RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Neuropsychological Outcome One Year after Carotid Revascularization: A before-and-after Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105339914

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The aim of our study was to determine the clinical profile of patients considered cognitive ‘responders’ to surgery in order to establish clinical variables associated with a favorable cognitive performance. Materials and Methods: A total...

      Purpose: The aim of our study was to determine the clinical profile of patients considered cognitive ‘responders’ to surgery in order to establish clinical variables associated with a favorable cognitive performance.
      Materials and Methods: A total of 70 patients were included in the study. A wellvalidated, comprehensive standardized neurocognitive battery of tests of about 2 hours was administered. Patients were examined twice, 1-week before surgery and 1-year postoperatively. The criterion to be included in the ‘responder’ group was the following: to obtain a positive difference between post-revascularization and pre-revascularization neuropsychological assessment ≥1 standard deviation in ≥2 tests.
      Results: Twenty-seven patients (38.6%) were cognitive responders to treatment.
      In bivariate analysis between responders and non-responders, presence of atrophy (P=0.003), small vessels (P=0.577), symptoms (P=0.046), and age (P=0.030) were the factors statistically significant. When comparing cognitive performance before and after carotid revascularization, significant differences were observed in semantic fluency with a lower performance after 12 months (P=0.004, d=0.29), and in the Language index (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) (P=0.005, d=0.34).
      Conclusion: Patients without neurological symptoms, of a younger age and without atrophy and white matter small vessel lesions are better cognitive responders 1-year after carotid revascularization.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Elneihoum AM, "Three-year survival and recurrence after stroke in Malmö, Sweden: an analysis of stroke registry data" 29 : 2114-2117, 1998

      2 Soinne L, "The effect of severe carotid occlusive disease and its surgical treatment on cognitive functions of the brain" 69 : 353-359, 2009

      3 Randolph C, "The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity" 20 : 310-319, 1998

      4 Bossema E, "Testing the laterality hypothesis after left or right carotid endarterectomy: no ipsilateral effects on neuropsychological functioning" 29 : 505-513, 2007

      5 Cohen J, "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" Psychology Press 1988

      6 Peña-Casanova J, "Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA project): methods and sample characteristics" 24 : 307-319, 2009

      7 Balestrini S, "Severe carotid stenosis and impaired cerebral hemodynamics can influence cognitive deterioration" 80 : 2145-2150, 2013

      8 Mathiesen EB, "Reduced neuropsychological test performance in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: The Tromsø study" 62 : 695-701, 2004

      9 Halliday A, "Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial" 363 : 1491-1502, 2004

      10 Lin JH, "Prediction of poststroke dementia" 61 : 343-348, 2003

      1 Elneihoum AM, "Three-year survival and recurrence after stroke in Malmö, Sweden: an analysis of stroke registry data" 29 : 2114-2117, 1998

      2 Soinne L, "The effect of severe carotid occlusive disease and its surgical treatment on cognitive functions of the brain" 69 : 353-359, 2009

      3 Randolph C, "The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity" 20 : 310-319, 1998

      4 Bossema E, "Testing the laterality hypothesis after left or right carotid endarterectomy: no ipsilateral effects on neuropsychological functioning" 29 : 505-513, 2007

      5 Cohen J, "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" Psychology Press 1988

      6 Peña-Casanova J, "Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA project): methods and sample characteristics" 24 : 307-319, 2009

      7 Balestrini S, "Severe carotid stenosis and impaired cerebral hemodynamics can influence cognitive deterioration" 80 : 2145-2150, 2013

      8 Mathiesen EB, "Reduced neuropsychological test performance in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: The Tromsø study" 62 : 695-701, 2004

      9 Halliday A, "Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial" 363 : 1491-1502, 2004

      10 Lin JH, "Prediction of poststroke dementia" 61 : 343-348, 2003

      11 Ogasawara K, "Postoperative cerebral hyperperfusion associated with impaired cognitive function in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy" 102 : 38-44, 2005

      12 Heyer EJ, "Neuropsychometric changes in patients after carotid endarterectomy" 29 : 1110-1115, 1998

      13 Rao R, "Neuropsychological impairment in stroke, carotid stenosis, and peripheral vascular disease, A comparison with healthy community residents" 30 : 2167-2173, 1999

      14 Heyer EJ, "Neuropsychological dysfunction in the absence of structural evidence for cerebral ischemia after uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy" 58 : 474-480, 2006

      15 Fukunaga S, "Neuropsychological changes in patients with carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy" 55 : 145-150, 2006

      16 Lezak MD, "Neuropsychological assessment" Oxford University Press 1995

      17 Brand N, "Left or right carotid endarterectomy in patients with atherosclerotic disease:ipsilateral effects on cognition?" 54 : 117-123, 2004

      18 Rocque BG, "Impaired cognitive function in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis and correlation with ultrasound strain measurements" 322 : 20-24, 2012

      19 Mukherjee D, "Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke" 76 (76): S85-S90, 2011

      20 Mononen H, "Early neuropsychological outcome after carotid endarterectomy" 30 : 328-333, 1990

      21 Bossema ER, "Does carotid endarterectomy improve cognitive functioning?" 41 : 775-781, 2005

      22 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual - text revision" American Psychiatric Association 2000

      23 Paraskevas KI, "Comparison of cognitive function after carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy" 47 : 221-231, 2014

      24 Feliziani FT, "Cognitive performance in elderly patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting:a twelve-month follow-up study" 30 : 244-251, 2010

      25 Bakker FC, "Cognitive impairment in patients with carotid artery occlusion and ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks" 250 : 1340-1347, 2003

      26 Fearn SJ, "Carotid endarterectomy improves cognitive function in patients with exhausted cerebrovascular reserve" 26 : 529-536, 2003

      27 Muller M, "Carotid atherosclerosis and progression of brain atrophy: the SMART-MR study" 70 : 237-244, 2011

      28 Demarin V, "Carotid artery disease and cognitive impairment" 322 : 107-111, 2012

      29 Romero JR, "Carotid artery atherosclerosis, MRI indices of brain ischemia, aging, and cognitive impairment: the Framingham study" 40 : 1590-1596, 2009

      30 Heyer EJ, "A study of cognitive dysfunction in patients having carotid endarterectomy performed with regional anesthesia" 107 : 636-642, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-07-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한혈관외과학회지 -> Vascular Specialist International KCI등재후보
      2014-02-18 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery -> Vascular specialist international KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.04 0.04 0.04
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.03 0.03 0.289 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼