미국과 유럽의 사례를 통해 본 증오범죄 통계법안(2016년 이종걸 의원안) 고찰 = A Comparative Review on the ‘Hate Crime Statistics Bill of 2016’

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Hate crimes are difficult to ignore in that they not only lead to negative physical/mental effects on respective victims but also have a comprehensive negative impact on such a population group with the same characteristics. In this context, the review of this study on the ‘Hate Crime Statistics Bill,’ which was proposed by the National Assembly in 2016 and eventually withdrawn, is meaningful. Main findings, which are based on a comparison with both American and European approaches, include that the bill improperly define the concept of the motiveless crime, sets no limit on its behavior modality, and omits the specific range of individual victim’s traits that are subject to protection. That is, there is some room for doubt whether the bill is in line with the global standards. In addition to describing additional, several problems concerning the 2016 bill, suggestions responding to each problem are discussed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 홍성수, "혐오(hate)에 어떻게 대응할 것인가? - 혐오에 관한 법과 정책 -" 법학연구소 30 (30): 191-228, 2019

2 김진혁, "한국형 증오범죄에 관한 연구" 한국범죄심리학회 6 (6): 31-57, 2010

3 조계원, "한국에서 증오범죄의 가능성과 규제 방안" 법과사회이론학회 (55) : 65-97, 2017

4 이인호, "한국 言論自由의 헌법적 위상에 대한 진단" (사)한국언론법학회 14 (14): 1-47, 2015

5 심경수, "증오언론(Hate Speech)과 십자가 소각(Cross Burning)에 관한 판례경향 - R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul 및 Virginia v. Black 사건을 중심으로 -" 미국헌법학회 18 (18): 39-80, 2007

6 김태은, "증오범죄의 형사정책적 대응방안에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 22 (22): 557-584, 2015

7 김중곤, "증오범죄에 대한 형사 정책적 대응- 주요쟁점 및 선결과제 -" 경찰대학 18 (18): 193-222, 2018

8 "증오범죄 통계법안(2016, 의안번호 4328)"

9 김수원, "사회적 차별, 혐오범죄(Hate Crime) 그리고 인권" 법학연구소 25 (25): 261-296, 2009

10 최철영, "미국연방헌법의 표현의 자유와 일본의 증오언설 - 일본의 증오언설에 대한 국제형사법 적용가능성 -" 미국헌법학회 26 (26): 299-325, 2015

11 조철옥, "미국과 한국의 증오범죄에 관한 비교 고찰" 경찰대학 12 (12): 37-76, 2012

12 윤정숙, "묻지마 범죄자의 특성 이해 및 대응방안 연구" 형사정책연구원 2014

13 강소영, "묻지마 범죄의 개념화에 관한 연구" 치안정책연구소 2013

14 임지봉, "[미국헌법판례열람] 명백·현존하는 위험 원칙의 현대화"

15 "What We Investigate - Hate Crimes"

16 "Utahpolicy.com"

17 Lawrence, F. M., "The punishment of hate : Toward a normative theory of bias-motivated crimes" 93 (93): 320-381, 1994

18 Phillips, N. D., "The prosecution of hate crime typology" 24 (24): 883-905, 2009

19 Pezzella, F. S., "The likelihood of injury among bias crimes : An analysis of general and specific bias types" 32 (32): 703-729, 2017

20 "State Equality Index 2019"

21 "Oregon Department of Justice"

22 ODIHR, "ODIHR’s Efforts to Counter Hate Crime" Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2016

23 FRA, "Making hate crime visible in the European Union: acknowledging victims' rights" Publications Office of the European Union 7-, 2012

24 Thomas, Rebecca, "Legislative Provisions for Hate Crime across EU Member States"

25 "Laws and Policies"

26 Barbara A. Perry, "In the Name of Hate: Understanding Hate Crimes" Routledge 2001

27 Levin, J., "Hate crimes: The rising tide of bigotry and bloodshed" Westview 1993

28 Jacobs, J. B., "Hate crimes: Criminal law & identity politics" Oxford University Press 1998

29 Iganski, P., "Hate crimes hurt more" 45 (45): 626-638, 2001

30 McDevitt, J., "Hate crime offenders : An expanded typology" 58 (58): 303-317, 2002

31 Gerstenfeld, Phyllis B., "Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls, and Controversies" SAGE Publications 79-83, 2013

32 "Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2017/18.: 28-29"

33 ODIHR, "Hate Crime Laws: A Practical Guide" OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights 2009

34 Michael Bronski, "Hate Crime Laws Don’t Prevent Violence Against LGBT People: So why do many LGBT people, and others, feel so deeply about the need to have them?"

35 "Factsheet – Hate speech"

36 "2019 Hate Crime Statistics"