RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      경허 가사에 나타난 수행법과 표현 방식

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76267765

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The monk Kyung-hoe is considered one of the famous Buddhist Gasa poets of the late Chosun dynasty. He composed four pieces of Gasa in Korean, about two hundred and fifty pieces of Gatha(偈頌), and fifty essays in Chinese throughout his life. He differed from other monks by his composition of Gasa in Korean and Gatha in Chinese, and especially in his way of Buddhist practice and the way he expressed it in his Gasa. From among monk Kyung-hoe’s many literary works, I studied the way of Buddhist practice and his expression of it in his Gasa.
      First, I found that Kyung-hoe’s Gasa talks about two kinds of Buddhist practice: cause-effect practice and transcendental practice. The cause-effect way of practice in his Gasa means that good cause results in good effect and bad cause results in bad effect. The transcendental way of practice in his Gasa consists of three kinds of Son meditation: Hwado Son meditation, reflecting on oneself meditation, and observing all thinking and acting meditation. Kyung-hoe tried to teach novices the way of cause-effect practice and help them advance to the higher level of transcendental practice.
      Next, I studied Kyung-hoe’s way of expressing Buddhist practice in two aspects: sentence and paragraph. Kyung-hoe used declarative and interrogative sentences to a great degree in his three Buddhist Gasa works. Both the declarative sentences and the interrogative sentences were used to clearly express Buddhist lessons and the positive and negative realities of the people. Kyung-hoe also used exclamatory sentences to express admiration for the Buddhist lessons or to sigh over the people’s painful realities. In addition, he used the petition sentence and the imperative sentence in advising or ordering people. Almost all of the sentences in Kyung-hoe’s Gasa are very plain.
      In regard to his paragraphs, three of Kyung-hoe’s Gasa--〈Chamsongog 參禪曲〉, 〈Gagagaoum 可歌可吟〉, and 〈Pubmungog 法門曲〉--showed similarities and dissimilarities. There were similarities in that his three Gasa all have the “paragraph of advising”, the “paragraph of problems”, and the “paragraph of solving” in common. There were dissimilarities in the ordering of the paragraphs: A paragraph of problem-〉A paragraph of solving-〉B paragraph of problem-〉B paragraph of solving-〉the paragraph of advising in 〈Chamsongog 參禪曲〉; the paragraph of advising-〉A paragraph of problem-〉A paragraph of solving-〉B paragraph of problem-〉B paragraph of solving in 〈Gagagaoum 可歌可吟〉; A paragraph of advising-〉A paragraph of problem-〉A paragraph of solving-〉B paragraph of advising-〉B paragraph of solving-〉C paragraph of advising-〉C paragraph of solving-〉D paragraph of advising in 〈Pubmungog 法門曲〉. These styles of paragraph order were very effective in teaching Buddhism to the people.
      I studied two aspects of three pieces of Kyung-hoe’s Buddhist Gasa, but there still remain his Gathas and prose in Chinese to study in several aspects. First, one could do a comparative study between Kyung-hoe’s Gasa and his other literary works. Second, one could do a comparative study between all his literary works and that of other monk’s.
      번역하기

      The monk Kyung-hoe is considered one of the famous Buddhist Gasa poets of the late Chosun dynasty. He composed four pieces of Gasa in Korean, about two hundred and fifty pieces of Gatha(偈頌), and fifty essays in Chinese throughout his life. He diff...

      The monk Kyung-hoe is considered one of the famous Buddhist Gasa poets of the late Chosun dynasty. He composed four pieces of Gasa in Korean, about two hundred and fifty pieces of Gatha(偈頌), and fifty essays in Chinese throughout his life. He differed from other monks by his composition of Gasa in Korean and Gatha in Chinese, and especially in his way of Buddhist practice and the way he expressed it in his Gasa. From among monk Kyung-hoe’s many literary works, I studied the way of Buddhist practice and his expression of it in his Gasa.
      First, I found that Kyung-hoe’s Gasa talks about two kinds of Buddhist practice: cause-effect practice and transcendental practice. The cause-effect way of practice in his Gasa means that good cause results in good effect and bad cause results in bad effect. The transcendental way of practice in his Gasa consists of three kinds of Son meditation: Hwado Son meditation, reflecting on oneself meditation, and observing all thinking and acting meditation. Kyung-hoe tried to teach novices the way of cause-effect practice and help them advance to the higher level of transcendental practice.
      Next, I studied Kyung-hoe’s way of expressing Buddhist practice in two aspects: sentence and paragraph. Kyung-hoe used declarative and interrogative sentences to a great degree in his three Buddhist Gasa works. Both the declarative sentences and the interrogative sentences were used to clearly express Buddhist lessons and the positive and negative realities of the people. Kyung-hoe also used exclamatory sentences to express admiration for the Buddhist lessons or to sigh over the people’s painful realities. In addition, he used the petition sentence and the imperative sentence in advising or ordering people. Almost all of the sentences in Kyung-hoe’s Gasa are very plain.
      In regard to his paragraphs, three of Kyung-hoe’s Gasa--〈Chamsongog 參禪曲〉, 〈Gagagaoum 可歌可吟〉, and 〈Pubmungog 法門曲〉--showed similarities and dissimilarities. There were similarities in that his three Gasa all have the “paragraph of advising”, the “paragraph of problems”, and the “paragraph of solving” in common. There were dissimilarities in the ordering of the paragraphs: A paragraph of problem-〉A paragraph of solving-〉B paragraph of problem-〉B paragraph of solving-〉the paragraph of advising in 〈Chamsongog 參禪曲〉; the paragraph of advising-〉A paragraph of problem-〉A paragraph of solving-〉B paragraph of problem-〉B paragraph of solving in 〈Gagagaoum 可歌可吟〉; A paragraph of advising-〉A paragraph of problem-〉A paragraph of solving-〉B paragraph of advising-〉B paragraph of solving-〉C paragraph of advising-〉C paragraph of solving-〉D paragraph of advising in 〈Pubmungog 法門曲〉. These styles of paragraph order were very effective in teaching Buddhism to the people.
      I studied two aspects of three pieces of Kyung-hoe’s Buddhist Gasa, but there still remain his Gathas and prose in Chinese to study in several aspects. First, one could do a comparative study between Kyung-hoe’s Gasa and his other literary works. Second, one could do a comparative study between all his literary works and that of other monk’s.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 이원적 수행 방법
      • 3. 문장과 단락상의 표현 방식
      • 4. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 이원적 수행 방법
      • 3. 문장과 단락상의 표현 방식
      • 4. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • [Abstract]
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김주곤, "한국불교가사연구" 집문당 1-317, 1994

      2 이상보, "한국불교 가사의 역사적 고찰 in 조선시대 시가의 연구" 이회문화사 436-454, 1993

      3 전재강, "침굉가사 ‘태평곡’의 구조와 작품에 나타난 선의 성격" 안동어문학회 10 : 83-109, 2005

      4 전재강, "침굉 가사에 나타난 선의 성격과 진술 방식" 우리말글학회 37 : 275-308, 2006

      5 서종범, "조선 중·후기의 선풍에 관한 연구 in 한국종교사상의 재조명" 원광대학교 출판국 389-423, 1993

      6 이상보, "정토에의 몰입과 귀의 in 불교문학 연구 입문" 동화출판공사 185-201, 1991

      7 몽산화상, "역주 몽산화상법어약록언해" 세종대왕기념사업회 1-250, 2002

      8 교육원 불학연구소, "수행법 연구" 조계종출판사 1-967, 2005

      9 이철교, "선학사전" 불지사 1-986, 1995

      10 고봉원묘, "선요" 운주사 1-240, 2006

      1 김주곤, "한국불교가사연구" 집문당 1-317, 1994

      2 이상보, "한국불교 가사의 역사적 고찰 in 조선시대 시가의 연구" 이회문화사 436-454, 1993

      3 전재강, "침굉가사 ‘태평곡’의 구조와 작품에 나타난 선의 성격" 안동어문학회 10 : 83-109, 2005

      4 전재강, "침굉 가사에 나타난 선의 성격과 진술 방식" 우리말글학회 37 : 275-308, 2006

      5 서종범, "조선 중·후기의 선풍에 관한 연구 in 한국종교사상의 재조명" 원광대학교 출판국 389-423, 1993

      6 이상보, "정토에의 몰입과 귀의 in 불교문학 연구 입문" 동화출판공사 185-201, 1991

      7 몽산화상, "역주 몽산화상법어약록언해" 세종대왕기념사업회 1-250, 2002

      8 교육원 불학연구소, "수행법 연구" 조계종출판사 1-967, 2005

      9 이철교, "선학사전" 불지사 1-986, 1995

      10 고봉원묘, "선요" 운주사 1-240, 2006

      11 휴정, "선가귀감언해 상하" 박이정 1-277, 2006

      12 청허휴정, "선가귀감" 예문서원 1-581, 2003

      13 대혜종고, "서장" 운주사 1-439, 2004

      14 이기영, "불교개론" 한국불교연구원 1-68, 1977

      15 김종진, "불교가사의 유통사적 고찰" 동국대학교 한국문학연구소 23 : 153-168, 2000

      16 김종진, "불교가사의 口演과 주제구현방식의 관련양상" 국어국문학회 130 : 131-156, 2002

      17 임기중, "불교가사연구" 동국대학교 출판부 1-486, 2001

      18 김기종, "불교가사 작가에 관한 일고찰" 한국불교어문학회 6 : 277-325, 2001

      19 임기중, "불교가사 원전연구" 동국대학교 출판부 1-1155, 2000

      20 이상보, "불교가사 연구 하 in 조선시대 시가의 연구" 이회문화사 384-435, 1993

      21 이상보, "불교가사 연구 상 in 조선시대 시가의 연구" 이회문화사 363-383, 1993

      22 임기중, "불교가사 1∼5권, 현대불교신서74∼78" 동국대학교 부설 역경원 1-199, 1993

      23 김승동, "불교·인도사상사전" 부산대학교 출판부 1-2351, 2001

      24 전재강, "불교 관련시조의 사적 전개와 유형적 특성" 한국시가학회 9 : 337-361, 2001

      25 윤천광, "경허큰스님-착한일 많이 하게 그대가 부처일세" 1-287, 1996

      26 경허, "경허집" 극락선원 1-374, 1990

      27 한중광, "경허의 선사상-돈점관을 중심으로-" 백련불교문화재단 5 : 7-29, 1996

      28 한중광, "경허" 한길사 1-349, 1999

      29 대한불교 조계종 포교원 포교연구실, "간화선입문" 조계종출판사 1-214, 2006

      30 전국선원수좌회 편찬추진위원, "간화선" 조계종출판사 1-437, 2005

      31 釋惺牛, "鏡虛集 in 韓國佛敎全書 第十一冊" 동국대학교 출판부 587-701, 1993

      32 경허, "鏡虛法語" 인물연구소 1-747, 1981

      33 영가현각, "禪宗永嘉集" 삼영출판사 1-394, 1981

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.56 0.56 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.53 0.99 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼