소현세자의 2차 귀국을 통해 본 도르곤의 對조선 전략 = Dorgon's Strategies for Joseon Seen through the Second Return of Crown Prince Sohyeon

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Around 1644, when Qing completed the occupation of Beijing, there were remarkable changes in the relationship between Joseon-Qing. The heavy ‘Annual Tribute Payment’ imposed on Joseon was greatly reduced, and Crown Prince Sohyeon, who had been held as a hostage, returned to Joseon. In addition, regular envoys to the Qing were also integrated once a year, and the amount of gift provided for Qing envoys was also reduced. The Joseon-Qing relationship, which had been characterized bya series of tensions and conflicts, seemed to begin stabilizing from Ming-Qing Transition.
Existing studies have consistently focused on Qing's “Enterting the Pass” as a decisive factor in these changes around 1644. In fact, the Ming fall and the Qing conquest of China removed major variables in the Joseon-Qing relationship. At that time, regency Dorgon also decided to send Crown Prince Sohyeon back to Joseon, and cited the Qing conquest of China as the reason. In other words, since then Qing's “Enterting the Pass” has been pointed out as a marked watershed in the Joseon-Qing relationship, and Crown Prince Sohyeon's return has been regarded as supporting the idea.
However, the changes in the Joseon-Qing relationship are not explained by “Enter the Pass” alone. This is because that began in 1643, a year before “Entering the Pass” by Qing. Therefore, I think there was another variable worth our attention, other than “Enter the Pass” against a background of the conversion of the Joseon-Qing relationship. In this study, it is the regency of Dorgon that is presented as the keyvariable.
After Hong Taiji's death in 1643, Dorgon, who seized power in an unusual way, used Joseon to extend his power base. Immediately after Dorgon became regent, he planned and realized Crown Prince Sohyeon's second return. It was to strengthen ties with Crown Prince Sohyeon, the next heir to the throne of Joseon. Crown Prince Sohyeon's second return was to show Dorgon's strategy for Joseon in advance. After “Entering the Pass,” Dorgon tried to augment his influence in Joseon by permanently returning Crown Prince Sohyeon. The challenge of getting adequate compensation for his investment has begun.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김선민, "欄頭: 청-조선 조공관계의 변경적 측면" 대구사학회 96 : 151-187, 2009

2 김한규, "한중관계사" 아르케 1999

3 우경섭, "한국의 대외관계와 외교사 조선편" 동북아역사재단 2018

4 홍성구, "청질서의 성립과 조청관계의 안정화: 1644∼1700" 동양사학회 (140) : 155-194, 2017

5 이블린 S. 로스키, "청 황실의 사회사" 까치 2010

6 구범진, "조선의 청 황제 성절 축하와 건륭 칠순 ‘진하 외교’" 규장각한국학연구원 (68) : 215-248, 2014

7 구범진, "병자호란, 홍타이지의 전쟁" 까치 2009

8 안유림, "명청교체기 瀋陽館의 역할" 규장각한국학연구원 (50) : 57-81, 2010

9 마크 C. 엘리엇, "만주족의 청제국" 푸른역사 2009

10 劉爲, "試論攝政王多爾袞的朝鮮政策" 15 (15): 2005

11 周遠廉趙世瑜, "皇父攝政王多爾袞全傳" 吉林文史出版社 1986

12 玄花, "瀋館宗藩外交硏究(1637-1644)" 吉林大學 2013

13 "瀋陽狀啓"

14 "瀋陽日記"

15 劉家駒, "淸朝初期的中韓關係" 文史哲出版社 1986

16 최소자, "淸初의 王位繼承과 多爾袞" 9 : 1970

17 哈斯巴根, "淸初滿蒙關系演變硏究" 北京大學出版社 2016

18 李鴻彬, "淸初傑出的女政治家" 2 : 1998

19 張存武, "淸代中韓關係論文集" 臺灣商務印書館 1987

20 "淸世祖實錄"

21 홍선이, "歲幣･方物을 통해 본 朝淸관계의 특징－인조대 歲幣･方物의 구성과 재정 부담을 중심으로－" 고려사학회 (55) : 257-295, 2014

22 김용덕, "昭顯世子硏究" 18 : 1964

23 領木開, "明淸交替と朝鮮外交" 刀水書房 2021

24 "承政院日記"

25 구범진, "崇德年間 淸朝의 朝鮮 王室 冊封과 冊封文書" 명청사학회 (52) : 71-106, 2019

26 "同文彙考"

27 "勅使謄錄"

28 최소자, "全海宗博士 華甲紀念史學論叢" 일조각 1979

29 "仁祖實錄"

30 楊聯陞, "中國制度史硏究" 江蘇人民出版社 2007

31 이명제, "17세기 청･조선 관계 연구" 동국대학교 2021

32 張禎洙, "17세기 전반 朝鮮과 後金淸의 國交 수립 과정 연구" 고려대학교 2020

33 惠男, "17世纪清朝和朝鲜关系的演进: 女真国金国大清国" 山東大學 2017

34 박민수, "1644년 山海關 전투와 淸軍의 北京 입성" 중국사학회 (110) : 103-145, 2017