본 연구는 최근 연구 동향을 반영하여 국내 은행의 무수익여신(NPL) 상승률의 결정요인에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구는 NPL의 상승률에 관한 거시변수 가설과 은행변수 가설을 2단계 실...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105433640
2018
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
3-37(35쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
본 연구는 최근 연구 동향을 반영하여 국내 은행의 무수익여신(NPL) 상승률의 결정요인에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구는 NPL의 상승률에 관한 거시변수 가설과 은행변수 가설을 2단계 실...
본 연구는 최근 연구 동향을 반영하여 국내 은행의 무수익여신(NPL) 상승률의 결정요인에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구는 NPL의 상승률에 관한 거시변수 가설과 은행변수 가설을 2단계 실증절차를 사용하여 순차적으로 분석하였다. 그리고 패널 VAR 모형을 사용하여 NPL의 영향이 실물 경제로 이어지는 전달 효과를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 표본은 2000년부터 2016년까지 164개 일반은행과 저축은행의 반기 관측치이다. 패널 VAR 모형을 바탕으로 직교화된 충격반응함수를 측정한 결과, 은행 시스템에서 발생한 충격이 약 1년 동안 실물 경제에 부정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 개별은행이 NPL을 효과적으로 관리하는 것이 거시경제적으로 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 의미한다. 또한, 물가 경로와 이자율 경로에서 전달 효과가 뚜렷했는데, 이는 통화 정책을 수행할 때 실물 경제의 부담을 경감하기 위해 먼저 은행 시스템을 점검해야 함을 시사한다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper examines the determinants of non-performing loans (hereafter NPLs) in the perspective of the macroeconomic and bank-level variables. Our contributions to the literature are in three folds. First, we employ the fixed effect model controlling...
This paper examines the determinants of non-performing loans (hereafter NPLs) in the perspective of the macroeconomic and bank-level variables. Our contributions to the literature are in three folds. First, we employ the fixed effect model controlling for bank-level heterogeneity and the dynamic panel model controlling for autocorrelation to examine the determinants of NPLs growth in the Korean banking sector. On top of that, we extend the sample to commercial banks and savings banks. Including savings bank is crucial since those banks were distressed during the sample periods. Third, this paper analyzes the feedback effects of the banking sector on the real economy using panel vector autoregressive model.
The results show that, among other macroeconomic factors, ‘growth rate of GDP’, ‘growth rate of KOSPI’, ‘growth rate of HPI’, ‘inflation’, ‘risk-free rate’, ‘corporate sector leverage’, ‘government spending-to-taxes’, ‘non-financial sector credit-to-GDP’, and ‘growth of nominal exchange rate’ support the macroeconomic hypotheses. For the bank-level hypotheses, it was found that 1) ‘non-interest expenses-to-total assets’ and ‘total expenses-to-total income’ satisfy the skimping hypothesis, 2) ‘bank size in log’ satisfies the too-big-to-fail hypothesis, 3) ‘liquid assets-to-total deposits’ satisfy the liquidity hypothesis, and 4) ‘total loans-to-total assets’, ‘total loans-to-total deposits’, and ‘interest income-to-total loans’ satisfy the lending supply hypothesis.
Furthermore, as for the impact of the banking sector on the real economy, a simultaneous negative relationship was found between bank's NPLs and GDP. The causal relationship between the NPLs and GDP, on the other hand, was only found in the inflation and credit channels. According to the impulse response functions estimated, shocks in the banking sector result in negative consequences of the real economy for about one year. This implies that there exists the positive macroeconomic effect if individual banks effectively manage their NPLs.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 구재운, "주거래은행의 재무상태가 기업투자에 미치는 효과" 한국산업경제학회 25 (25): 2147-2168, 2012
2 김상헌, "자기자본비율의 상향조정 유인이 은행의 후순위채 발행에 미치는 영향" 한국경영교육학회 (62) : 1-20, 2010
3 이은서, "은행의 무수익여신 결정요인" 한국경영교육학회 28 (28): 487-507, 2013
4 이석영, "은행산업의 효율성 영향요인 분석" 대한회계학회 17 (17): 249-276, 2012
5 변현수, "국내은행의 부실여신 결정요인과 실물경제에 미치는 영향" (732) : 3-36, 2016
6 Keeton, W.R., "Why do banks' loan losses differ?" 72 (72): 1987
7 Rajan, R. G., "Why bank credit policies fluctuate: A theory and some evidence" 109 (109): 399-441, 1994
8 Choi, I., "Unit root tests for panel data" 20 (20): 249-272, 2001
9 Levin, A., "Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties" 108 (108): 1-24, 2002
10 Stern, G. H., "Too big to fail: The hazards of bank bailouts" Brookings Institution Press 2004
1 구재운, "주거래은행의 재무상태가 기업투자에 미치는 효과" 한국산업경제학회 25 (25): 2147-2168, 2012
2 김상헌, "자기자본비율의 상향조정 유인이 은행의 후순위채 발행에 미치는 영향" 한국경영교육학회 (62) : 1-20, 2010
3 이은서, "은행의 무수익여신 결정요인" 한국경영교육학회 28 (28): 487-507, 2013
4 이석영, "은행산업의 효율성 영향요인 분석" 대한회계학회 17 (17): 249-276, 2012
5 변현수, "국내은행의 부실여신 결정요인과 실물경제에 미치는 영향" (732) : 3-36, 2016
6 Keeton, W.R., "Why do banks' loan losses differ?" 72 (72): 1987
7 Rajan, R. G., "Why bank credit policies fluctuate: A theory and some evidence" 109 (109): 399-441, 1994
8 Choi, I., "Unit root tests for panel data" 20 (20): 249-272, 2001
9 Levin, A., "Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties" 108 (108): 1-24, 2002
10 Stern, G. H., "Too big to fail: The hazards of bank bailouts" Brookings Institution Press 2004
11 Festić, M., "The macroeconomic sources of systemic risk in the banking sectors of five new EU member states" 35 (35): 310-322, 2011
12 Geanakoplos, J., "The leverage cycle" 24 (24): 1-66, 2010
13 Sargan, J. D., "The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables" 26 : 393-415, 1958
14 O'Connell, P. G., "The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity" 44 (44): 1-19, 1998
15 Sorge, M., "Stress-testing financial systems: an overview of current methodologies" 2004
16 Martinez Peria, M., "Stress testing of financial systems: an overview of issues, methodologies, and FSAP experiences" 2001
17 Granger, C.W., "Spurious regressions in econometrics" 2 (2): 111-120, 1974
18 Arellano, M., "Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations" 58 (58): 277-297, 1991
19 Berger, A.N., "Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks" 21 (21): 849-870, 1997
20 Espinoza, R.A., "Nonperforming loans in the GCC banking system and their macroeconomic effects" 2010
21 Fofack, H., "Nonperforming loans in Sub-Saharan Africa: causal analysis and macroeconomic implications" 2005
22 Klein, N., "Non-performing loans in CESEE: Determinants and impact on macroeconomic performance" 2013
23 Rajan, R., "Non-performing loans and terms of credit of public sector banks in India: An empirical assessment" 24 (24): 81-121, 2003
24 Bholat, D. M., "Non-performing loans : regulatory and accounting treatments of assets" 2016
25 Louzis, D. P., "Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios" 36 (36): 1012-1027, 2012
26 Hansen, L. P., "Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators" 50 (50): 1029-1054, 1982
27 Beck, R., "Key determinants of non-performing loans : new evidence from a global sample" 26 (26): 525-550, 2015
28 Marcucci, J., "Is Bank Portfolio Riskiness Procyclical?: Evidence from Italy Using a Vector Autoregression" 18 (18): 46-63, 2008
29 Granger, C. W., "Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods" 37 (37): 424-438, 1969
30 Blundell, R., "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models" 87 (87): 115-143, 1998
31 Roodman, D., "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata" 2006
32 Reinhart, C.M., "From financial crash to debt crisis" 101 (101): 1676-1706, 2011
33 Anderson, T.W., "Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data" 18 (18): 47-82, 1982
34 Holtz-Eakin, D., "Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data" 56 (56): 1371-1395, 1988
35 Us, V., "Dynamics of non-performing loans in the Turkish banking sector by an ownership breakdown: The impact of the global crisis" 20 : 109-117, 2017
36 Keeton, W. R., "Does faster loan growth lead to higher loan losses?" 84 (84): 1999
37 Dickey, D.A., "Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root" 74 : 427-431, 1979
38 Williams, J., "Determining management behaviour in European banking" 28 (28): 2427-2460, 2004
39 Škarica, B., "Determinants of non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries" 38 (38): 37-59, 2014
40 Diwan, I., "Debt reduction, adjustment lending, and burden sharing" 1992
41 Salas, V., "Credit risk in two institutional regimes: Spanish commercial and savings banks" 22 (22): 203-224, 2002
42 Chaibi, H., "Credit risk determinants: Evidence from a cross-country study" 33 : 1-16, 2015
43 Ghosh, A., "Banking-industry specific and regional economic determinants of non-performing loans: Evidence from US states" 20 : 93-104, 2015
44 Çifter, A., "Bank concentration and non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries" 16 (16): 117-137, 2015
45 Ruckes, M., "Bank competition and credit standards" 17 (17): 1073-1102, 2004
46 De Bock, R., "Bank Asset Quality in Emerging Markets; Determinants and Spillovers" 2012
47 Podpiera, J., "Bad luck or bad management? Emerging banking market experience" 4 (4): 135-148, 2008
48 Arellano, M., "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models" 68 (68): 29-51, 1995
49 Wold, H., "A study in the analysis of stationary time series" 1938
Markov 전환율을 활용한 자영업자 생애근로유형별 연금소득대체율 추정
기업의 현금보유수준, 재벌여부가 내재 자기자본비용에 미치는 영향: 한국기업을 중심으로
유가증권시장과 코스닥시장 간 신규공모주 저가발행 차이는 존재하는가?
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2016-03-30 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Journal of Insurance Studies -> Journal of Insurance and Finance | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-02-10 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 보험개발연구 -> 보험금융연구외국어명 : Korea Insurance Development Institute -> Journal of Insurance Studies | ![]() |
2008-06-20 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 보험개발원 -> 보험연구원영문명 : Korea Insurance Development Institue -> Korea Insurance Research Institute | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2005-05-18 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 보험개발연구외국어명 : Korea Insurance Development Institute | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.77 | 0.72 | 1.15 | 0 |