): 15-19, 2017

40 Tanenbaum, J. G., "Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice" ACM 2603-2612, 2013

41 Dorst, K., "Creativity in the design process:co-evolution of problem–solution" 22 (22): 425-437, 2001

42 Christiaans, H. H. C. M., "Creativity in design: the role of domain knowledge in designing" Uitgeverij LEMMA BV 1992

43 Thomasian, J., "Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda: An update of state actions" National Governors Association Center for Best Practices 2011

44 Rousseau, J. J., "A discourse on inequality" Penguin 1984