RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      국가암검진 권고안 제·개정 연구방법론 = Methodology of revision of Korean national cancer screening guideline

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104741810

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) was established to provide cancer screening services for low-income Medicaid recipients in 1999. Since then, the NCSP has expanded its target population to include National Health Insurance beneficiaries. C...

      The National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) was established to provide cancer screening services for low-income Medicaid recipients in 1999. Since then, the NCSP has expanded its target population to include National Health Insurance beneficiaries. Currently, the program targets the five most common types of cancer in Korea: stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer. The National Cancer Center has been involved in developing and revising the practice guidelines for the NCSP in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Welfare and related academic societies. The main methodological principles of development were determined as follows: an evidence-based approach to the development of recommendations on cancer screening was used, that the recommendation could be drawn by an adaptation process if evidence-based current reliable clinical practice guidelines were available, and that the level of evidence was assessed by methodologies. The process of recommendation development was divided into planning, development, and finalization steps. Planning tasks consisted of selection of clinical practice guideline topics, organization of a clinical practice guideline development group, reviewing the existing clinical practice guidelines, establishment of development plans, and definition of key questions. Development tasks consisted of steps including searching the literature evidence base, assessment of the quality of evidence, integration of evidence, and formulation of recommendations and deciding on the recommendation grade. The finalization tasks included external review, up-dating of the plan, and publication of the clinical practice guidelines.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 US Preventive Services Task Force, "Procedure manual [Inter-net]. Rockville : US Preventive Services Task Force"

      2 Kim SY, "National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention" National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency 2011

      3 US Preventive Services Task Force, "Grade definitions [Inter-net]. Rockville : US Preventive Services Task Force"

      4 Schunemann H, "GRADE hand-book : introduction to GRADE handbook"

      5 Graham R, "Clinical practice guidelines we can trust" National Academies Press 2011

      6 Brouwers MC, "AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II : advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care" 51 : 421-424, 2010

      1 US Preventive Services Task Force, "Procedure manual [Inter-net]. Rockville : US Preventive Services Task Force"

      2 Kim SY, "National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention" National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency 2011

      3 US Preventive Services Task Force, "Grade definitions [Inter-net]. Rockville : US Preventive Services Task Force"

      4 Schunemann H, "GRADE hand-book : introduction to GRADE handbook"

      5 Graham R, "Clinical practice guidelines we can trust" National Academies Press 2011

      6 Brouwers MC, "AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II : advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care" 51 : 421-424, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.57 0.815 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼