RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Research on the Structural Change of Aesthetic Theory from Social Sciences to Natural Sciences

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106490769

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper analysis the aesthetic theory structure based on the knowledge framework of different disciplines, and there is a summary of the structural change of aesthetic theory. By far, there are different explanations on the aesthetics concept in the studies.
      In social sciences, the aesthetics concept is greatly related to the philosophical thinking of some basic problems of aesthetics. The basic problems are explained with the basic principles of philosophy, and the phenomenon of aesthetic, the form of beauty and the method principle of beauty are discussed form the prospect of psychology. While in natural sciences, the concept is analyzed with aesthetic evolution, aesthetic experience and aesthetic principle from the prospect of biology or neuroscience. And the current aesthetical studies are most dependent on the principles of cognitive science. Under the background of such study background and theory development, there is a conclusive study of the aesthetic theory structure based on the knowledge framework of different disciplines.
      The study purpose of this paper is to have an organization and conclusion of the aesthetic theory development for a more structured understanding of aesthetic concepts. The study method is the methods of literature investigation and theoretical analysis.
      There is an analysis of the main historical figures related to aesthetic theory and works to sort and conclude the main features of relevant theories. This study scope is the aesthetics concept in different disciplines, structural change factor of the aesthetics development concept, so as to sort and analyze the theoretical basis of aesthetics in different disciplines. In this study, there is mainly organizing on the aesthetic theory in social science and natural science, and there is the conclusion of the aesthetics development in social science, natural science and the impact of cognitive science on aesthetics development in the future. Then, there is an analysis of the structural change in the aesthetic theory. There is a summary of the structure and features of aesthetic theory and the diversified development trend of theoretical structure. The following of aesthetics in different disciplinary theory structures are concluded, including study methods, study ranges, differences of study objects. Finally, the features of the aesthetic theory structure in social science, natural science, and cognitive science are concluded. This study can help people better understand the concept of aesthetic theory and provide a structural framework for aesthetic theory development.
      번역하기

      This paper analysis the aesthetic theory structure based on the knowledge framework of different disciplines, and there is a summary of the structural change of aesthetic theory. By far, there are different explanations on the aesthetics concept in th...

      This paper analysis the aesthetic theory structure based on the knowledge framework of different disciplines, and there is a summary of the structural change of aesthetic theory. By far, there are different explanations on the aesthetics concept in the studies.
      In social sciences, the aesthetics concept is greatly related to the philosophical thinking of some basic problems of aesthetics. The basic problems are explained with the basic principles of philosophy, and the phenomenon of aesthetic, the form of beauty and the method principle of beauty are discussed form the prospect of psychology. While in natural sciences, the concept is analyzed with aesthetic evolution, aesthetic experience and aesthetic principle from the prospect of biology or neuroscience. And the current aesthetical studies are most dependent on the principles of cognitive science. Under the background of such study background and theory development, there is a conclusive study of the aesthetic theory structure based on the knowledge framework of different disciplines.
      The study purpose of this paper is to have an organization and conclusion of the aesthetic theory development for a more structured understanding of aesthetic concepts. The study method is the methods of literature investigation and theoretical analysis.
      There is an analysis of the main historical figures related to aesthetic theory and works to sort and conclude the main features of relevant theories. This study scope is the aesthetics concept in different disciplines, structural change factor of the aesthetics development concept, so as to sort and analyze the theoretical basis of aesthetics in different disciplines. In this study, there is mainly organizing on the aesthetic theory in social science and natural science, and there is the conclusion of the aesthetics development in social science, natural science and the impact of cognitive science on aesthetics development in the future. Then, there is an analysis of the structural change in the aesthetic theory. There is a summary of the structure and features of aesthetic theory and the diversified development trend of theoretical structure. The following of aesthetics in different disciplinary theory structures are concluded, including study methods, study ranges, differences of study objects. Finally, the features of the aesthetic theory structure in social science, natural science, and cognitive science are concluded. This study can help people better understand the concept of aesthetic theory and provide a structural framework for aesthetic theory development.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Weitz M., "The Role of Theory in Aesthetics" 15 (15): 1956

      2 Carter R., "The Human Brain Book: An Illustrated Guide to its Structure, Function, and Disorders" Dorling Kindersley Publishing 2014

      3 Malone J, "Psychology: Pythagoras to Present" MIT Press 2011

      4 Murphy T. M., "Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia" Oxford University Press 2004

      5 Gerson L. P., "Platonic Dualism" 69 (69): 1986

      6 Plato, "Plato: Complete Works" Hackett Publishing Co 1997

      7 Gotthelf A., "Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology" Cambridge University Press 2009

      8 Onians J., "Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki" Yale University Press 2008

      9 Skov M., "Neuroaesthetics: Foundations and Frontiers in Aesthetics" Routledge 2017

      10 Chatterjee A., "Neuroaesthetics : A Coming of Age Story" 23 (23): 2011

      1 Weitz M., "The Role of Theory in Aesthetics" 15 (15): 1956

      2 Carter R., "The Human Brain Book: An Illustrated Guide to its Structure, Function, and Disorders" Dorling Kindersley Publishing 2014

      3 Malone J, "Psychology: Pythagoras to Present" MIT Press 2011

      4 Murphy T. M., "Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia" Oxford University Press 2004

      5 Gerson L. P., "Platonic Dualism" 69 (69): 1986

      6 Plato, "Plato: Complete Works" Hackett Publishing Co 1997

      7 Gotthelf A., "Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology" Cambridge University Press 2009

      8 Onians J., "Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki" Yale University Press 2008

      9 Skov M., "Neuroaesthetics: Foundations and Frontiers in Aesthetics" Routledge 2017

      10 Chatterjee A., "Neuroaesthetics : A Coming of Age Story" 23 (23): 2011

      11 Chatterjee A., "Neuroaesthetics" 18 (18): 2014

      12 Leonardo da Vinci, "Leonardo on Painting: An Anthology of Writings by Leonardo da Vinci with a Selection of Documents Relating to His Career" Yale University Press 2001

      13 Winner E., "How Art Works : A Psychological Exploration" Oxford University Press 2018

      14 Dissanayake E., "Homo Aestheticus : Where Art Comes From and Why" University of Washington Press 1995

      15 Wango G., "History and Systems of Psychology : Timelines in the Development of Contemporary Psychology" 5 (5): 2017

      16 Kaminsky J., "Hegel on Art : An Interpretation of Hegel’s Aesthetics" SUNY Press 1970

      17 Frie R., "Fundamentally Embodied : The Experience of Psychological Agency" 44 (44): 2008

      18 Shimamura A., "Experiencing Art : In the Brain of the Beholder" Oxford University Press 2015

      19 Voland E., "Evolutionary Aesthetics" Springer 2003

      20 Baker G., "Descartes’ Dualism" Routledge 2005

      21 Gross C. G., "Aristotle on the Brain" 1 (1): 1995

      22 Moss J., "Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire" Oxford University Press 2012

      23 Lauring J. O., "An Introduction to Neuroaesthetics: The Neuroscientific Approach to Aesthetic Experience, Artistic Creativity and Arts Appreciation" Museum Tusculanum Press 2015

      24 Leonard P. Wessell Jr., "Alexander Baumgarten’s Contribution to the Development of Aesthetics" 30 (30): 1972

      25 Beardsley M. C., "Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present" University Alabama Press 1975

      26 Budd M., "Aesthetics" 39 (39): 1998

      27 Shimamura A. P., "Aesthetic Science:Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experiences" Oxford University Press 2012

      28 Küplen M., "Aesthetic Representation of Purposiveness and the Concept of Beauty in Kant’s Aesthetics. The Solution of the ‘Everything is Beautiful’ Problem" 4 (4): 2016

      29 Kingsbury J., "(R)evolutionary Aesthetics : Denis Dutton’s The Art Instinct : Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution" 26 (26): 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.5 0.732 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼