RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 지식구조 변화 연구 :비즈니스 모델 연구를 중심으로 = A Study on the Change of Knowledge Structure through Keyword Network Analysis : Focus on Business Model Research

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105429599

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The business models has a great impact on the successful management of enterprises. Business environment has been shifting from industrial economy to knowledge-based economy. Enterprises go through numerous trials for successful management in the chan...

      The business models has a great impact on the successful management of enterprises. Business environment has been shifting from industrial economy to knowledge-based economy. Enterprises go through numerous trials for successful management in the changing environment. Along with trial tests, research areas have been growing simultaneously. Although many researches have been conducted with regard to business models, it is very insufficient to systematically analyze the knowledge flow of research. Accordingly, successive researchers who want to study the business model may find it difficult to establish the orientation of future application research based on understanding the process of changing the knowledge structure that have accumulated so far. This study is intended to determine the current state of the business model research and to understand the process of knowledge structure changes in keywords that appear in 2,667 business model articles in the SCOPUS database. Identifying the knowledge structure has been completed through social network analysis, a methodology based on the ‘relationship', and the changes in the knowledge structure were identified by classifying them into four different periods. The analysis showed that, first, the number of business model co-author increases over time with the need for academic diversity. Second, the ‘innovation' keyword has the biggest center in the network, and over time, the lower-rank keyword which was in the former period has emerged as the top-rank keyword. Third, the cohesiveness group decreased from 12 before 2000 to 5 in 2015 and also the modularity decreased as well. Finally, examining characteristics of study area through a cognitive map showed that the relationships between domains increased gradually over time. The study has provided a systematic basis for understanding the current state of the business model research and the process of changing knowledge structure. In addition, considering that no research has ever systematically analyzed the knowledge structure accumulated by individual researches, it is considered as a significant study.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고문정, "온라인 플랫폼에서의 다중 채널 네트워크(MCN) 비즈니스 모델 탐색" 정보통신정책학회 23 (23): 59-94, 2016

      2 Hu, C., "Visual representation of knowledge networks : A social network analysis of hospitality research domain" 27 (27): 302-312, 2008

      3 Baibak, D. C., "Using arena to teach management concepts by creating business models" 31 (31): 339-342, 1996

      4 Zott, C., "The business model : A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis" 11 (11): 403-411, 2013

      5 Lohmann, G., "The airline business model spectrum" 31 : 7-9, 2013

      6 Strange, S., "States and markets" Bloomsbury Publishing 2015

      7 Zhang, H., "Social shopping communities as an emerging business model of youth entrepreneurship : Exploring the effects of website characteristics" 66 (66): 319-345, 2015

      8 Mitchell, J.C., "Social networks in urban situations : analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns" Manchester University Press 1969

      9 Scott, J., "Social Network Analysis : A Handbook"

      10 Hu, J., "Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis" 51 (51): 329-339, 2015

      1 고문정, "온라인 플랫폼에서의 다중 채널 네트워크(MCN) 비즈니스 모델 탐색" 정보통신정책학회 23 (23): 59-94, 2016

      2 Hu, C., "Visual representation of knowledge networks : A social network analysis of hospitality research domain" 27 (27): 302-312, 2008

      3 Baibak, D. C., "Using arena to teach management concepts by creating business models" 31 (31): 339-342, 1996

      4 Zott, C., "The business model : A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis" 11 (11): 403-411, 2013

      5 Lohmann, G., "The airline business model spectrum" 31 : 7-9, 2013

      6 Strange, S., "States and markets" Bloomsbury Publishing 2015

      7 Zhang, H., "Social shopping communities as an emerging business model of youth entrepreneurship : Exploring the effects of website characteristics" 66 (66): 319-345, 2015

      8 Mitchell, J.C., "Social networks in urban situations : analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns" Manchester University Press 1969

      9 Scott, J., "Social Network Analysis : A Handbook"

      10 Hu, J., "Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis" 51 (51): 329-339, 2015

      11 Salvato, G., "Presentation and exchange of business models with CIMOSA-XML" 40 (40): 125-139, 1999

      12 Paulose, H., "Open Innovation in Emerging Markets : A Business Model Perspective" 21 (21): 1-12, 2015

      13 Eveland Jr, W. P., "Moving beyond"just the facts"the influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge" 31 (31): 82-108, 2004

      14 Law, J., "Mapping acidification research : A test of the co-word method" 23 (23): 417-461, 1992

      15 Velu, C., "Managing decision-making and cannibalization for parallel business models" 46 (46): 443-458, 2013

      16 Newman, M.E., "Finding and evaluating community structure in networks" 69 (69): 026113-, 2004

      17 Ye, Q., "Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research" 2 : 55-64, 2012

      18 Mutschke, P., "Collaboration and cognitive structures in social science research fields, Towards socio-cognitive analysis in information systems" 52 (52): 487-502, 2001

      19 Freeman, L.C., "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification" 1 (1): 215-239, 1979

      20 Teece, D.J., "Business models, business strategy and innovation" 43 (43): 172-194, 2010

      21 Forge, S., "Business models for the computer industry for the next decade. When will the fastest eat the largest?" 25 (25): 923-948, 1993

      22 Timmers, P., "Business models for electronic markets" 8 (8): 3-8, 1998

      23 Güvenen, O., "Business models for electronic markets"

      24 Wirtz, B. W., "Business models : Origin, development and future research perspectives" 49 (49): 36-54, 2016

      25 Velu, C., "Business model innovation and thirdparty alliance on the survival of new firms" 35 : 1-11, 2015

      26 Osterwalder, A., "Business model generation : a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers" John Wiley &Sons 2010

      27 Sakata, I., "Bibliometric analysis of service innovation research : Identifying knowledge domain and global network of knowledge" 80 (80): 1085-1093, 2013

      28 Choi, J., "Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution" 48 (48): 371-381, 2011

      29 Heinz, S., "Air transport in Africa : Toward sustainable business models for African airlines" 31 : 72-83, 2013

      30 Zhang, Q. -R., "A dynamic co-word networkrelated approach on the evolution of China’s urbanization research" 111 (111): 1623-1642, 2017

      31 Zhu, W., "A bibliometric study of service innovation research : based on complex network analysis" 94 (94): 1195-1216, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-05-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Society of IT Services -> Journal of Information Technology Services KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-08-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국SI학회지 -> 한국IT서비스학회지
      외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Society of System Integration -> Journal of the Korea Society of IT Services
      KCI등재후보
      2006-08-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국SI학회 -> 한국IT서비스학회
      영문명 : Korea Society Of System Integration -> Korea Society Of IT Services
      KCI등재후보
      2006-06-21 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국SI학회 -> 한국IT서비스학회
      영문명 : Korea Society Of System Integration -> Korea Society Of IT Services
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.49 0.49 0.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.47 0.627 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼