현행 즉결심판절차의 문제점과 개선방안 = The Problems and Remedies for the Current Proceedings for Summary Judgments

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the South Korean constitution it states, "All citizens shall have the right to trial in conformity with the Act" (Constitution Article 27 - 1) and "All citizens shall have the right to a speedy trial. The accused shall have the right to a public trial without delay in the absence of justifiable reasons to the contrary." (Constitution Article 27 - 3)
It also stipulates, "The accused shall be presumed innocent until a judgment of guilt has been pronounced" (Constitution Article 27- 4) and "A victim of a crime shall be entitled to make a statement during the proceedings of the trial of the case involved as under the conditions prescribed by the Act." (Constitution Article 27 - 5)
As above, the constitution prescribes the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental right of the accused.
The fundamental principle of a speedy trial is to protect the rights of the accused, however at the same time based upon public interest via finding of substantial truth, judicial economy, securing public trust in trial and achieving purpose of punishment.
The Constitutional Court of Korea ruled that the fundamental principle of a speedy trial is to protect the basic rights of the accused, however, it can be considered to have a dual nature due to its impact on public interest via finding of substantial truth, judicial economy, securing public trust in trial and achieving purpose of punishment thus it has a pivotal role as a fundamental right in the criminal justice system.
Despite speedy trials being the fundamental constitutional principle that ensures basic rights of the public and efficiency of the criminal judicature, traditionally the issues regarding delays in litigations and its associated side effects in the South Korean criminal trials have been raised.
In the judicial reform started in 2004, speedy trials were raised a major agenda and the revised Criminal Procedure Bill submitted by the government in 2006 implemented a 'fast track procedure' to increase efficiency of criminal proceedings.
However the 'fast track procedure' included in this bill failed to be legislated.
In reality a large number of cases need to be handled with limited jurisdictional resources.
Therefore application of the choice and concentration principle is necessary to process minor cases with summary proceedings and complex/major cases through thorough process of trial and provide a judgment that coincides with the substantial truth.
Application of strategies aimed at prompt proceedings within the current Criminal Procedure Act has led to implementation of the proceedings for summary judgments, summary procedures, and summary trial procedures. This study aims to examine the applications of the proceedings for summary judgments designed to increase efficiency within the existing laws and identify its issues and discuss strategies for improvement.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
• Ⅱ. 현행법상의 즉결심판절차
• Ⅲ. 즉결심판절차의 현황과 그 분석
• Ⅳ. 현행 즉결심판절차의 문제점과 개선방안
• Ⅴ. 결언
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강구진, "형사소송법원론" 학연사 1982

2 정웅석, "형사소송법 전정제3판" 대명출판사 2009

3 노명선, "형사소송법" 성균관대학교 출판부 2013

4 차용석, "형사소송법" 21세기사 2013

5 조균석, "형사소송법" 박영사 2015

6 송광섭, "형사소송법" 형설출판사 2013

7 곽영길, "현행 즉결심판제도의 개선방안 연구" 한국경호경비학회 (13) : 47-70, 2007

8 김병화, "한국사법사(현세편)" 일조각 1980

9 황태정, "즉결심판제도의 문제점과 개선방향" 한국형사정책연구원 2003

10 임석순, "즉결심판제도에 대한 비판적 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 26 (26): 85-113, 2015

11 한영수, "즉결심판제도에 대한 비판적 고찰" 9 (9): 1998

12 최응렬, "즉결심판제도에 관한 고찰" 한국공안행정학회 (9) : 2000

13 하태훈, "즉결심판절차와 피고인의 인권" (85) : 2000

14 김용우, "즉결심판절차에서의 신속성과 절차적 보장문제" 한국형사정책학회 13 (13): 2001

15 백형구, "즉결심판절차법의 제 문제" 133 : 1987

16 임호, "즉결심판절차법에 관한 고찰" 법원행정처 (17) : 1990

17 손동권, "즉결사건처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안" 10 (10): 1996

18 배종대, "신형사소송법" 홍문사 2012

19 신동운, "신형사소송법" 法文社 2014

20 신양균, "신판 형사소송법" 화산미디어 2009

21 손동권, "새로운 형사소송법" 세창출판사 2014

22 "사법개혁을 위한 제3차 법관세미나 결과보고서" 법원행정처 1991

23 대검찰청, "범죄분석, 2011 ‒ 2014년"

24 송광섭, "경죄사건의 신속처리절차에 관한 연구" 대검찰청 2012

25 박상기, "경범죄처벌법에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 1993

26 송광섭, "경미사건의 효율적 처리방안" 한국형사법학회 (19) : 47-84, 2003

27 심희기, "경미범죄에 대한 형사정책의 실태와 시민의 반응 – 범칙금 통고처분과 즉결심판실무를 중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 11 (11): 2000

28 성윤환, "現行 卽決審判制度의 問題點과 改善方案" 중앙법학회 8 (8): 113-156, 2006