RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Gower as a Sophisticated Storyteller: Narrative Qualities and Readership

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100837760

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Gower’s ideas about story and storytelling do not deviate from those of
    the Medieval artful writers like Chaucer in that a story is fiction and that
    the key to a meaning lies in a reader’s hand. Gower in the Confessio
    Amantis shows ambiguity, complexity, and the relativity of all meaning
    through the technique of irony, and he creates the dialogic discourse
    between the characters, even including himself and the audience. In his
    work, meaning or what might be seen as authorial intention is not given
    directly by the author, but it should be ferreted out by the reader’s
    intellect and agility. In this regard, Gower, although treating of ethics and
    with the ethical purpose of his poem strongly in his mind, was a poet, not
    a moral philosopher.
    Gower as a sophisticated poet and ironist allows his unreliable
    tale-narrator, Genius, to twist his tale-telling materials for his own comic
    purpose and to produce the gap between what is said and what is meant.
    It is through the ironic voice of Genius that Gower makes the reader and
    himself free from a seemingly authorial position that Genius assumes and
    from heavy obligation of moral pronouncement as an author respectively.
    Eventually, the truth among the fictions or lies depends solely on the
    audience’s capacity to penetrate Genius’ rhetorical nonsense. In addition to
    a tour de force of sustained humor and audience engagement through his
    narrative devices,Gower’s psychological treatment of Amans in Books III
    and IV enables us to label him as a sophisticated storyteller.
    번역하기

    Gower’s ideas about story and storytelling do not deviate from those of the Medieval artful writers like Chaucer in that a story is fiction and that the key to a meaning lies in a reader’s hand. Gower in the Confessio Amantis shows ambiguity, c...

    Gower’s ideas about story and storytelling do not deviate from those of
    the Medieval artful writers like Chaucer in that a story is fiction and that
    the key to a meaning lies in a reader’s hand. Gower in the Confessio
    Amantis shows ambiguity, complexity, and the relativity of all meaning
    through the technique of irony, and he creates the dialogic discourse
    between the characters, even including himself and the audience. In his
    work, meaning or what might be seen as authorial intention is not given
    directly by the author, but it should be ferreted out by the reader’s
    intellect and agility. In this regard, Gower, although treating of ethics and
    with the ethical purpose of his poem strongly in his mind, was a poet, not
    a moral philosopher.
    Gower as a sophisticated poet and ironist allows his unreliable
    tale-narrator, Genius, to twist his tale-telling materials for his own comic
    purpose and to produce the gap between what is said and what is meant.
    It is through the ironic voice of Genius that Gower makes the reader and
    himself free from a seemingly authorial position that Genius assumes and
    from heavy obligation of moral pronouncement as an author respectively.
    Eventually, the truth among the fictions or lies depends solely on the
    audience’s capacity to penetrate Genius’ rhetorical nonsense. In addition to
    a tour de force of sustained humor and audience engagement through his
    narrative devices,Gower’s psychological treatment of Amans in Books III
    and IV enables us to label him as a sophisticated storyteller.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. Ambiguity and Complexity of Narrative Voices
    • II. Narrator’s Inconsistency and Unreliability
    • III. Irony and Humor
    • IV. Character
    • Works Cited
    • I. Ambiguity and Complexity of Narrative Voices
    • II. Narrator’s Inconsistency and Unreliability
    • III. Irony and Humor
    • IV. Character
    • Works Cited
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼