IN McMechen v. McMechen, 17 W. Va. 683, it is held that the burden of proof of the sanity of a testator is on the proponents of a will, but not so of absen...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O131537198
1882년
eng
학술저널
PHP / Reports / Feature
384 [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
IN McMechen v. McMechen, 17 W. Va. 683, it is held that the burden of proof of the sanity of a testator is on the proponents of a will, but not so of absen...
IN McMechen v. McMechen, 17 W. Va. 683, it is held that the burden of proof of the sanity of a testator is on the proponents of a will, but not so of absence of fraud or undue influence. The court said: "At common law a man could not make a will. But by the English statute, 32 Hen. VIII, persons might dispose of their property by will. There was nothing in this statute to change the rule of the common law as to the legal presumption that a man is of sound mind, until the contrary appears.
VALIDITY OF VERBAL CONTRACT FOR SALE OF GOODS.
RULES RELATING TO OPINION EVIDENCE.