Reading Fluency vs. Oral Language Comprehension in Predicting Reading Comprehension of Korean EFL Learners

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explored the applicability of the simple view of reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986) for high school Korean EFL learners. The simple view of reading highlights language comprehension abilities and decoding skills as the two major components that explain reading comprehension. However, considering that most older L2 readers, such as Korean high school EFL learners, presumably have good command of word-level decoding skills, a slightly modified version of the simple view of reading was investigated in the current study. That is, in lieu of word recognition abilities, reading fluency that measured readers’ ability to decode and comprehend rapidly and simultaneously at the sentence level was considered. In addition, the relative importance of the two major constructs in explaining reading comprehension was explored. 101 Korean EFL learners in their first year of high school served as participants in this study, and the findings demonstrated that the modified simple view of reading was supported, as both reading fluency and language comprehension abilities turned out to be significant contributors to reading comprehension. However, the results from structural equation modeling showed that oral language comprehension abilities had much stronger influence on reading comprehension abilities, compared to reading fluency. These findings provide important pedagogical implications for building Korean EFL learners’ general oral language comprehension abilities in promoting successful reading comprehension in English.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Woodcock, R, "Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery" The Riverside Publishing Company 2004

2 Woodcock,R, "Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised" NCS Pearson 1998

3 Royer, J. M, "Transfer of comprehension skills from native to second language" 34 : 450-455, 1991

4 Savage,R, "The ‘simple view’ of reading: Some evidence and possible implications" 17 : 17-33, 2001

5 Hoover, W. A, "The simple view of reading" 2 : 127-160, 1990

6 Johnston, T. C., "The contribution of naming speed the simple view of reading" 19 : 339-361, 2006

7 Joshi, R, "The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex" 21 : 85-97, 2000

8 Perfetti, C. A., "The acquisition of reading comprehension skill In The science of reading: A handbook" Basil Blackwell 227-247, 2005

9 Moats,L.C, "Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers" Paul H. Brookes 2000

10 Gough, P. B., "Some observations on a simple view of reading In Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention" Erlbaum 1-14, 1996

11 Adlof, S. M., "Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component" 19 : 933-958, 2006

12 Savage,R, "Reading comprehension is not always the product of decoding and listening comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are very poor readers" 10 : 143-164, 2006

13 Adler,C.R, "Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read" Partnership for Reading, National Institute for Literacy, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 2001

14 Snow, C. E., "Preventing reading difficulties in young children" National Academy Press 1998

15 Cutting, L. E., "Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured" 10 : 277-299, 2006

16 Chen, R. S, "Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading" 29 : 1-24, 1997

17 강유선, "Prediction of Korean EFL Learners’ English Reading Comprehension Abilities: An Examination of the Simple View of Reading" 한국영어교육학회 66 (66): 23-38, 2011

18 Carver,R.P, "Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading" 10 : 121-154, 1997

19 Dunn, L. M., "Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III" American Guidance Service 1997

20 Fuchs, L. S., "Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis" 5 : 239-256, 2001

21 Proctor, C. P, "Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension" 97 : 246-256, 2005

22 Droop, M., "Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners" 38 : 78-103, 2003

23 Høien-Tengesdal,I, "Is the Simple View of Reading too simple" 54 : 451-469, 2010

24 Mancilla-Martinez, J, "Investigating English reading comprehension growth in adolescent language minority learners: Some insights from the simple view" 24 : 339-354, 2011

25 Hoffman,J.V, "In search of the “simple view” of reading comprehension In Handbook of research on reading eomprehension" Routledge 54-66, 2009

26 Wolf,M, "Dyslexia, fluency, & the brain" York Press 2001

27 Catts, H. W, "Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities In Connections between language and reading disabilities" Erlbaum 25-40, 2005

28 Gough, P. B., "Decoding, reading, and reading disability" 7 : 6-10, 1986

29 Hu, L., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 : 1-55, 1999

30 Kintsch, W, "Comprehension In Children’s reading comprehension and assessment" Lawrence Erlbaum 71-92, 2005

31 Vellutino, F. R., "Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development" 11 : 3-32, 2007

32 Kirby, J. R, "Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading" 42 : 75-82, 2008

33 Conners,F.A, "Attentional control and the simple view of reading" 22 : 591-613, 2009

34 Gottardo, A., "Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade" 1 : 330-344, 2009

35 Nakamoto, J, "A cross-linguistic investigation of English language learners’ reading comprehension in English and Spanish" 12 : 351-371, 2008