This study investigated the utilization of bootstrap techniques in assessing the significance of indirect effects within structural equation modeling. Non-parametric bootstrap was applied using raw data, while parametric bootstrap utilized correlation...
This study investigated the utilization of bootstrap techniques in assessing the significance of indirect effects within structural equation modeling. Non-parametric bootstrap was applied using raw data, while parametric bootstrap utilized correlation matrix data. The analysis revealed distinct differences in the significance levels of indirect effects between the first non-parametric bootstrap and parametric bootstrap methods, with the parametric bootstrap consistently yielding lower significance levels across all cases. Additionally, the parametric bootstrap exhibited a more stable and normal distribution-like pattern in all re-sampling distributions compared to the non-parametric bootstrap. Furthermore, in both non-parametric and parametric bootstrap methods, it was observed that as the number of re-sampling iterations increased, the significance levels decreased; however, beyond 500 iterations, both methods showed minimal changes in significance levels. Lastly, as the number of bootstrap iterations increased, both methods displayed stable re-sampling distributions. In conclusion, it was determined that the selection of bootstrap technique and the specification of the number of bootstrap iterations can influence the significance levels and statistical significance of indirect effects.