RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103687086

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as response markers in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In 20 patients with breast cancer, DCE-MRI and DWI using a 3 T scanner and PET/CT were performed before and after NAC. DCE-MRI was analyzed using an automatic computer-aided detection program (MRCAD).
      The response imaging parameters were compared with the pathologic response. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for DCE-MRI using MR-CAD analysis, DWI and PET/CT were 0.77, 0.59 and 0.76, respectively. The combination of all parameters measured by MRCAD showed the highest diagnostic performance and accuracy (AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 90%). The combined use of the parameters of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI showed a trend toward improved specificity and negative predictive value (100%, 100%, accuracy = 87.5%). The use of DCE-MRI using MR-CAD parameters indicated better diagnostic performance in predicting the final pathological response compared with DWI and PET/CT, although no statistically significant difference was observed. The combined use of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI may improve the specificity for predicting a pathological response.
      번역하기

      This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as respo...

      This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as response markers in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In 20 patients with breast cancer, DCE-MRI and DWI using a 3 T scanner and PET/CT were performed before and after NAC. DCE-MRI was analyzed using an automatic computer-aided detection program (MRCAD).
      The response imaging parameters were compared with the pathologic response. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for DCE-MRI using MR-CAD analysis, DWI and PET/CT were 0.77, 0.59 and 0.76, respectively. The combination of all parameters measured by MRCAD showed the highest diagnostic performance and accuracy (AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 90%). The combined use of the parameters of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI showed a trend toward improved specificity and negative predictive value (100%, 100%, accuracy = 87.5%). The use of DCE-MRI using MR-CAD parameters indicated better diagnostic performance in predicting the final pathological response compared with DWI and PET/CT, although no statistically significant difference was observed. The combined use of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI may improve the specificity for predicting a pathological response.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lobbes MB, "The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy : a systematic review" 4 : 163-175, 2013

      2 Choi JH, "The role of PET CT to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer : comparison with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging" 102 : 392-397, 2010

      3 Park JS, "The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy : comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography" 52 : 21-28, 2011

      4 Shin HJ, "Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and MRS" 25 : 1349-1359, 2012

      5 Gonzalez-Angulo AM, "Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer" 608 : 1-22, 2007

      6 Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)" 45 : 228-247, 2009

      7 Mauri D, "Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer : a meta-analysis" 97 : 188-194, 2005

      8 Tateishi U, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer : prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment" 263 : 53-63, 2012

      9 Kong X, "Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients" 47 : 2084-2090, 2011

      10 Symmans WF, "Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy" 25 : 4414-4422, 2007

      1 Lobbes MB, "The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy : a systematic review" 4 : 163-175, 2013

      2 Choi JH, "The role of PET CT to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer : comparison with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging" 102 : 392-397, 2010

      3 Park JS, "The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy : comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography" 52 : 21-28, 2011

      4 Shin HJ, "Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and MRS" 25 : 1349-1359, 2012

      5 Gonzalez-Angulo AM, "Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer" 608 : 1-22, 2007

      6 Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)" 45 : 228-247, 2009

      7 Mauri D, "Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer : a meta-analysis" 97 : 188-194, 2005

      8 Tateishi U, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer : prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment" 263 : 53-63, 2012

      9 Kong X, "Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients" 47 : 2084-2090, 2011

      10 Symmans WF, "Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy" 25 : 4414-4422, 2007

      11 Van Goethem M, "MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component" 62 : 273-282, 2007

      12 Hylton NM, "Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL" 263 : 663-672, 2012

      13 Wahl RL, "From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors" 50 : 122s-150s, 2009

      14 Drew PJ, "Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer" 6 : 599-603, 1999

      15 Park SH, "Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer" 22 : 18-25, 2012

      16 Wu LM, "Can diffusion-weighted MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR imaging precisely evaluate and predict pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer?" 135 : 17-28, 2012

      17 Dose-Schwarz J, "Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET : conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer" 102 : 35-41, 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼