RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      走向冲突解决的四层模式 = TOWARDS A FOUR-TIERED MODEL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to lay down the foundations upon which stands an unprecedented and unparalleled four-tiered model of conflict resolution, which is bound to be a seismic shift in the remit of mediation. The foregoing model of conflict resolution rests upon four pillars. The first pillar has been coined the social dynamics of conflict resolution. The second pillar has been dubbed the cultural dynamics of conflict resolution. The third pillar has been baptized the legal dynamics of conflict resolution. Finally, the fourth pillar has been called the cross-border and cross-cultural dynamics of conflict resolution.
      The overriding goal of this paper is to carve out a functional conflict resolution framework amenable to assuage the yawning chasm between law and the underlying social reality of/in a given jurisdiction. To cater to that, this paper endeavours to cast a new light on the polymath Professor Niklas Luhmann´s ground-breaking academic work with a view to support my central claim that social sub-systems (ranging from culture, society, religion, political ideology, economy, philosophy, and law) have permanently interacted with each other throughout the vast swathes of history (and) for a long-winded time. Following on the heels of such assertion, the sweeping objective underpinning this paper is to set forth a full-fledged and comprehensive model of conflict resolution that parses mediation in four perspectives with a view to yield both a sought-after long-term harmony-equilibrium and a wealth procedural maximization across jurisdictions.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to lay down the foundations upon which stands an unprecedented and unparalleled four-tiered model of conflict resolution, which is bound to be a seismic shift in the remit of mediation. The foregoing model of conflict resolution rests ...

      This paper aims to lay down the foundations upon which stands an unprecedented and unparalleled four-tiered model of conflict resolution, which is bound to be a seismic shift in the remit of mediation. The foregoing model of conflict resolution rests upon four pillars. The first pillar has been coined the social dynamics of conflict resolution. The second pillar has been dubbed the cultural dynamics of conflict resolution. The third pillar has been baptized the legal dynamics of conflict resolution. Finally, the fourth pillar has been called the cross-border and cross-cultural dynamics of conflict resolution.
      The overriding goal of this paper is to carve out a functional conflict resolution framework amenable to assuage the yawning chasm between law and the underlying social reality of/in a given jurisdiction. To cater to that, this paper endeavours to cast a new light on the polymath Professor Niklas Luhmann´s ground-breaking academic work with a view to support my central claim that social sub-systems (ranging from culture, society, religion, political ideology, economy, philosophy, and law) have permanently interacted with each other throughout the vast swathes of history (and) for a long-winded time. Following on the heels of such assertion, the sweeping objective underpinning this paper is to set forth a full-fledged and comprehensive model of conflict resolution that parses mediation in four perspectives with a view to yield both a sought-after long-term harmony-equilibrium and a wealth procedural maximization across jurisdictions.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. The importance of the topic 2. The structure of the Essay 3. The novelty of the Essay 4. An overview on the key concepts brought forth in the Essay: from the concept of collective sensemaking to the concept of social sub-systems in permanent interaction 5. (Gaps in the) extant literature regarding the styles of mediation: The influence of philosophy of law and schools of thought in shaping the current styles of mediation 6. To what extent does the four-tiered model of conflict resolution bridges the pinpointed gaps of the foregoing styles of mediation 7. A snapshot on the foundations of adaptive mediation, incorporative mediation and the philosophical foundations of the concept of effective access to justice an extension of the Rule of Law 8. Cross-Border and Cross-Cultural Dynamics of Conflict resolution against the backdrop of China´s “One Belt, One Road: An overview on its foundations 9. How should a four-tiered model of conflict resolution of conflict resolution look like in Macau
      • 1. The importance of the topic 2. The structure of the Essay 3. The novelty of the Essay 4. An overview on the key concepts brought forth in the Essay: from the concept of collective sensemaking to the concept of social sub-systems in permanent interaction 5. (Gaps in the) extant literature regarding the styles of mediation: The influence of philosophy of law and schools of thought in shaping the current styles of mediation 6. To what extent does the four-tiered model of conflict resolution bridges the pinpointed gaps of the foregoing styles of mediation 7. A snapshot on the foundations of adaptive mediation, incorporative mediation and the philosophical foundations of the concept of effective access to justice an extension of the Rule of Law 8. Cross-Border and Cross-Cultural Dynamics of Conflict resolution against the backdrop of China´s “One Belt, One Road: An overview on its foundations 9. How should a four-tiered model of conflict resolution of conflict resolution look like in Macau
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼