RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Realization of Culture in English Textbooks in Chinese High School Level = Realization of Culture in English Textbooks in Chinese High School Level

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100068913

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study taking a brief look at ELT in China reflects on thepresentation of culture in the English textbooks adopted in Chinese high school level. The categorization by Ramirez and Hall (1990) shaped the basis of the analysis of the textbooks. The main objective of the inquiry was to examine the quality of representation of source, target and other cultures in the ELT textbooks and to investigate the way major and subclasses of cultural elements are treated in the textbooks. Following data collection and analysis, the results of the study pointed out that the Chinese ELT textbooks in high school level represented target culture (C2) more than source culture (C1) and other cultures. Further, among five major cultural elements, the most emphasis was given to the category of religion, arts, and humanities under which came subcategories including literature, arts, music, etc. Accordingly, the coverage of culture in Chinese English textbooks in high school level was characterized to be of an imbalanced status. Put it another way, there were some areas of culture, like personal, which were underrepresented throughout the textbooks. Therefore, relying on the findings of this survey, although some culture dimensions emerged adequate, the present status of culture representation in Chinese ELT textbooks in high school level suffers from its unfair behavior with all culture dimensions, overemphasizing some and poorly characterizing some other; consequently, it is unable to cater for students`` deepening and enriching their knowledge of culture in all respects.
      번역하기

      This study taking a brief look at ELT in China reflects on thepresentation of culture in the English textbooks adopted in Chinese high school level. The categorization by Ramirez and Hall (1990) shaped the basis of the analysis of the textbooks. The m...

      This study taking a brief look at ELT in China reflects on thepresentation of culture in the English textbooks adopted in Chinese high school level. The categorization by Ramirez and Hall (1990) shaped the basis of the analysis of the textbooks. The main objective of the inquiry was to examine the quality of representation of source, target and other cultures in the ELT textbooks and to investigate the way major and subclasses of cultural elements are treated in the textbooks. Following data collection and analysis, the results of the study pointed out that the Chinese ELT textbooks in high school level represented target culture (C2) more than source culture (C1) and other cultures. Further, among five major cultural elements, the most emphasis was given to the category of religion, arts, and humanities under which came subcategories including literature, arts, music, etc. Accordingly, the coverage of culture in Chinese English textbooks in high school level was characterized to be of an imbalanced status. Put it another way, there were some areas of culture, like personal, which were underrepresented throughout the textbooks. Therefore, relying on the findings of this survey, although some culture dimensions emerged adequate, the present status of culture representation in Chinese ELT textbooks in high school level suffers from its unfair behavior with all culture dimensions, overemphasizing some and poorly characterizing some other; consequently, it is unable to cater for students`` deepening and enriching their knowledge of culture in all respects.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼