기본권의 대사인적 효력에 관한 검토 = 미국 국가행위의제이론의 수용과 관련하여

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Traditionally, the constitutional rights is understood to be a defense right against infringement from government power to protect individual freedom and right, so the validity is not considered to be in effect between equal private persons. However, in the modern times, the constitutional rights have frequently intruded by individuals who have enormous social and economic powers such as conglomerates, labor unions and political parties.
Under these circumstances, in order to practically guarantee personal freedom, ‘the effect of fundamental rights to the privates’ that fundamental right does not only bind government power, but also bind the relation between private persons emerged.
Currently, there are no big arguments about whether the effect of fundamental rights to the privates should be admitted or not, instead, as there is no specified law in Korea Constitution, so many judicial precedents and theories are discussed on what basis should the third effect of fundamental rights be admitted.
In America, the issue of the effect of fundamental rights to the privates was raised for the solution of racism. "State Action Theory" was born and has been developed in the United States by the decisions of U.S. Supreme Court. According to the Article 14 of the U.S. Constitution, the State should obey the due process in depriving the life, liberty and property of the people and should provide equal protection of laws. Hence, some private actions could constitute state action to which the Article 14 of the U.S. Constitution could apply.
Presently, Korea jurisdiction doesn’t show consistent attitude in dealing with the third effect of fundamental rights. However, through many judicial precedents and as scholars take indirect effect theory, Korea is introducing the idea of public law that respects and guarantees fundamental law without pulling down dual system of public and private law, maintaining the jurisdiction principle of freedom and private autonomy. In order to approach this problem, I will research “State Action Theory” in America and review the acceptance of the theory in Korea.
Finally, this paper is intended to review the requirements on effect of fundamental rights between private individuals, life normativity of constitutional law and so on. This approach will be helpful to understand the issue in relation to the effect of fundamental rights to the privates. It will give the chance to review the horizontal effect debates in Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 기본권의 대사인적 효력에 관한 종래의 학설과 판례
• Ⅲ. 미국의 국가행위의제이론의 국내 수용성 검토
• Ⅳ. 결론 : 사법관계에서 기본권의 적용방식에 대한 재고
• 【참고문헌】
• 【Abstract】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송기춘, "환경권의 대사인적 효력" 공법연구 28 (3), 2001

2 양천수, "현대사회와 민사법의 구조변동" 경인문화사, 2011

3 김학성, "헌법학원론" 박영사, 2012

4 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사, 2002

5 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 법문사, 2012

6 김철수, "헌법학 신론" 박영사 박영사, []

7 성낙인, "헌법학" 法文社 법문사, 2013

8 강경선, "헌법의 기초" 한국방송통신대학교 출판부, 2012

9 백경일, "헌법규정이 사적 법률관계에서 고려될 수 있는 한계" 안암법학 (43) : 137 ~ 196, 2014

10 양 건, "헌법강의" 法文社 법문사, 2007

11 전광석, "한국헌법론" 법문사, 2014

12 이재희, "평등권의 대사인효와 그 구체적 적용방식:일반조항 해석과 관련하여" 저스티스 138 : 5 ~ 36, 2013

13 정재황, "신헌법입문" 박영사, 2013

14 이노홍, "신인령 선생님 정년기념논문집" 2008

15 김선택, "사법질서에 있어서 기본권의 효력" 고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 (39), 2002

16 황우여, "민사판례연구" 박영사, 1991

17 이노홍, "미국연방헌법상 국가행위(STATE ACTION)이론에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 이화여자대학교 대학원, 2002

18 장영철, "기본권의 제3자적 효력과 기본권보호의무" 공법연구 29 (2), 2001

19 임규철, "기본권의 대사인적 효력 –독일에서의 학설과 판례를 중심으로-,”" 공법연구 32 (2), 2003

20 한병호, "권영성교수정년기념논문집" 법문사, 1999

21 송기춘, "국가의 기본권보장의무에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 서울대학교 대학원, 1999

22 김대환, "私法秩序에서의 기본권의 효력 - 독일에서의 논의를 중심으로 -" 헌법학연구 16 (4) : 117 ~ 163, 2010

23 임지봉, "州行爲理論과 美國 聯邦大法院" 미국헌법연구 21 (1) : 313 ~ 343, 2010

24 장영철, "基本權의 第3者的(對私人的) 效力에 관한 理論的 硏究" 공법연구 37 (3) : 33 ~ 58, 2009