RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      모호성 회피성향이 보험 수요에 미치는 영향: 보험금 불확실성을 중심으로 = The Effects of Ambiguity Aversion on Insurance Demand: Focusing on Indemnity Uncertainty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105962807

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzes the effect of ambiguity aversion, along with risk aversion, on insurance demand when consumers are exposed to indemnity uncertainty. In particular, we show that an ambiguity aversion does not always decrease insurance demand while a risk aversion decreases insurance demand under indemnity uncertainty. When consumers are risk averse and ambiguity neutral as in the standard models, insurance demand depends on their prudence and the expected value of indemnity uncertainty. Prudent consumers purchase full insurance when the expected value of indemnity uncertainty is less than or equal to zero and the premium is fair, while imprudent ones purchase partial insurance. Partial insurance may also be optimal when the expected value of uncertainty is greater than zero. Given a risk aversion, we derive conditions under which ambiguity-averse consumers purchase more insurance than ambiguity-neutral ones, when indemnity uncertainty changes in terms of the first- and the second-stochastic dominances. The absolute risk aversion, relative risk aversion, absolute prudence and relative prudence would affect an increase in insurance demand under ambiguity aversion. Lastly, given a risk neutral case, insurance demand is not affected by ambiguity aversion. These findings imply that ambiguity aversion is closely linked to risk aversion.
      번역하기

      This study analyzes the effect of ambiguity aversion, along with risk aversion, on insurance demand when consumers are exposed to indemnity uncertainty. In particular, we show that an ambiguity aversion does not always decrease insurance demand while ...

      This study analyzes the effect of ambiguity aversion, along with risk aversion, on insurance demand when consumers are exposed to indemnity uncertainty. In particular, we show that an ambiguity aversion does not always decrease insurance demand while a risk aversion decreases insurance demand under indemnity uncertainty. When consumers are risk averse and ambiguity neutral as in the standard models, insurance demand depends on their prudence and the expected value of indemnity uncertainty. Prudent consumers purchase full insurance when the expected value of indemnity uncertainty is less than or equal to zero and the premium is fair, while imprudent ones purchase partial insurance. Partial insurance may also be optimal when the expected value of uncertainty is greater than zero. Given a risk aversion, we derive conditions under which ambiguity-averse consumers purchase more insurance than ambiguity-neutral ones, when indemnity uncertainty changes in terms of the first- and the second-stochastic dominances. The absolute risk aversion, relative risk aversion, absolute prudence and relative prudence would affect an increase in insurance demand under ambiguity aversion. Lastly, given a risk neutral case, insurance demand is not affected by ambiguity aversion. These findings imply that ambiguity aversion is closely linked to risk aversion.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김광국, "영미보험계약법상의 사기적 청구에 관한 연구" 한국보험학회 62 : 64-93, 2002

      2 이원정, "영국법상 보험금의 지급지체에 대한 보험자의 책임" 한국해법학회 37 (37): 289-322, 2015

      3 홍지민, "보험금의 불확실성과 보험 수요의 재고찰" 한국경영학회 46 (46): 1483-1501, 2017

      4 홍지민, "모호성 회피성향이 예방적 노력에 미치는 영향" 한국파생상품학회 26 (26): 371-389, 2018

      5 홍지민, "모호성 회피가 보험 수요에 미치는 영향" 한국리스크관리학회 29 (29): 25-52, 2018

      6 Lee, K., "Uncertain indemnity and the demand for insurance" 73 (73): 249-265, 2012

      7 Alary, D., "The Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Insurance and Self‐protection" 123 (123): 1188-1202, 2013

      8 Dionne, G., "Self-insurance, self-protection and increased risk aversion" 17 (17): 39-42, 1985

      9 Kimball, M., "Precautionary savings in the small and in the large" 58 : 53-73, 1990

      10 Gollier, C., "Portfolio choices and asset prices: The comparative statics of ambiguity aversion" 78 (78): 1329-1344, 2011

      1 김광국, "영미보험계약법상의 사기적 청구에 관한 연구" 한국보험학회 62 : 64-93, 2002

      2 이원정, "영국법상 보험금의 지급지체에 대한 보험자의 책임" 한국해법학회 37 (37): 289-322, 2015

      3 홍지민, "보험금의 불확실성과 보험 수요의 재고찰" 한국경영학회 46 (46): 1483-1501, 2017

      4 홍지민, "모호성 회피성향이 예방적 노력에 미치는 영향" 한국파생상품학회 26 (26): 371-389, 2018

      5 홍지민, "모호성 회피가 보험 수요에 미치는 영향" 한국리스크관리학회 29 (29): 25-52, 2018

      6 Lee, K., "Uncertain indemnity and the demand for insurance" 73 (73): 249-265, 2012

      7 Alary, D., "The Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Insurance and Self‐protection" 123 (123): 1188-1202, 2013

      8 Dionne, G., "Self-insurance, self-protection and increased risk aversion" 17 (17): 39-42, 1985

      9 Kimball, M., "Precautionary savings in the small and in the large" 58 : 53-73, 1990

      10 Gollier, C., "Portfolio choices and asset prices: The comparative statics of ambiguity aversion" 78 (78): 1329-1344, 2011

      11 Ehrlich, I., "Market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection" 80 (80): 623-648, 1972

      12 Tennyson, S., "Insurance experience and consumers, attitudes toward Insurance fraud" 21 (21): 35-, 2002

      13 Schlesinger, H., "Handbook of insurance" Springer Netherlands 131-151, 2000

      14 Bourgeon, J. M., "Fraudulent claims and nitpicky insurers" 104 (104): 2900-2917, 2014

      15 Picard, P., "Auditing claims in the insurance market with fraud:The credibility issue" 63 (63): 27-56, 1996

      16 Mossin, J., "Aspects of rational insurance purchasing" 553-568, 1968

      17 Snow, A., "Ambiguity aversion and the propensities for self-insurance and self-protection" 42 (42): 27-43, 2011

      18 Klibanoff, P., "A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity" 73 (73): 1849-1892, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.49 0.49 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.62 0.65 1.184 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼