RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      우크라이나에 대한 푸틴의 전략적 평가 오류 = Putin’s Strategic Miscalculation in Ukraine War

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108663588

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Putin has used the intelligence community to effectively control his political opponents at home and abroad. The propensity to actively utilize espionage and information collection means so far has been shown to maximize them by combining traditional means and modem digital means in the cyber age. Indeed, even before Putin’s near-disastrous miscalculation regarding the invasion of Ukraine, it confirmed the long-held truth that a monopoly on information can wield great power. But Putin’s assurances about the assumption of strategic intelligence early in the invasion of Ukraine appear to have revealed many problems.
      Problems with Putin’s intelligence in the war in Ukraine include: First, Putin’s approach to using information as a political means has resulted in a fundamental error. In other words, Putin focused on using information as a means of punishing dissenting forces or punishing political opponents, which resulted in a failure to properly read the international situation surrounding Russia. Putin made several attempts to break away from the former Soviet politicians, but his use of intelligence was in many ways similar to the way Soviet leaders focused on the problems of the Communist Party rather than external adversaries.
      Second, although Ukraine’s intelligence failure ultimately falls to Putin as the coordinator of the intelligence system, it also casts doubt on the agency’s ability to provide a dispassionate strategic assessment to political leaders. Putin has increasingly isolated himself, offsetting the flow of information and challenging analysis. It has resulted in self-destruction. This dynamic is related to the leader’s perception of threat in authoritarian regimes, and dictators generally link their own survival to the regime’s survival without any form of retirement or succession plans. Ultimately, the intelligence limitations of the dictatorship were revealed early in the war in Ukraine.
      번역하기

      Putin has used the intelligence community to effectively control his political opponents at home and abroad. The propensity to actively utilize espionage and information collection means so far has been shown to maximize them by combining traditional ...

      Putin has used the intelligence community to effectively control his political opponents at home and abroad. The propensity to actively utilize espionage and information collection means so far has been shown to maximize them by combining traditional means and modem digital means in the cyber age. Indeed, even before Putin’s near-disastrous miscalculation regarding the invasion of Ukraine, it confirmed the long-held truth that a monopoly on information can wield great power. But Putin’s assurances about the assumption of strategic intelligence early in the invasion of Ukraine appear to have revealed many problems.
      Problems with Putin’s intelligence in the war in Ukraine include: First, Putin’s approach to using information as a political means has resulted in a fundamental error. In other words, Putin focused on using information as a means of punishing dissenting forces or punishing political opponents, which resulted in a failure to properly read the international situation surrounding Russia. Putin made several attempts to break away from the former Soviet politicians, but his use of intelligence was in many ways similar to the way Soviet leaders focused on the problems of the Communist Party rather than external adversaries.
      Second, although Ukraine’s intelligence failure ultimately falls to Putin as the coordinator of the intelligence system, it also casts doubt on the agency’s ability to provide a dispassionate strategic assessment to political leaders. Putin has increasingly isolated himself, offsetting the flow of information and challenging analysis. It has resulted in self-destruction. This dynamic is related to the leader’s perception of threat in authoritarian regimes, and dictators generally link their own survival to the regime’s survival without any form of retirement or succession plans. Ultimately, the intelligence limitations of the dictatorship were revealed early in the war in Ukraine.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼