The purpose of this research is to prescribe the effect of motor learning by continuous quantitative KR, continuous qualitative KR, the former quantitative KR and the latter qualitative KR, rests after the former qualitative KR and the latter quantita...
The purpose of this research is to prescribe the effect of motor learning by continuous quantitative KR, continuous qualitative KR, the former quantitative KR and the latter qualitative KR, rests after the former qualitative KR and the latter quantitative KR, cognitive interpolated activity, and motor interpolated activity in the course of practice.Subjects consist of 240 right-handed female freshmen among college students and are assigned twenty persons to each twelve group by means of stratified sampling. Experimentation is linear positioning task.Test results follow:In rest-groups during the Post-KR delay interval, motor learning of following two groups are superior more significantly, which are groups of continous quantitative KR during the exercise course and a group of the former qualitative KR and the latter quantitative KR.During the post-KR delay interval, there is a significant difference in the practice phase between groups in cognitive interpolated activity groups, but no significant difference in the retention phase.In motor interpolated activity the motor learning of the former qualitative KR and the latter quantitative KR group is superior significantly.As a whole, continous quartitative KR during the exercise course, and the rest group after the former qualitative KR and the latter quantitative KR are superior much significantly to other non-interpolated activity group, cognitive interpolated activity group and motor activity group.Besides, cognitive interpolated activity group of continuous quantitative KR during the exercise course and the former qualitative KR and the latter quantitative KR are superior significantly to other cognitive interpolated activity group and motor interploated activity group.