RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      북한 경제정책의 변화 전망  :  1960~70년대 동유럽 경제개혁의 시사점을 바탕으로 = The Changes of the North Korean Economic Policies and the Role of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45031475

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We study economic reforms of Eastern European countries in the 1960s and 1970s in order to understand the fundamental nature of new economic measures North Korea has introduced since July 2002 and to draw implications for future direction of North Kor...

      We study economic reforms of Eastern European countries in the 1960s and 1970s in order to understand the fundamental nature of new economic measures North Korea has introduced since July 2002 and to draw implications for future direction of North Korean economic policies.
      Although they show differences in backgrounds, specific policies, and processes of reform, we can also find several similarities. First, economic difficulties played a major role for enforcing economic reform. Second, all the Eastern European countries tries to enhance efficiencies in price, wage and incentive, and economic management systems. Third, the purpose of reform was to improve efficiencies within the planned economic system, but not to reform the economic system itself.
      The implications of economic reforms of Eastern European countries for North Korea can be summarized as follows. First, economic growth does not necessarily accelerate economic reform. Second, it is almost impossible to retreat market mechanism totally once it is introduced. Third, economic reform tends to have ups and downs, thus it is not easy to promote reform measures continuously. Fourth, expansion of market mechanism does not necessarily lead to smooth transformation towards market economic system, and there exists an extreme case such as collapse.
      Like Eastern European counties in the 1960s and 1970s, North Korea is analyzed to try to overcome economic difficulties and normalize official sector by decentralization in decision making and improving economic management system. Compared with Eastern European counties, however, North Korea has an additional task, which is attraction of foreign capital.
      At the present stage, how much foreign capital North Korea is able to induce depends on the settlement of its nuclear development program. However, North Korean economic policy is expected to develop a tendency to intensification of decentralized planned economic system. If North Korean nuclear development issue lasts long, North Korea has to focus on mobilizing domestic capital and it will encourage decentralization process. On the other hand, activation of massive economic assistance program of international society as a result of resolution of North Korean nuclear development issue is going to expedite decentralization of the North Korean economy.
      Therefore, we propose that inter-Korean economic cooperation should perform the following roles. First, inter-Korean economic cooperation should be able to help North Korea attract foreign capital by contributing to settlement of nuclear development issue. Second, it should be able to contribute to increase in ability of the North Korean authority economic management. Third, it should be able to contribute to stabilize and expand market mechanism in North Korea.
      This implies that we need to make a strategic use of inter-Korean economic cooperation in order to accelerate economic changes of North Korea.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 북한경제의 현황 평가
      • Ⅲ. 동유럽 국가 경제개혁의 시사점
      • Ⅳ. 북한 경제정책 변화의 전망
      • Ⅴ. 결론: 남북경협의 역할과 추진원칙
      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 북한경제의 현황 평가
      • Ⅲ. 동유럽 국가 경제개혁의 시사점
      • Ⅳ. 북한 경제정책 변화의 전망
      • Ⅴ. 결론: 남북경협의 역할과 추진원칙
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼